The defects of SLR video, is it harmful to use SLR video?

If there is a flaw, it is that the SLR needs too many auxiliary equipment to shoot (Steadicam, rails, wheels, monitors, focusers...). The average person can't afford it. There are too many parameters, difficult to set, ordinary people even with professional equipment is difficult to shoot satisfactory**, this does require a lot of professional knowledge and technology, the ** effect of SLR shooting is much better than that of home DV, and the general camera is also unattainable.

For home use, choose DV.

No. Since the SLR has a video recording function, it can be recorded. However, the SLR is a camera not a video recorder, and there is a difference in design, the SLR is more suitable for still images, and it is easier to record in post-production.

In addition, many people use SLRs as tape recorders, and a shot is a few minutes or dozens of minutes. There is an impact on memory. Video recorder video, a shot is only a dozen or dozens of seconds. If so, it is no problem to use DSLR video.

Don't mislead people, the answer to this question is yes. Although this is done for a short DAO time, there will be no one.

What questions are within if.

No, it won't. When recording DSLR video, the light is directly imaged on the photosensitive plate, without a shutter, and the SLR has a long life of the shutter, so it will not cause damage to the SLR.

If it is common sense, there will be a little damage, as for how much no one has ever evaluated! I'm a ...... doing repairs

It is easy to burn the motherboard, the heat dissipation capacity of the SLR is insufficient, and working for a long time will of course reduce the lifespan, but it is much cheaper than the same quality digital cinema camera compared to his, so it is cost-effective to reduce the life.

There is no problem with normal use of bai.

There is absolutely no such thing, it will burn out the machine, why should the manufacturer get a camera function? Isn't it a contradiction?

Long bai

Remember that it is a long time) of the video will create a CMOS to produce a higher temperature, possibly (dao

It's not absolutely specialized.

will cause damage to CMOS devices, subordinate.

It will affect the image quality of the SLR camera in the future.

But I'm not afraid of 10,000, I'm afraid of what if, if it really damages the CMOS camera, it will be useless, and you can ignore it if you have a lot of money, haha.

No, at most there is an impact on memory.

Your statement is outdated, more than ten years ago, when the sensor technology has not been developed perfectly, the heat at work is more severe, affecting the life expectancy, there are many problems with the camera function, the primary stage, the camera is an unimportant function. And now it has come to the mirrorless era, the sensor technology has been greatly improved, and shooting ** is almost the same as taking pictures, and the mirrorless camera has been working since the beginning of the boot, and I have not seen any brand of mirrorless camera that will be finished soon. The recently released Sony A7S3 is a machine specially designed for **, you can shoot it, it will not affect the lifespan.

It has always been said that "photography is poor for three generations, and SLR ruined a lifetime", I never knew what it meant, and I didn't know the meaning of this sentence until I read these things today.

1. The most expensive lens in the world.

Do you know how much the most expensive lens in the world costs? I'm not afraid to tell you that this thing costs 12.56 million yuan. The lens was owned by the prince of the oil kingdom of Qatar, who personally went to the Leica company to customize it, and the lens cost $2.06 million.

In order to pick up this shot, the prince also spent money to customize a business vehicle.

This lens is a Leica R-mount, made entirely by hand in Germany, with a maximum diameter of 42 cm and a weight of 60 kg. If you want to see this lens, you need to go to the Leica factory in Germany, where there is also a prototype of this lens.

2. The world's largest fisheye lens.

The Nikon 6mm fisheye lens is the world's first lens to reach a 220-degree angle of view, which is simply priceless for many photography enthusiasts. This fisheye lens was released by Nikon in 1970 and was sought after by many people after its release.

With a heavy focal length of 6mm and an aperture of f, this fisheye lens is called "the widest wide-angle lens in history", and it is no exaggeration to say that you can see directly behind you when shooting with this lens. The lens currently has no owner and is still in a Nikon store in London for £100,000, which is equivalent to 1 million people.

