There is no charge for the original, but he has to charge for the cover? Netizen: When you become po

In reality, there are indeed a lot of people who love to sing, and many people can surpass the original song when they sing songs, and because of this, many Internet celebrities have also become popular by covering other people's works. And now many live singing broadcasts are also very popular, and it is precisely because of this that more and more people want to sing and become Internet celebrities. However, covers are also technical work, and not all Internet celebrity covers can be affirmed by everyone.

Of course, there are also outstanding people here, there are many Internet celebrities who have entered the entertainment industry because they sing too well, such as Feng Timo, who has indeed developed well in the entertainment industry, and the other is Liu Yuning.

It is estimated that everyone should have heard Liu Yuning's songs, and his singing voice is indeed very distinctive. He used to be a group of three people together, and he was famous for covering some classic songs on online platforms. It is true that Liu Yuning's covers are very good, but there is a song that still arouses heated discussions among everyone.

The song "Exploring the Qingshui River" has always been a song that everyone likes very much, and then Liu Yuning also covered it. However, he marked this song as original, and there was no standard cover, which is a bit unreasonable. However, later there was a song "Light Years Away" that surprised netizens, everyone knows that this song was originally sung by Deng Ziqi, of course, Liu Yuning did not mark the original song, but this song actually has to be charged.

It is true that many songs now have to be charged, but the original singer of this song, Deng Ziqi, did not ask for a fee, but Liu Yuning's has to be charged, why do you think something is wrong! This also made many netizens express their incomprehension, why should they be charged! Is it said that he sings more hotly than the original song, is it still good?

Some netizens also said that Liu Yuning is floating now!

The charge for this song was not proposed by Liu Yuning, it was arranged by the program team. But many netizens didn't understand and began to make offensive remarks against Liu Yuning. In fact, the copyright of the song should be in the hands of the program team, so people have to charge for it, and he has no choice.

So many netizens really misunderstood Liu Yuning. I don't know what everyone thinks about this?

After the cover was popular, it began to charge, and many netizens expressed their dissatisfaction, because the song is good, and it is also the strong support of many netizens, but now many song platforms are charging, causing everyone to mourn.

It's really not very reasonable. Liu Yuning has not had many original works since his debut, and they are basically covers of other people's works, but his covers need to be paid to listen, which is really incomprehensible.

How many songs from Hong Kong and Taiwan in China cover Japan? Is there a number? On Kugou, there is basically no charge for these originals, and there is basically a charge for covers.

It's right to pay for the version of the money.

What does the arrangement of the program group have to do with people? I just think he's good! Those who have been crawling all the way are not much better than others.

Liu Yuning, in this era of traffic monetization, the Internet has given ordinary people the opportunity to shine, and some people have even turned from small Internet celebrities to big stars, realizing a huge leap from flying on the branches to becoming phoenixes. Liu Yuning was once also one of the Internet singers, Liu Yuning once sang on the streets and bars as a member of the Modern Brothers group, gained a lot of popularity, and became a hot Internet celebrity. But after Liu Yuning became popular, Liu Yuning's cover of Deng Ziqi's song had to be charged on the ** platform, which made the unknown audience feel very angry.

This person is Liu Yuning, he is a very good singer and has sung many excellent works, so many people like him very much.

Liu Yuning, he was born as an Internet celebrity, he looks very handsome, and he has also covered a lot of songs.

Who is this singer? People confiscated it, it was the program team that bought the cover copyright, and the program team charged the fee! Got it? The singer can only sing on the show, but he can't get any fees? Do you want to go straight to the black? Is it interesting to have a from years ago..?

The copyright fee paid by the singer for covering other people's works is less than 100 yuan per song, and more than 3,000 yuan

**Copyright fee = number of seats 4% of the average ticket price

According to this formula, the minimum usage fee is as follows:

When the number of seats is less than 1000 (inclusive), if the charge for each ** work is less than 100 yuan, it will be calculated as 100 yuan;

When the number of seats is 1001-2000, if the charge for each ** work is less than 200 yuan, it will be calculated as 200 yuan;

When the number of seats is between 2001 and 5000, if the charge for each ** work is less than 300 yuan, it will be calculated as 300 yuan;

When the number of seats is 5001-10000, if the charge for each ** work is less than 500 yuan, it will be calculated as 500 yuan;

When the number of seats is 10,001-20,000, if the charge for each ** work is less than 1,000 yuan, it will be calculated as 1,000 yuan;

When the number of seats is 20,001-30,000, if the charge for each ** work is less than 1,500 yuan, it will be calculated as 1,500 yuan;

When the number of seats is 30,001-40,000, if the charge for each ** work is less than 2,000 yuan, it will be calculated as 2,000 yuan;

When the number of seats is 40,001-50,000, if the charge for each ** work is less than 2,500 yuan, it will be calculated as 2,500 yuan;

When the number of seats is more than 50,001 (inclusive), if the charge for each ** work is less than 3,000 yuan, it will be calculated as 3,000 yuan.

In the face of the phenomenon that the original song is not charged, but the cover is charged, I think it is undesirable. It's understandable that the original singer charges for it, but if you cover it, you steal someone else's work and use it yourself, and then charge for it, which is very undesirable. This kind of behavior is equivalent to the feeling of stealing someone else's watermelon and then selling it.

1. The original song can be charged, after all, it is the fruit of labor. I think that the original song can be charged, because the original song is, after all, the result of the singer's own labor. He may have spent a lot of effort on this song, which we don't know, and he can only earn a certain amount of money from the fee for this song, so that he can have financial income to create better songs, so the original song is completely acceptable.

