Can anyone tell us about the CPUs of the Inter series and the AMD series

Intel and AMD have different design routes.

Intel focuses on high-end high-end, while AMD focuses on high-frequency efficiency.

The main differences are the core process, execution pipeline, data reading mechanism, instruction set, etc.

For example, AMD

athlon3000+

Series. Its main frequency is the main frequency.

But the overall performance can reach Intel

pentium4

level. So AMD's CPU has always been named after the PR nominal way of its own CPU.

The current AMD series CPUs have very strong floating-point computing capabilities, which are much higher than Intel's. Therefore, the CPU of the AMD series is the first choice for many game lovers.

Although Intel's CPU is not as capable of floating-point arithmetic as AMD, its system storage and integer arithmetic capabilities are very strong.

Therefore, the CPU of the Intel series is competent for the requirements of multi-**, business office and so on. Its capabilities are also slightly better than AMD's.

Notebook instruction set for AMD CPUs and Intel CPUs.

In fact, most of them are the same, with different names and similar functions.

You can use CPU-Z to check it at a glance.

However, AMD's CPU is still the CPU of the previous generation (K9) K9 core, from 754 pins when it was first released, to 939 pins, to 940 and then to the current AM2

It can be said that Lian is quite old-fashioned, and the implementation efficiency is the same as the TDP

You can't even get heat.

With the core that is now in its prime

duo to compare.

Especially under the recent ** suppression of Intel, it turns out that AMD's ** advantage no longer exists.

If it is said that in the case of ** equal, AMD has no CPU that can be compared with PE2180.

Black Box 5000+** is similar to PE2180, but what about the heat? What about TDP?

Also, the black version of the 5000+ is overclocked, but after it is overclocked, the heat also rises at a geometric speed.

and PE2160

2180, just find a U, find a good board, you can exceed the main frequency to more than 3G.

5000+ is not comparable to PE after overclocking, both in terms of performance and heat.

You're looking for ATI

78g chip, right?

Don't worry, NVIDIA's integrated board will come out soon If you really want to give a more suitable U, there is only a black box version of 5000+.

It is recommended that you use PE2180

Generally speaking, when playing 3D games, AMD is stronger than Intel, this is because AMD has better floating-point computing power than him, but AMD has a bottle well and lacks memory in terms of memory. Therefore, the frequency of AMD is not high, the general ones are around 2G, and the low-end ones are to, like what Shanlong is below 2G. And Intel

It's different, his frequency is very high, but you can't feel it, hehe, here's why, Intel's is fast when running large programs.

And the stability is also high, which is generally used by companies. There is another reason, AMD's is cheaper and more cost-effective. Hehe, this is the result of competition. I use AMD, and I personally recommend if the economy is not enough. Just AMD. If the economy is enough, it is intel

And if you play games, you can amd

Intel and AMD have a design that separates them. Like L2 caching and the like. But CPU performance in the same price range is about the same.

Intel's strong AMD in terms of gaming is more than **. But it's not much the same. Intel has no rivals on the high-end.

Therefore, AMD's share of global consumption is not very large. Between 20%-30%. Personally, I prefer Intel's because of the good selling price of second-hand for a period of time.

The internal structure of Taixiang can be found on the net. But the average person can't understand it.

The first is the price, in the two chips of the same grade, AMD is about 40% cheaper than Intel. This is a high attraction for each of you! AMD's CPU has advantages over Intel's processors of the same grade in terms of three-dimensional production, game applications, and processing, while Intel's CPUs have advantages in commercial applications, multi-applications, and graphic design.

AMD's floating-point is one unit higher than Intel's, so in this regard, AMD has an advantage in gaming.

AMD can be seen from here

The CPU is better than Intel when it comes to processing graphic images such as three-dimensional.

However, Intel has developed a meat buckle architecture, which is low loss and high performance, and has good overclocking performance, and can be stably overclocked with a good board (with P35 cross-energy characteristics).

Intel is much better than AMD in handling multi**.

In fact, the comparison of the two CPUs is too redundant, and the world knows that before Intel Core, AMD has an advantage in gaming, referring to the comparison of the same grade. Intel has an advantage in office and some graphic design.

Therefore, if you use it for entertainment, it is recommended to use AMD, which is also cost-effective!

The AMD4800+ and AMD5000+ of the same grade you mentioned are good, and they are a very good choice with the motherboard of the current AMD chipset!

From an objective point of view, if it is applied to general applications, such as stability, Intel is better, of course, if it is a game, I still recommend AMD, if it is not very sufficient funds but has high performance requirements, AMD is undoubtedly the first choice. However, if you really like one brand, it will definitely not feel very cool to use things from other brands.

AMD and Inrel in comparison.

The former generates more heat than the latter.

High power consumption. Nearly half cheaper.

The former is used in games.

The latter is used for offices.

Wow! It's so concise.

The simple one is inrel

Better than AMD

But AMD is cheaper!

The single-core CPU performance and memory controller of the Intel SNB series are enough to kill the AMD family in seconds, and the power consumption is also low, which can be said to be a comprehensive leader. But that's not to say that AMD is worthless, you can take a look, how much does the X4 641 cost? This is a quad-core processor, and if you run professional software, rendering, etc., it is enough to pay twice as much as the i3 in seconds.

However, in many cases, the game performance is not as good as the dual-core G530, and this series of CPUs has broken AMD's bottom line in terms of cost performance, so AMD's current situation is quite embarrassing, and the bulldozer has also failed.

So now Intel is better than AMD in terms of both gaming and office, but it depends on the specific use and waist bag. If you need a multi-core application and you need a low price, the AMD 6x1 series is a good one. In addition, the open-core CPU is very cost-effective.

Therefore, aside from the best factors, Intel is leading in single-core efficiency, L3 cache access speed, memory access speed, power consumption control (advanced nano technology, low frequency and high energy), K and X series overclocking ability (frequency doubling can be pulled very high, and high efficiency, performance is not only more than the main frequency, but also has a lot to do with the architecture, such as bulldozer is high frequency, high heat and low energy) and so on, and hyper-threading technology can improve multi-core applications by nearly 30%.

In addition, when it comes to overclocking, since Intel restricts the super-frequency (pulling the external frequency is dangerous!). So except for the K and X series to unlock the frequency multiplier, nothing else can be exceeded (hard modification is not possible), but AMD can greatly exceed the external frequency, regardless of low-end or high-end, but the high-end can be doubled (black box).

The above manual input prompts that the saying "rich Intel, no money AMD" is completely outdated, and it is a fallacy now.

The interfaces are different, the architectures are different, and the chipsets are different. At present, relatively speaking, AMD's CPUs are more popular in the middle and low end, and Intel's CPUs occupy the high-end and flagship market. People with less money use AMD, and those who don't have bad money use Intel.

Intel's main CPU family models are:

pentium

pentium pro

pentium ii

pentium iii

pentium 4

pentium 4ee

pentium-m

celeron

celeron ii

celeron iii

celeron iv

celeron d

xeon and so on.

And the main CPU series models of AMD company are:

k5 k6k6-2

duronathlon xp

sempron

athlon 64

opteron