If the company has transferred a colleague who has a conflict with me, can I ask for a change of gua

It's one thing for you to ask for a change of guard, and it's hard to say whether you can change it, so the fundamental thing to solve the problem is to try to ease the relationship between the two of you, so that you don't have to hide anymore in the future.

I don't think you should ask for a change of bar, although you and that colleague have a contradiction, but I think you can still solve the contradiction, two people can turn the conflict into a jade silk, work and live together, and then there will be no big contradictions, if you change the guard, it is more significant, you are stingy, and then can not solve this contradiction, in fact, two people have contradictions all their lives, and the heart is not comfortable, after all, you have changed posts, or colleagues in the same unit, so it is better to solve the contradiction.

Of course! There are contradictions with each other, which affects getting along and affecting the ...... workIn such a state, even if you don't mention it, the leader will take measures ......It affected his work, and he didn't feel good......

So, as long as you can give a reasonable reason, you can convince the leader to give you a job change.

Mind you, the crux of the matter is that you have to give a reasonable reason!

This should not be, because what the company arranges is from the overall situation, and will not affect the company's overall plan because of your personal reasons, of course, you can explain the situation to the company, if the company can coordinate.

Why change the guard, if you want to change it, it is also a change of guard for later generations. You shouldn't change the guard, it's like a weakling, and you're going to be looked down upon.

The transfer of personnel in the company must be considered holistically, and the contradictions between you will not be considered. It's better to resolve the conflict privately and not bring it to work. Personally, I don't think it's better to ask for a change of position.

Actually, it's not necessary. As long as we can make a clear distinction between public and private, we can improve relations if possible. After all, it is more beneficial to a few talents in a unit or company to do a good job of unity!

Any contradiction can be resolved, as long as you find a breakthrough to resolve the contradiction, the two of them are like friends, what is needed between people is communication, and they will be friends after a long time.

There are a few questions to ponder.

。How do you make sure that there will be no conflicts with other colleagues after the change of guard?

。How many times can you change it after history repeats itself? Do you want to resign and change companies at the end of the day?

。Why is it you and not him who applies for a change of guard in the event of a conflict? Why can't you wait until he applies for a change of guard?

Will your supervisor or HR department accept your application without a valid reason?

After the incident, the news of the failure of the transfer application was spread, where is your foothold? Where will you go from here?

Here are the recommendations.

Work belongs to work, and if you can't get along, it's good not to be verbose.

Don't put yourself in an awkward position at any time.

It is better to be still than to be still, and it is more appropriate to respond to all changes without change.

For your appeals, it is more practical to be passive than to be active.

Don't hurt your personal feelings for the sake of the company.

It is common for conflicts to occur at the same time in daily work, and in this case, I personally believe that choosing to escape by applying for a change of guard cannot solve the problem fundamentally.

First of all, if there is a contradiction at the same time, if it is just some small things and has not been effectively communicated, then you should lower your posture as much as possible and take the initiative to release your goodwill to yourself at the same time, take the initiative to communicate with your colleagues, and resolve the contradictions and estrangements between each other as much as possible, so that the two people can be more harmonious in the future work and get along.

On the other hand, if there is a conflict at the same time, if you apply to your boss for a change of guard, and your boss does not approve it, then you still need to continue to get along with this one at the same time in the future, the relationship between the two people is extremely awkward and passive, and because you propose a change of guard, the contradiction between the two people will be further deepened, and it will not be able to fundamentally solve the problem.

And even if you apply for a job change, your boss finally approved it, and achieved your goal, but it does not mean that there will be any conflict with yourself at the same time, there will be no intersection in the future, if the contradiction between the two people is not effectively resolved, then the two people will continue to produce new conflicts in the future work contact, and the two people will not get along very well, so the first thing that comes to mind when there is a conflict with a colleague is not to apply for a job change. Rather, I think of how to resolve and eliminate contradictions through active communication.

Why avoid embarrassment, you can also ask the post leader to talk about it.

This can be refused.

1. Job transfer is the main content of changing the labor contract, and the employer must first reach an agreement with the employee, and the unilateral adjustment of the position by the employer without the consent of the employee is invalid in principle;

2. If the employer is transferred for production and operation needs, and the transfer is reasonable, there is no insult or punishment nature, the salary is not reduced, and there is a correlation between the position agreed in the labor contract, the transfer is valid; You as a laborer should abide by it. Of course, the reasonableness of the position adjustment requires the employer to provide evidence; On the contrary, if the employer adjusts the position of the employee based on forcing the employee to leave the job, the employee can refuse. If an employer terminates an employment contract on the grounds that the employee does not obey the arrangement, it is an illegal termination. You can apply for labor arbitration to claim compensation, and pay 2 months' salary for 1 year of work, that is, 2N;

3. If the employee is not competent for the job, the employer also has the right to adjust the position. Of course, the employer also needs to provide evidence if it claims that the employee is incompetent for the job. If the employee refuses to adjust the position, the employer terminates the labor contract on this basis, which is a legal termination, but the employer should also pay economic compensation, i.e., n.

