College students choose majors based on social needs debate questions .

Interest is more important.

First, if you pay attention to the employment rate and choose a major that you don't like, then there is a high possibility of resistance in the learning process, and if you don't learn the major well, you may not be able to get a job in the end. Second, the more people choose from the majors with a high employment rate, the greater the competition, and the more talents in colleges and universities, the employment opportunities may not necessarily come back to their turn. So I think interest is more important, and the argument is as follows:

First of all, interest is the best teacher. If you're interested in something, there's an incentive to take the initiative. "Those who know are not as good as those who are good, and those who are good are not as good as those who are happy" likes to learn, which is the best way to learn.

In this way, there will be less pain caused by learning during the learning process. Let yourself learn in your interest and master it unconsciously, and have a greater sense of achievement.

Then, most of the majors that interest me are what I am good at. Further study in your field of expertise is easier to create value on the one hand, and on the other hand, it can reduce the resistance in the learning process. This allows you to set aside more time to learn other things, which can be developed in many ways.

Moreover, three hundred and sixty lines, the line is the champion. The major you are interested in does not necessarily have a low employment rate, and even if the employment rate is not high, it does not necessarily mean that you will not be able to make some achievements. There are not many college students or even graduate students who return to their hometowns to continue to be farmers, that is to say, the employment rate of fresh graduates in the profession of farmers is not high, but just like the new farmers we are talking about now, they are still doing a wonderful job.

Finally, China hopes to cultivate more technical talents, and the majors they are interested in will be more like to explore, and their hands-on ability will naturally improve, let alone technology. If you are interested, your enthusiasm will be high, the possibility of developing at a deeper level will be greater, the value you will create will be more, and your academic qualifications will not be low. To be realistic, with academic qualifications, is employment still a problem?

That's my opinion.

You have to think about it, but if your interests are difficult to get employed, then you have to give up, such as psychology, how do you get a job, you can't go to a research institution without a doctorate, as well as history, archival science, and basically find a job everywhere, you learn why, not only for interest but also to find a job.

Because only if you are interested, you can study this major in depth and gain certain professional skills in this major. If you are not interested, force yourself to study this major, then in fact, the whole process is very painful, learning this major, including engaging in this professional work in the future, this process may accompany you for a lifetime, if you have been doing something you don't like to do all your life, how painful.

So personally, I still focus on interest, and if I do, everything will become fun. There is also the thing of employment is also changing, first of all, not everyone is engaged in the profession he is studying, maybe the major you are studying for employment now, you may not be going to do it at that time.

Employment is also changing with the development of society, and it may be that the financial and real estate industries were very developed a long time ago, but not necessarily in the future, because these industries have already developed and prospered, and they will belong to a surplus period in the future. The computer employment rate is also very good, but people who are engaged in this industry may be more competitive in the future, so it is not certain that you can always participate in this industry.

In fact, each major has the characteristics of each major, the advantages of each major, and all majors cannot be measured by the employment rate, because although the employment rate of some majors is low, the development prospects are good, and the employment rate of computer majors is very high, but this development potential is very difficult, because the elimination rate of this industry is very high, and you may not be able to do it for a few years.

It's still the most important thing to have fun, and making money is just incidental.

The employment rate is very important, and it is difficult to stick to a job that is supported by interest without good employment prospects, after all, the material conditions of life are indispensable.

Summary. We must grasp and combine it with reality, ideals are often empty, we must conform to reality, and we must base ourselves on the present. In the process of adapting to society, you can grow and grow better.

Hello, it is a pleasure to serve you, I am the voice of the heart, I have seen your question and will reply to you within five minutes.

The growth of college students should pay more attention to social needs, so what is the opposing view?

I need to know the opposing point of view before I can defend it.

In the process of debate, the attack and defense is to ask questions, also known as questions, which are divided into two parts: asking and answering, so I need to know the hypocritical point of view of the opposing side, so that I can set up the question.

In the case of not knowing the opposing side's point of view, what I can shout to you is to provide you with some offensive content. For college students, the choice of a career depends not only on the political, economic and cultural conditions of the whole society, but also on the social environment and the feasibility of choosing a job.

When we choose a job, we should focus on the overall situation, and when personal hobbies conflict with social needs, and when there is a contradiction with the realization of personal values, we should obey the overall situation.

If an individual just blindly pays attention to his own preferences, his own needs to live, sail to work, and study, and does not realize that he is just an inconspicuous small wave in the sea of society, then the individual can only stay away from this society, and will unconsciously slack himself, and finally can only draw the end for himself with a sigh.

It is necessary to determine the direction of development in the future with the needs of the society, so that the old man can truly integrate into the society and make contributions to the society.

On the other hand, college students should pay more attention to their personal ideals in their growth.

I admit that it is good for college students to grow up and pay attention to personal ideals, but we will eventually enter the society, and we must take employment as the main premise. If you blindly pay attention to personal ideals, is this too idealistic?

