What is the relationship between matter and thought?

Let me tell you what I think.

Thought is the reactive form of matter.

Two days ago, I watched a science and technology program: using computers to simulate the world, so that the simulated world has thoughts and the most basic behavioral reactions of ordinary people, so as to assume that the world we live in now is a virtual world simulated by others; Our world is nothing more than a program made up of countless data and instructions that can work according to certain rules.

And such assumptions can be just the question you ask. I myself believe that such assumptions are reasonable, that is, ideas are a reaction, a reaction of programming. The program designed here is what I think of as a series of systems made up of the matter of our world.

I believe that everything in the world has a causal relationship, and like dominoes, the fall of the first piece heralds the fall of the last. If you don't look at the process in between, wouldn't you think it's amazing? If the computer is a little more developed, it can recognize language, tone, color, smell, etc., and then it can make a series of corresponding responses, for example, when you are unhappy and angry, it will be very amazing for you?

It's you, and you probably won't, because we all know it's achievable. But for people who don't understand computers and don't understand computer principles, he can't imagine such a scenario.

And what about the relationship between thought and matter? From conductors, transistors, integrated circuits, arithmetic circuits, digital signals, computers, programs, robots, and virtual worlds, there is actually a strict causal relationship. If you understand that when matter is made up of certain reactions, and that specific reactions are formed when they are formed together, then the relationship between matter and thought is no longer so mysterious.

Thought and matter are actually the last and first dominoes, but we still stop at the macro analysis of what the first card and the last card are, without analyzing the relationship between the first card and the last card.

All of the above shows that I believe that thought is a reactive form of the internal structure of matter. Thought does not exist apart from matter, and matter does not necessarily have thought. Matter is only possible to have thought through the composition of the system.

By the way, extend that TV show. If you want to know if our world is a virtual world designed by someone else, it is actually very simple. Just like enlargement, we can see that a lot of small squares form a clear image, no matter how clear you are, it must be composed of these small pixels, we only need to prove that we are not composed of those three-dimensional pixels, then we have to infinitely enlarge our world.

Yes, this comes back to my previous analysis of the theory that I thought of as microscopic particles are actually pixels, and in the whole existence, data is pixels. Computers are powered by electricity, while the world is powered by time. It also proves once again that our world is a circular world, and the timeline is a loop.

The jury is out on this at this time. The textbooks are nonsense, and no one can really explain it. Because we live in a material world.

Everything is divided into two and must be seen dialectically. The primacy of matter, this is the basic viewpoint of Marxism, there is nothing to say, the spirit or consciousness is peculiar to man, or at present, the material and spirit are both opposite and unified. Matter and spirit are not only distinct from each other, but each has its own relative independence; Moreover, the premise for the interdependence and mutual existence of matter and spirit is that in interdependence, matter and spirit obtain their different prescriptiveness, that is to say, the reason why matter is material and spirit is spirit is that they obtain their different prescriptiveness from the interdependence of the two.

The current philosophy textbooks, however, believe that matter is the first.

First, the spirit Second, matter can exist independently of spirit, that is, matter and spirit can be separated from each other, and the two are not interdependent. We believe that the current Marxist philosophy textbooks erroneously stipulate the relationship between matter and spirit. Although matter and spirit are opposites, they are unified, that is to say, although matter and spirit are different and distinctive, they are interdependent and mutually existent.

Neither can exist separately from the other, and it is in interdependence that the material and the spiritual acquire their own different prescriptiveness.

The question of the relationship between matter and spirit is a fundamental question of philosophy, and for many years people have been confusing it with the question of the relationship between nature and spirit in accordance with Engels's relevant exposition. We believe that the reason for this confusion is that people have been using the concept of nature instead of the material category to compare it with the spiritual. The concept of the material category is very different from the concept of the natural world.

Matter is a philosophical category, which is an abstraction and generalization of various concrete substances in the objective material world, a general concept of commonality, and a pure ideological creation, whose extension includes not only the natural world, but also the human society, and the spiritual world. The natural world is a descriptive comprehensive concept, which is divided into narrow and broad senses, the broad sense of nature includes human society and the spiritual world, and the narrow sense of nature is the opposite of human society and the spiritual world. The natural world is only a description of the collective nature of things, not an abstraction of all things, nor is it a general concept of commonality.

In short, matter and spirit are contradictory relations that are both opposites and unified, and the two sides are interdependent, mutually transformed, and mutually existent, and neither of them can exist separately from the other. It is in the relationship of interdependence that the material and the spiritual acquire their own different prescriptiveness.

Please don't be misled by the respondent above, he (she).

The conclusion is wrong. The reason why he or she is wrong is that he or she is wrong about this premise: matter and spirit are a pair of contradictions.

In fact, matter and spirit are not a pair of contradictions, because matter does not need to depend on spirit to exist, without spirit, matter still exists. The material world existed long before the birth of mankind. Although he (she) emphasizes that "matter is not the natural world", he (she) also admits that "matter contains the natural world" and "spirit is peculiar to man", so reasoning according to the theory of this respondent will lead to such an absurd conclusion:

The natural world was born at the same time as the first human beings. The absurdity of this conclusion is close to the biblical story of God's creation of the world. Take a closer look at the answer of the respondent above, who does not hold the argument "why matter and spirit are contradictory", and even contradicts himself

Matter is a philosophical category, which is an abstraction and generalization of various concrete substances in the objective material world, a general concept of commonality, and a pure ideological creation, whose extension includes not only the natural world, but also the human society, and the spiritual world. In this respondent's definition, "matter" already includes the "spiritual world." Then I would like to ask this answerer:

What is the relationship between "spirit" and "spirit world"? If "matter" already includes the "spiritual world", then how do "matter" and "spirit" interdependent, and how do they become a pair of contradictions? Seeing that this respondent emphasized the "mutual prescriptiveness" of matter and spirit, I speculated that he or she only saw "mutual prescriptiveness" at first, and then formed an inner conviction:

Matter and spirit are therefore a pair of contradictions", so it further forcibly defines "matter" and forcibly reasons that "matter and spirit are interdependent", but even if matter and spirit can be used to define each other, they are by no means interdependent, so they cannot become two sides of a pair of contradictions.

