The Simba Bringing Fake Bird s Nest incident was filed for investigation, which side do you suppor

According to the latest news reports on the Internet, the Simba fake bird's nest incident has been intervened by relevant departments, and Simba has been placed on file for investigation, and Simba may also face 15 years in prison. For Simba's shoddy in the live broadcast room, it can only be said that no one can escape the punishment of the law, if Simba still sells to consumers under the premise of knowing that this product is a fake, then his behavior must be strictly punished by the law, if he is unaware, then he must also bear the corresponding responsibility for his own mistakes.

Review of Simba's Fake Bird's Nest Incident

In November, Simba's team sold a bird's nest product in its live broadcast room, which was revealed to be a fake, and the bird's nest in it was actually caramel, and the test report also confirmed that the main ingredient of this product was indeed caramel. Moreover, more than 50,000 copies of the tube product have been sold, with a cumulative sales amount of more than 15 million. After-sales Simba also promised consumers that they could be refunded if they were not satisfied, and they could refund one and pay three, so far, this compensation has been paid 24 million, but there are still quite a few consumers who have not been able to get compensation.

Relevant departments intervene in the investigation

In response to this matter, due to the large amount of money involved in Simba, the relevant departments also intervened in the investigation, and the relevant regulatory departments of Baiyun District, Simba's company, have investigated Simba Company, and the foundry of this bird's nest, Dazhou Xinyan Xiamen Biotechnology, will also be investigated, it is said that this company does not have relevant production certificates.

Support relevant departments to crack down on the sale of counterfeit goods

I am personally very supportive of the involvement of relevant departments in this matter. The matter of shoddy and false has already involved everyone's interests and disrupted social order, and must be severely cracked down. And this is related to food safety, consumers are to eat the stomach of the content, in case of problems, it is easy to have human life, for this kind of disregard for the safety of other people's lives of bad business, must be severely punished.

In this incident, I do not support Simba, because he is suspected of deceiving consumers, and he did not come out to apologize in time after making a mistake, which seriously disrupted the normal order of society, and his behavior is also a serious illegal act.

must support the netizens' side, because it turns out that Simba's bird's nest does have a fake, which seriously threatens the rights and interests of consumers, and is also named by the consumer association, although he apologized in the live broadcast, but if he makes a mistake, he makes a mistake, and if he makes a mistake, he will bear the punishment he deserves.

I think it is a good explanation for Simba or fans who buy goods, and it can sound the alarm for other anchors with goods.

I support the investigation of his team, who made false propaganda, exploited the trust of their fans to make money, and even threatened to cyberbully consumers, which is completely in defiance of the law.

Of course, I support the customers, if this kind of behavior is not dealt with seriously, it will cause a very big loss for many customers, and it is not conducive to the harmonious development of the live broadcast industry.

Of course, we support consumers, consumers like him to support him before they buy his things, the things sold are too bad, how to support him, we need to purify the network environment.

I support consumers in this matter, and I think his behavior is very bad, so we should let other live Internet celebrities learn from this through his thing, prevent this kind of thing from happening, and let everyone have a safe and healthy online environment.

Simba's live broadcast overturning is no longer a matter of one or two times, and Simba has overturned many times before. As for this incident, Simba also overturned in the live broadcast room, that is, the bird's nest incident, many people broke out that the bird's nest bought in Simba's live broadcast room was actually a puddle of sugar water, which was not nutritious, which can be said to be a deceptive to consumers.

So what is the truth about the Simba Bird's Nest incident? In fact, there are two theories, one is that someone else wants to engage Simba in secret, and the other is that Simba sells fakes.