You'll need to communicate with the company in a regulatory-led way to find multiple solutions to solve specific analytical problems.

Legal analysis: If the company changes positions at will, the parties can apply to the local labor inspection department to protect their rights. If there is a fixed Youmuzhou company to adjust the position at will, as a worker can refuse, if the company forcibly transfers and forces him to resign, it is a disguised downsizing of personnel, and as a worker, he can apply to the local labor resistance supervision department to protect his rights.

The employment contract shall be legally binding immediately and shall be binding upon the parties, and the parties shall perform their obligations under the employment contract.

Legal basis: Article 17 of the Labor Law of the People's Republic of China The conclusion and modification of labor contracts shall follow the principles of equality, voluntariness and consensus, and shall not violate the provisions of laws and administrative regulations. Labor agreements are immediately legally binding, and the parties must fulfill their obligations under the labor contract.

Summary. If you feel that the job is not suitable after the transfer, you can also be transferred back to the original position to work, if the employer transfers your position without your consent, and compulsorily requires you to be employed in the post, you can unilaterally terminate the labor contract, apply for labor arbitration, and require it to give you economic compensation.

The company asked me to change the guard, and I didn't agree, what should I do?

The company will not dismiss you and deliberately transfer your position.

If you feel that the job is not suitable after the transfer, you can also transfer back to the original job to work, if the employment unit transfers your position without your consent, and requires you to be employed in the post, you can unilaterally terminate the labor contract, and Shen Yeye requests labor arbitration to ask it to give you economic compensation.

I have been working in the company for 4 years, and now the company's business is not good, today the boss came to me and told me to go to work in the housekeeping department on April 1st, I don't agree, what should I do now? The housekeeping department is now resting according to the row, and they mean that they want me to go to the town register and send people to stop doing it.

Well, I have seen your problem, and according to your problem description, I personally recommend that you negotiate directly with your boss to inform you that you do not agree to the transfer.

If he insists on asking you to be transferred, you can also directly say that the law clearly stipulates that the transfer needs to be negotiated, and I refuse to transfer the post.

I told him that I am fifty-three years old, and I am cleaning in the guest room, and I am incompetent for back pain and dizziness, yes, there is no problem with your expression.

My contract is cleaning.

I have been on a cleaning contract for 4 consecutive years.

In fact, the two sides negotiated, and if the negotiation is completed, you will not be able to negotiate, you need to stay in the original post and continue to work, if he dismisses you, you will face compensation, you just need to work normally.

What if he says that cleaners and housekeepers are the same job?

According to the contract, it is cleaning work to do the contract, so what we do is cleaning, not room service.

Summary. No. The company can not be transferred at will, it must be negotiated with the employee to reach an agreement, the general position is written in the labor contract, and the transfer is strictly speaking to adjust the terms of the labor contract, so in principle, it is necessary to negotiate with the employee to transfer.

Article 35 of the Labor Contract Law stipulates that the employer and the employee may change the content of the employment contract if they reach an agreement through consultation. Modification of the labor contract shall be in written form. The amended labor contract shall be held by the employer and the employee.

This also means that in the absence of special provisions in the employment contract, the adjustment of the position, as an important part of the contract change, must meet two basic prerequisites:

1. The two parties reach an agreement through consultation;

2. Take written form. Both are indispensable, and if the employer unilaterally transfers the employee without consensus, the employee has the right to refuse. The labor contract shall continue to be performed in accordance with the original agreement.

According to Article 3 of the Labor Contract Law, the conclusion of a labor contract shall follow the principles of legality, fairness, equality, voluntariness, consensus and good faith. The labor contract concluded in accordance with the law is binding, and the employer and the employee shall perform the obligations stipulated in the labor contract. This means that if the contract stipulates that "the employee's position may be adjusted as needed", the adjustment can only be made.

Can the leader of the same position in the company change employees at will?

No. The company can not be transferred with Hu Pai, must negotiate with the employee to reach an agreement before transferring, the general position is written in the labor contract, the transfer is strictly speaking is to adjust the terms of the labor contract, Min Zuosui therefore needs to negotiate with the employee in principle to adjust. Article 35 of the Labor Contract Law stipulates that the employer and the employee may change the content of the employment contract if they reach an agreement through consultation.

Modification of the labor contract shall be in written form. The amended labor contract shall be held by the employer and the employee. This also means that in the absence of special provisions in the employment contract, the adjustment of the position, as an important part of the contract change, must meet two basic prerequisites:

1. The two parties reach an agreement through consultation; 2. Take written form. Both are indispensable, and if the employer unilaterally transfers the employee without consensus, the employee has the right to refuse. The labor contract shall continue to be performed in accordance with the original agreement.

According to Article 3 of the Labor Contract Law, the conclusion of a labor contract shall follow the principles of legality, fairness, equality, voluntariness, consensus, and good faith. The labor contract concluded in accordance with the law is binding, and the employer and the employee shall perform the obligations stipulated in the labor contract. This means that if the contract stipulates that "the employee's position may be adjusted as needed", the adjustment can only be made.

Have a great day!