Ask, how do you evaluate someone s speech in English? 25

Actually, if you just want to cope, you can say that.

your speech is great, but is still a lack of self-confidence.

Your speech is great, but you still lack confidence.

you sound good, but not enough solid basic skills.

Your voice is good, but your fundamentals aren't solid enough.

your language is very fluent, but speech is not enough deep understanding of the content

You speak fluently, but you don't understand the content of the speech well enough.

the language of your organization, the voices are very good, also very confident, i really like

I like the organization of your language, your voice, and your confidence.

Generally, a sentence can be added later.

i hope you continue to work

I hope you keep up the good work.

Or. i look forward to your next performance

I'm looking forward to your next performance.

You can say. your speech is great,but is still a lack of self-confidence.

Your speech is great, but you still lack confidence.

you sound good,but not enough solid basic skills.

Your voice is good, but your fundamentals aren't solid enough.

your language is very fluent,but speech is not enough deep understanding of the content

You speak fluently, but you don't understand the content of the speech well enough.

the language of your organization,the voices are very good,also very confident,i really like

I like the organization of your language, your voice, and your confidence.

Generally, a sentence can be added later.

i hope you continue to work

Or. i look forward to your next performance

I'm looking forward to your next performance.

Comment on other people's speeches from the following aspects:

1. Theme: The theme is clear and profound, the ideas are novel, the views are correct, the opinions are unique, and the style is positive.

2. Materials: The materials are real, typical, novel and rich in content. They can be linked to reality, close to life, reflect objective facts, have universal significance, and embody a certain spirit of the times.

3. Structure: The structure is complete and reasonable, and the argument is logical; It's smart and charming.

4. Expression:

Speak clearly, naturally, concisely, accurately, concisely, at an appropriate pace, with a strong sense of rhythm and unscripted.

5. Emotion: Vocal and emotional, subdued and frustrated, in line with emotional changes, and infectious.

6. Voice: loud voice, standard Mandarin.

7. Etiquette: pay attention to speaking skills, act decently, naturally and decently, be vigorous and full of energy.

8. Manners: neat and tidy, dignified and generous, greeting and thanking on stage, etc.

1. Language expression ability: consider the speaker's language communication ability, including the vocabulary, grammatical structure and accuracy of oral expression used in expression, to see whether the speaker expresses clearly, whether the words and sentences expressed are correct and powerful, and evaluate the fluency of the speech.

2. Pronunciation: Consider whether the speaker's pronunciation is accurate, whether the intonation is timely, and the correct phonetic transcription is used. Evaluate whether the speaker is fluent in pronunciation and whether there are any mistakes.

3. Content grasp: consider whether the speaker can grasp the content of the speech, grasp the theme, deal with problems, grasp the key points, and distinguish the relationship. It allows the speaker to effectively convey the content of the topic through the expression of its content, and evaluates whether the speaker grasps the theme through the expression of the content and whether there is any superfluous content.

4. Skills: Consider whether the speaker has used some effective techniques, such as shouting and imitation, synonyms, contrast, etc., which can increase the expressiveness of the speech and further show the Zheng Shirong and the theme in the speech.

5. Goal achievement: Finally, consider whether the speaker can achieve the goal of the speech, evaluate whether the speaker can highlight certain concepts through the speech, and stimulate the audience's thinking through the speech, and effectively complete the speech.

The evaluation of a speech depends not only on the eloquence of the speaker, but also on the topic of the speech, its purpose, the audience and the environment, and the interaction between the speaker and the audience. Therefore, evaluating other people's speeches needs to be based on a comprehensive consideration of these aspects.

First, we can evaluate a speech based on its topic and purpose. The topic and purpose of the speech are key to determining the content of the speech, so if the speaker can clearly and unambiguously convey the topic and purpose, then the speech is half the battle. In addition, the needs and expectations of the audience are also worth considering, as the success of the speaker depends on his ability to meet the needs of the audience and make it satisfying.

Secondly, the performance of the speaker during the presentation is also an important indicator for evaluating the speech. This includes the speaker's ability to express himself/herself, fluency, posture, voice, use of eyes, body language, and control of atmosphere. These aspects directly affect the speaker's expression of his or her heart, and make the audience interested and trust in the content of the speech.

Third, the audience's reaction and interaction are also one of the indicators of the jujube price speech. This can be done by asking questions to the audience, gathering feedback, or observing how the audience reacts. If the audience resonates with the content of the presentation, believes that the speaker is genuinely engaging with them and keeping in mind their needs and expectations, then the presentation has been successful.

The speaker's background and experience also need to be considered before giving an evaluation. Experienced speakers deliver better presentations and produce better performances than novices. In addition, the performance of the previous speech will also affect the quality of this presentation, so it is necessary to consider all the above aspects and give a reasonable evaluation of the presentation.

In general, when evaluating a speech, we need to consider the topic, purpose, audience, and performance and background of the speaker. In view of the consideration of multiple dimensions, different evaluation criteria can also be given according to the situation of the speech itself. <>

Actually, if you just want to cope, you can say that.

your speech is great, but is still a lack of self-confidence.

Your speech is great, but you still lack confidence.

you sound good, but not enough solid basic skills.

Your voice is good, but your fundamentals aren't solid enough.

your language is very fluent, but speech is not enough deep understanding of the content

Your language is fluent, but your understanding of what you're talking about isn't deep enough.

the language of your organization, the voices are very good, also very confident, i really like

I like the organization of your language, your voice, and your confidence.

Generally, a code bucket key can be added after it.

i hope you continue to work

I hope you keep up the good work.

Or. i look forward to your next performance

I'm looking forward to your next performance.