Someone else wants to Simba in secret. As the so-called tree is a big move, Simba, who is thriving in Kuaishou, can say that the live broadcast career is smooth sailing, and often with his growth, it is followed by the red eyes of many people, so some people want to engage him. That's why there will be things behind, and for Simba, his temper is also very hot, many times when he encounters things that don't go his way, he will yell at each other, and often this is how it is easy to get along with others in the process of getting along, and for Simba's big Internet celebrity, integrity is often the most important, because once he loses his integrity, then there will be a lot of people who don't believe him, so there is a possibility that someone wants to engage Simba, That's why this fake bird's nest incident was created.

Simba sells fakes. According to reports from people familiar with the matter, Simba entrusted a merchant to manufacture fake bird's nests, and even the content of the agreement was ** out, and the content of the agreement was that Simba entrusted a manufacturing company to make bird's nests, but the cost ** was only 4 yuan. And for a big Internet celebrity like Simba, even if he is exposed to selling fakes, as long as he insists on not admitting that he is selling fakes, then there will be a group of fans who are willing to believe him, although there will be some impact, but it will not affect too much.

And the profit from selling fakes is very large, so Simba's overturn may not be framed by others, but to sell fakes himself, otherwise he would not have such a high profit.

And for Simba's team is a commercial team, their team is for the purpose of making money, and how to maximize their own interests is their ultimate goal. And the wool is always on the sheep, every anchor says that he loses money for the welfare of his family, which company for the purpose of making money will lose money for the welfare of his family, so Simba's incident this time is very likely to be debunked because he sold fakes, but for a big Internet celebrity like Simba, as long as he doesn't admit it, there will be no problem, because there will always be a large number of fans who are willing to believe him and buy what he brings.

The truth of the Simba bird's nest incident is that there was improper publicity for the sale of bird's nest in the Xinxuan live broadcast room, and the product information provided by the brand was misleading, and the bird's nest flavored drink was mistakenly promoted as a bird's nest product. The product itself is up to standard and meets the national food standards, but there is a controversy in the bird's nest industry standard.

Xin Xuan apologized to consumers for this matter, and will assume responsibility for improper promotion, and immediately recall the product sold, and submit"Refund one and pay three"、"Advance payout"compensatory measures. Let's not talk about the division of responsibilities with the brand, the first priority is to solve the doubts and concerns of consumers, and Xinxuan will never cover up dishonest business behavior.

I believe that only Simba's team knows the truth of the matter, and we have to wait for the follow-up development.

Simba has a high probability of falling into the pit.,Boasting about the product during the live broadcast is a very professional ethics thing.,It's just that it's a web page like a certain treasure and a certain Dongpinxi Xixi.,You can text induce but the key implementation standards、Ingredient list, etc. can't be filled in randomly,As for whether you can see how much water is in the content of this product, it depends on your own knowledge。 As for the live broadcast with goods, it is only touted and lacks the detailed content that can be viewed, so it cannot be said that it is definitely false propaganda, but it is okay to say that it is suspected of it, and then there is the whitewashed water army or iron powder, insisting that bird's nest is true, but the industry rules can't get the authorization of bird's nest products, so they make a marginal ball, and use the implementation standard of canned food to produce a flavored drink, but this involves the problem of ingredient list and nutritional content, and the protein content is 0 on the widely circulated ** on the Internet, as a flavor drink such an implementation standard and nutritional ingredients distribution list is actually not a problem, but if it is really bird's nest, then the protein content is definitely not 0, which is equivalent to the nutrition composition of the distribution table fraud, the actual product and the logo does not match the equivalent of you buy 999 gold bars and find that the surface of the copper is gilded, this is the identification of general fake and shoddy goods, and the sale of fake and shoddy goods is criminally responsible, the whitewashing result is more and more black, Simba has become a two-ended plugged mouse, It is rumored on the Internet that Simba wants to quit the Internet, and I don't know if there are these reasons in it.

Simba's bird's nest incident, the truth is not that Simba's bird's nest is like a drink, so it sells for 40 yuan, I followed him from when he only had 10 million fans, and I think that I understand Simba, he is very good to fans, and the rebates made in each live broadcast are very large, if Simba will sell fake bird's nests, then he will not have more than 60 million fans,

The truth of the Simba Bird's Nest incident is that these people compete with each other, smear each other, and smear others for no reason for the sake of their own interests, which is very shameful.