Definition of Spiritual and Material Relations:

The universe is a system of perpetual development that is united by the opposition between spirit and matter. This system allows everything to go from nothing to something and from something to nothing. Among them, the "nothing" from nothing is the spirit, and the "being" from the existence to the non-existence belongs to the material.

Mind becomes matter so that energy turns into mass and moves to rest; Matter becomes spirituality, sees mass energy, stillness to movement. Everything in the world comes from the mutual transformation of the two. Understanding the law of transformation is the search for truth by human beings.

In this way, truth comes from two sources. The first is that the spirit determines the material, that is, the development norm of things from nothing, and the second is that the material determines the essence of the development of spirit, that is, things, from existence to nothing. On Earth, human beings are inherently different.

Westerners are adept at the act of material exploration from what is to nothing. Correspondingly, the Oriental is good at the act of spiritual exploration from nothing. As a result, from the material to the spiritual, Westerners have produced a series of physical and mental structure protection methods such as Western medicine and psychology from the outside in, while the East has given birth to a series of psychosomatic relationship conditioning methods such as traditional Chinese medicine and qigong from the inside out.

In reality, life is a small universe. From the small to the big, human beings can go from understanding the essentials of life and health to being familiar with the unified norms of nature. Here, because the individual perfects the knowledge of the whole and the necessity, human society is constantly moving closer from relative truth to the realm of absolute truth.

I believe that spirit and matter complement each other, are mutually reinforcing, interdependent, indispensable, material is the foundation, and spirit is the driving force. First of all, matter is the prerequisite for spirit, material is the foundation, and only when material is guaranteed can we provide a strong backing for spirit. The richer the material is developed, the richer the spirit will be enriched with the development of the material, and the material restricts the spirit.

Think about it, if a person can't even solve the problem of food and clothing, how can the spirit be enriched?

It does not mean that without material, a person's spirit will be gone, at least the spirit must have a certain material as a guarantee. To improve a person's spirit, we must first improve a person's material, and the level of a person's material development determines the level of spiritual development, and the degree of material richness determines the degree of spiritual richness. For example, the primitive society, the slave society, and the feudal society could not enjoy the spiritual life of the present society, because the social productivity at that time was low and there was no highly developed material foundation.

A person's spirit provides a powerful spiritual power for matter, and at the same time restricts the development of matter.

Once the pure personal spirit is understood, it will be done quickly, and without restraints, it will let go of its hands and feet and vigorously develop the material, and the degree of spiritual openness restricts the degree of material development. If a person's spirit is not firm and wavering, looking ahead and looking ahead, it is impossible to provide spiritual support and motivation for the material, and how the material can develop can only be abandoned halfway. In short, people live a lifetime, spirit and material are equally important, both must be obtained at the same time, and one cannot be neglected at the expense of the other, spirit and material are interdependent and interdependent, and one is indispensable.

There is a saying that complains about people: "there is a problem with the mind", and it is more accurate to say that "the mind is restricted".

And the secret of life is that everything that happens is what drives the expansion of our minds. The most difficult thing for people is not a change in habits, but a change in thinking.

I learned a sentence in a primary school textbook: "Stay in the green mountains, don't be afraid of no firewood." "Aoyama" refers to thought, while "Chai" refers to matter. For a person whose mind is not limited, creation is natural.

A positive and optimistic person, where is not the light. A coarse and negative person is dull everywhere.

Thought determines matter, and matter reflects thought. The lowest band of thought is crystallized "matter", and the highest band of matter is pure "energy".

Loosen the shackles of your old thoughts, and there is light ahead.

<>1. Matter determines consciousness, and consciousness has an active effect on matter. Among them, consciousness can react on objective things, and the consciousness that correctly reflects objective things and the laws of their replication and development can guide people to effectively carry out practical activities and promote the development of objective things. The spirit is not omnipotent, but without the spirit it is impossible to do a hundred.

2. Developing people's spiritual resources and mobilizing people's spiritual energy will effectively promote the progress of society and people's own progress. It is from this perspective that dialectical materialism argues that the spirit can be transformed into a slick substance. It can be seen that the option "spirit cannot be transformed into matter" is misnomerized.

Therefore, this question should be discarded.

3. Matter determines consciousness. Consciousness has a counter-effect on material activity. Right consciousness promotes the development of things.

It is correct that the spirit is relatively independent of the material in the option, but it is not the reason why the painting of bread cannot satisfy hunger. "Painting bread cannot satisfy hunger" means that conceptual things cannot replace material things, and the reaction of things in the human brain is not the same as the thing itself.

4. The view that spirit does not have relative independence from matter is metaphysics, which only sees the primacy of matter, and does not see the reaction of spirit to the agency of matter, and exaggerates the decisive role of matter.

Hello, matter is the basis of everything, and relatively speaking, there are living things, and because of the emergence of intelligent animals, there will be spiritual existence. And in the case of obtaining material to ensure its own existence, the spirit will be more prominent. To put it bluntly, people have material things that ensure their existence and can think about how to live better.

But the spirit is whether a person can better maintain the best state and obtain more material things, which will ensure how well he lives. In this way, the material and the spiritual are inseparable from each other and can complement each other.