When personal ideals and social needs do not match, shouldn't we first find a job to support our brothers? If Zimin can't support himself by himself, how can he really take his ideals later?

And can. What more could I ask?

Then, when debating, go and argue according to the opposing side's point of view.

Can you give a few suggestions?

We must grasp and combine with reality, ideals are often empty, we must conform to reality, and we must let the dust be based on the present. To adapt to the society, in the process of adapting to the society, a tan sedan car can grow, and brother Tong can grow better.

Listen carefully to the opponent's arguments, pay attention to the contradictory definitions, analyze and find the central idea of our first argument to reinterpret the definitions given by the other party.

Think about how the other person will define and analyze their own 1 argument. Then use the other side to explain the analysis again as a counterattack.

Let me give you some counter-ideas. If you can refute the following three points, you will be fine.

2.College students have little social experience. Interest is easily influenced by superficial understanding and cannot recognize the essence of facts. Even if you choose according to your interests at the time, you may not find out that you really like it later. [Subjective factors].

3.Undergraduate education belongs to general education, and if you are not interested in it, you can also change it by taking the postgraduate entrance examination. Besides, society is actually the real classroom, and the small society of the university is just to let everyone fully understand themselves and establish a lot of network foundation.

Isn't it a little superficial to focus only on personal interests? [Further argumentation and divergence].

First of all, I would like to state that I am a person who believes from the bottom of my heart that employment should be based on personal interests. But if only from the point of view of debate and not from the point of view of the pursuit of truth, I can give you a few suggestions. Hope it helps.

First of all, you have to state that if the personal interests and social needs of college students happen to be the same, there is no need to discuss, you should be discussing the conflict between the two. After this statement, you can use the following questions, otherwise you will be refuted by the other party with "personal interests do not contradict social needs".

First, the current employment environment in China is very poor, if the opponent cannot find a job that matches his interests in time, will he continue to waste his youth? If the opponent's defense friend does not waste his youth, but first finds a job that is easier to find, that is, a job that is more in demand by the society, then the opponent's defense friend is actually supporting our point of view with actions.

Second, employment itself is a process of participation in society. Does the opposing friend recognize that personal interests can be cultivated in society? If the opponent thinks that his interests cannot be cultivated in society, then why should he be employed, and he should simply waste it as in the first question.

Third, if the opponent thinks that he can cultivate interests in society, then why not actively participate in social needs first, worry about the worries of the world first, and enjoy the joy of the world after the world, and slowly cultivate his own interests that meet the needs of society and enjoy them?

Fourth, if the opponent thinks that although he can be cultivated in society, he is unwilling to change his interests in the urgency of society. Then the interests and even personal personality of the opponent's defense friend are likely to be selfish rather than beneficial to others. Then this interest should not be promoted.

What we are debating today is what we think is right, not our own selfishness and unreasonableness to have a bad influence on others.

Fifth, it can be discussed positively that there is no contradiction between employment first and cultivating personal interests. But sticking to interest and getting employed first are contradictory. Because the former may just be employed first, but stick to the ideal.

The latter, on the other hand, is likely to be unemployed if they do not match their interests. Let's take a few examples, such as a chef at Tsinghua University, who insisted on learning English after class and passed the TOEFL test. It shows that employment first does not delay the realization of personal ideals.

That's all for it. If it is a high school or a junior in college, I believe that there will not be many people who can refute these arguments.

It is not your interest that society needs, but your value.

1. If you are interested in working, you will not feel that it is hard and boring, personally

In order to have a happy person dao life. (Men are afraid of making mistakes.)

Insider, women are afraid of marrying the wrong Ronglang).

2. Only by being interested can you overcome many difficulties, and you will not retreat in the face of difficulties, and your goals in life can be clearer. (Social needs are always changing, but life goals are always the same).

For example, a survey by a university in the United States shows that graduates with clear long-term goals become pillars of society decades later. And the others are in the lower strata of society.

3. Only when you are interested can you be motivated, you can give full play to your potential, and your contribution to society will be greater.

For example, Adam Smith said, "We eat bread not out of the baker's favor, but out of his self-interest, but when he does so, it is often more in the interest of society as a whole."

4. Personal interest is an ideal and desire, and does not change because of changes in the external environment, even if you can't temporarily follow the ideal career employment, you can also work hard to achieve your long-cherished wish when the conditions are ripe.

That's all for it. You then play to play, for reference.

It's a pity that the landlord and my thoughts are all against personal interest.

First of all, if we are all based on personal interests, if we all love to count money, should we all go to work in the bank? Or do we all go to accounting, if we all want to be heartthrob idols, shouldn't we all go to art?

Secondly, it is necessary to recognize a situation, a job or employment position does not change with the change of people, personal interests only enrich the work and affect the work when employed.

You don't do it because you're interested in it, and you don't need to do it when you're not interested.