In the latest report, I saw that the bird's nest sold by Simba is not really bird's nest, but a beverage product, so from the perspective of beverage products, its ** is indeed expensive.

Knowing that the crime of selling counterfeits is unforgivable, if it is a partner's treachery and fraud, it should be traced back to the source, and no one is missing! We can't let the hard-earned money of the good people be wasted like this. Everyone should calm down and touch their conscience to think about whether they have a bottom line, and whether their bottom line is in **.

I think maybe this product was pitted by the manufacturer, generally not long-term contact with these high-end things People are easy to be misled by the vague information given by the manufacturer, after all, Simba was just an ordinary person before he became popular, it is impossible to often contact these high-end things, and it is normal to be misled as true, the rules of the industry You can fool people to give you endorsements and goods, that is the benefit, and the contract must also have a loophole in word games.

The Simba bird's nest incident illustrates an unspoken rule in the industry, it turns out that everyone goes to one person to get the goods, but suddenly there is a person who goes directly to the company, so the person who holds the goods in his hand is not happy to say that you are not in my hand to take yours is sugar water.

It's normal that the profit of a business is just one outbreak, and the public is generally brainless, and the profit of everything is very high.

The facial cleanser I bought before, I bought it twice, the first time I used it well, the second time I bought the facial cleanser, from the packaging, font, taste, foam degree, viscosity, the word code at the bottom end is not right, especially the taste, compared with the first time I bought, the second time I bought the taste is particularly heavy, pungent, and then I can't afford to foam, it's not good to rinse, I can't rinse it off, the font on the outer packaging is one yard smaller, the word code at the bottom is also small, and there is a black strip at the bottom that has become longer.

I'm sure most people have seen the Simba Bird's Nest incident. I think someone is framing me. Simba has so many fans, so famous. It's impossible to sell bad things to fans for a little profit, isn't that a discredit for yourself?

There is nothing about swallow or bird's nest, mainly additives account for half, especially calcium lactate, is there a professional to answer, can this thing be added to flavored drinks?

The truth is that this bird's nest does have bird's nest in it, but the content is not high. It is only about the size of an ant.

Fake one training ten! Deception leads to the consumer, criminal liability is pursued.

Xin Ba is the least ** on the whole network.

There are three possible truths about the Simba bird's nest incident, first, there is really the sale and purchase of fake goods, and second, someone deliberately smeared it. 3. Self-marketing.

This incident also tells us that live streaming must be supervised. I've watched the live broadcast of a certain hand and a certain sound, from a small anchor to a big anchor of tens of millions, it is all a play. The so-called bargaining for fans and so on are all performed according to the script, and fakes are rampant in the live broadcast room.

For example, the cost of raw materials in the live broadcast room of some things can't come out, how can it be true, friends who have watched the live broadcast will find that these phenomena are not necessarily in the live broadcast room of the small anchor. Don't judge by our subjective preconceived minds.

For example, we don't think that those at the top of the pyramid are going to be fame. However, we always regret to see that the listed company Changsheng Biotech counterfeited vaccine incident and Sanlu milk powder incident. and then to the celebrity tax evasion incident.

Writing makes us think, why is that? Changsheng Biotech has been listed, and it is also important in the industry but it is blatantly fake, why is this? Sanlu is so famous, but such a huge output and users produce substandard milk powder.

Why is that? Fan Bingbing is so rich, the salary and appearance fees and endorsements are sky-high, leading the fashion, but a large number of followers still have to evade taxes regardless of their image. Why?

This shows that we should not judge how strong and high the popularity is.

Of course, in the end, it is right for others to smear it, whether it is right to sell fake goods or to market them for themselves. There will always be a day when the truth will be revealed.