Second, there should be no charge for covering songs, this is stealing the fruits of other people's labor. And then when it comes to charging for covers, I think it's very undesirable. Because you are stealing the fruits of other people's labor, and other people's creations are just sung in your own voice, I don't think there should be a charge, if this can be charged, then who would want to sing the original song?

This will make the original singer feel very unpleasant, and make the enthusiasm of others to create greatly decrease. We all know that intellectual property is still very important, and if it is not protected, there will be no development.

3. The original song can be charged, but the cover song cannot be charged. I think it's completely understandable that the original song is charged, and the song can be charged, because after all, this is the fruit of other people's labor, and others rely on this song to charge for subsidies and have economic income, which is the only economic ** of others, so the original song can be charged, but the cover is not.

If the cover song buys the copyright, it can naturally be charged, and the original song does not necessarily have the copyright.

Nowadays, there are many online singers who like to cover some other people's songs, and they have also received a good response on the Internet. Many netizens like to listen to other people's covers, not the original version, and many original songs are not charged, but covers need to be charged. For this phenomenon, netizens initially said that it was very messy, because they never understood why there was no charge for originals, and these covers would be even more popular.

In fact, this phenomenon is easy to explain, because some original singers are not popular enough, so the audience rate of their songs is not high. Or some old songs, although they are considered classics, they no longer conform to the current aesthetics. Therefore, it is very normal that the cover with many modern elements is more popular than the original song and is more loved by the audience.

I like to listen to coversIn fact, many people don't like to listen to the old songs of the past now, so for some classic old songs, their decline makes people feel very embarrassed. And the covers of some singers can be regarded as making these old buddies appear in the second middle of the audience again. Although the cover is more popular than the original song, this situation is understandable.

Because each song represents their own era, and different generations like different things. <>

And many singers choose not to charge when they publish their works, while some cover singers choose to charge ** in order to make some money. Although this is incomprehensible to many people, it is also acceptable for fans who support them. <>

The fact that the cover is more popular than the original does not mean that the cover is better than the original song, it can only be said that the cover is more suitable for this era. And some of the accounts have also made efforts and contributions, so it is understandable that they charge. Therefore, the cover and the original song are not opposites, but a win-win scene.

This is also normal. Sometimes, because the original singer is not well-known, his works are not easy to become popular even if they are good.

That shows that these people who cover it, their voices are very recognizable, and they have also aroused the love and recognition of many people, which is a very common thing now.

If there is no problem with the copyright, under normal circumstances, the original singer will officially express his acceptance or affirmation of the cover, or even thanks. I think both the original song and the cover song actually have their own style and taste.

I think it's still normal, sometimes the cover may be more popular with the audience, the cover is more flavorful, and the style is different from the original song, and it is natural that it is more popular.

As long as it is not an infringement of copyright, there is nothing wrong with the cover, some classics need to be continued and praised, but I hope that the cover will be more sincere and attentive, and it will also be accepted! It's best to be original or original under the annotation! It is also a kind of respect, cover songs must also have a certain threshold, don't have a variety of Internet celebrity versions, sing beyond recognition and upload in one go, and even some songs are searched out for dozens of covers, the original song has no sound source or can't be seen at all!

There are even many people who think that a cover is the original song.

This situation is also very normal, depending on which point the audience's aesthetic orientation is more inclined to, some people do have more flavor than the original singer after the cover, and they are more loved by themselves, so it belongs to each to take what he needs, which is understandable.

I agree very much, because we rely on our own diligence and hard work to achieve the career we want today, and we can write better works with our own hands to present them in front of the audience, so we should encourage them and not let others get anything in return.

I think this is very normal, because everyone has their own interpretation, and it is a good thing to be able to make the song more popular through covers, which can also make the song more popular.

I think this kind of thing is common, because often the cover will be more popular than the original song, and the cover can sing the original song better and more flavorfully.

I think it depends on the situation where the fee is charged, because some are covered in the show, even if the cover singer himself is unwilling to charge, the program team will still charge.

But if it's not for the cover in the show and you don't buy the copyright, but you charge for the cover because it is popular, then I don't think it's advisable.

If it's a charge after buying a copyright, in fact, I don't know if this kind of definition should be defined, if there is no copyright entanglement, this is more of a moral issue.

Personally, I think this phenomenon is actually quite good, but there is something wrong with the problem of charging, and it is very good to be able to give new life to the song.

I think this is very normal, because there are a lot of songs that don't cater to the listener's feelings, but the cover version will be very popular with the listener.

I think it's normal, you must pay a certain copyright fee for covering the original song, sing well, you want to listen to it, it's normal to pay a fee, right?

I'm supportive. This is because cover singers are more attractive because they have very good voices and tunes.

It's acceptable, as long as the song is good, it doesn't matter who is the original singer and who is the cover.

In fact, this situation can be seen in the singing industry really many times, and the original song does not necessarily have to be better than the cover, and there is no certainty.

Because after the Internet celebrity covers it, it belongs to another version of the song, which is equivalent to having a copyright, of course, you can charge for it.

Personally, I think the reason why I have to charge after the cover is probably because this cover has made this song popular, so it will be like this.

This is an unreasonable request. There is no charge for the original song, but the Internet celebrity has to charge. This is a disrespect to the original song. So I don't think it should be done that way. The original song should be respected.