Case Analysis, Administrative Litigation Law Cases

This case is not within the scope of adjustment ...... the Administrative Litigation Law

The director of the bureau belongs to the private ...... of public vehicles

His conduct was only a personal act, not the performance of official duties, and not a specific administrative act, and there was no justiciability under the Administrative Litigation Law.

Therefore, he can only pay compensation at his own expense.

Therefore, the Public Security Bureau cannot be held liable for compensation.

The case should be divided by the traffic police for the accident responsibility, to the court to file a case for trial in accordance with the road traffic accident, using the road traffic safety law tort law is completely a civil lawsuit, according to the responsibility of each bear the corresponding civil liability ......

1. In this case, the school administration department is the main body for the implementation of the administrative punishment. According to Article 2 of China's Administrative Punishment Law, the main body of administrative punishment is the state administrative organ. The School Administration Section is the administrative body of the school, and it belongs to the category of the State Administrative Organ, so it is the main body of the implementation of administrative punishment.

2. In this case, the School Administration Division has the right to claim compensation. In the case that Wang accidentally caught fire while cooking with an electric stove without permission, causing damage to some public and private property, the school administration department has the right to impose administrative penalties on Wang in accordance with the relevant regulations of the school, and require Wang to compensate for the losses caused. Such compensation is in the nature of civil compensation.

3. The subject of revocation of administrative acts is the state administrative organ. According to Article 71 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China, the revocation of an administrative act may be carried out in accordance with law by the state administrative organ that made the act or the competent authority at a higher level. Therefore, in the present case, the Board of Education should not have revoked the "administrative penalty" imposed by the school, since the Board of Education is not the superior authority of the School Administration Section.

The school administration department shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions and legal procedures, revoke the administrative punishment it imposed.

After the analysis of the political, legal and administrative litigation law cases, I think that if the two of them are to pay more attention to that book, I think that their quiet analysis of the relatives should be the same.

I feel that this should be illegal, and this administrative law is a marketing method.

The contradiction between mediation and the legality of the Administrative Litigation Law is designed by the controversy caused by the examination. Administrative law is very closely integrated with modern imitation and reality, involving a large number of hot side issues, and it is more likely to test cases and essay questions.

Administrative Law and Nuclear Car Grilling Administrative Litigation Law Case Study Question Change, because this question is a genus, because this case is an administrative law type input method, here**? Therefore, even a fool can't understand these problems.

1.Is the administrative punishment imposed by the Industrial and Commercial Bureau on Li's illegal acts legal?

Legitimate. Because Li violated the law and should be punished.

2.Is the administrative penalty imposed by the Administration for Industry and Commerce on Li's illegal acts reasonable?

Irrationality. The punishment cannot be increased because he has been in prison.

3. Illegal gains shall be confiscated and a fine of 500 shall be imposed

In terms of administrative law, the public security joint defense team is an organization entrusted by the administrative organ, for example, the public security sub-bureau of a certain district may entrust the public security joint defense team of the district to exercise the power of public security management.

In practice, the public security joint defense force is formed by the public security organs and bears the funds, and in the course of its work, the joint defense team can only carry out administrative acts in the name of the public security organ that formed it.

Therefore, in an administrative lawsuit, it cannot be the defendant, but the public security organ that entrusts it with the exercise of power is the defendant, and in the case of state compensation, the organ obligated to make state compensation is also the public security organ that should entrust it with the exercise of power.

The joint defense of public security is an organization entrusted with the exercise of functions and powers. The organ with the obligation to compensate shall be the public security sub-bureau of the district that entrusts it with the exercise of the power of public security administration.

Administrative entities refer to social organizations that enjoy administrative powers, can exercise administrative powers in their own name, make administrative acts that affect the rights and obligations of their administrative counterparts, and can independently bear the corresponding legal responsibilities arising therefrom.

According to the authorization of the Education Law, technical colleges are public institutions authorized by the state to manage students, and the disposition of student status made by them is a specific administrative act with administrative powers.

According to the requirements of the implementation outline for promoting administration according to law, the principle of due process should be followed for all acts that affect the rights of administrative counterparts.

1. It can be reconsidered or litigated.

In case of reconsideration, the Municipal Transportation Bureau, the Municipal Bureau of Industry and Commerce, and the county ** can all accept the lawsuit and go to the county court.

2. No violation. He committed two acts, and the Department of Transportation and Industry and Commerce did not violate the "no penalty for one thing".

You can apply for administrative reconsideration or go to the court for administrative litigation;

The occupation of the road violates the traffic management regulations, and the sale of smuggled used clothes violates the product quality management regulations, and their actions are all illegal.