3. The world's longest focal length lens.

Sometimes you want to shoot distant scenes, but your own lens always doesn't work as well as you want, and you can't do it with the Canon 5200mm F14 Prime, the world's largest DSLR lens.

I often hear people say "you can't buy anything with money", you can't buy this lens, there are only three of these lenses, and they are all in the hands of very wealthy private collectors. It is said that a prince in Dubai once paid a sky-high price to buy it, and the owners of these three shots were unmoved.

Fourth, the most expensive camera in the world.

The most expensive camera in the world is a Leica camera,** at 17 million yuan. The camera, the ancestor of Leica's first commercially available 35mm camera, was auctioned in Europe at the time, where experts estimated it to be between 600,000 euros and 80 euros, but the final auction price was 2.16 million euros.

The person who got the camera was an Asian, and no one knows what the name was.

5. The most expensive camera in China.

Compared with the most expensive lenses and cameras above, this camera in China is not good, but it is different in China. The Hongqi 20 set is also a knock-off, made in imitation of the Leica M4, and fewer than 200 copies are in existence. The ** of this camera is 130,000.

SLR imaging devices are designed for photography, not for photography.

The time for taking pictures is very short, and the time for the photosensitive work of the imaging device is extremely short. The camera is different, the imaging device needs to be continuously photosensitive for a long time, and the continuous work accelerates aging, so the camera destroys the SLR.

Whether it is better to use a DSLR or a video camera depends on the individual's situation. Novices are not recommended to use a DSLR, after all, the SLR is not as convenient as the camera in operation, especially in the automatic state. SLR is suitable for those who have a certain foundation in phase control and photography.

In wedding photography, there are some people who use SLR cameras, but there are mainly many people who use video cameras, but you don't see it. Shooting with a large sensor camera is still easier than using a DSLR, especially for zoom lenses.

SLR imaging devices are designed for photography, not for photography.

1.The camera screen has been optimized by engineers, and the display effect is transparent and beautiful2The camera display is relatively small, and the computer monitor is large, so it is clear to see on the camera, but not necessarily clear on the computer.

3.The overall whiteness should be the low brightness of the camera setting display, so the actual ** has been exposed, but the camera display display is normal, don't look at the display screen, you can see the index given by the metering in the viewfinder.

4.Clarity issues, I don't know if the pro is manual**or automatic**. If you encounter a darker environment, the shutter time will be long, because the hand will tremble or people will understand that it will be weak. It is recommended to use more manual **, just get used to it, and all the indices can be adjusted by yourself.

The question of clarity has been explained upstairs.

Indeed, many times after shooting**, it looks good on the camera, but when you look at it on the computer, it will be blurry or other situations.

With a lot of practice, you should be able to solve this problem to some extent.

As for the overall whiteness you said, I feel that you are shooting**Isn** a little too exposed?

If it is average metering, in some cases, depending on the different ways you meter, it is possible that the overall effect will be overexposed.

Can you tell us how you took pictures? What format is used to record it? JPG or RAW?

Hope it helps

The digital age originally needs post-production, of course, if you don't run out of focus, you still don't want to use a SLR if you expect to produce a film like a fool machine.

The first is the resolution of the camera, because it is small, so there is no way to see all the details, and it will feel good when integrated, and when you zoom in to the computer, you will feel that there are problems everywhere, **not clear,**dead black,All kinds of problems have come out。 There may also be problems with the computer, which may be due to insufficient color reproduction of the computer, which may lead to color deviation.

For the mosaic filial piety structure, the pixel and the resolution are the same, because each point of the picture resolution corresponds to a pixel, the only difference is the three-layer structure CMOS adopted by Sigma, which produces an image that each point corresponds to three pixels of different colors in the same position on the CMOS.

The AD converter has an effect on the depth of color, but only for graphics in RAW format.

There will not be a big difference in the quality of the samples of various manufacturers, after all, they are all shot by professionals, and the environment, objects, and equipment are carefully selected. The difference in the output of the film is often caused by different styles, and the photographer will also have a great impact on the different processing of ** through professional image processing software.