After the elderly pay for the purchase of a house for their children after marriage, do they want to

Support, as long as the old man has evidence in his hand, but it is estimated that he can only return the purchase price and interest, the value-added income of the house price ** has nothing to do with the elderly, which is equivalent to the old man lending money to his children to buy a house, the house is in the name of the child, and the old man has nothing to do with the house price appreciation part of the house, this matter is easy to deal with and troublesome, even if your children do not pay you back, you can still get a person to know the lawsuit and ask the court to enforce it?

The old man for his children to buy a house after marriage, want to get back the purchase money and value-added part of the trouble, this real estate certificate has your old man's name is easy to do, if there is no name of your old man, it is very troublesome, this belongs to the common property of your children after marriage, you can only ask your children for the purchase of the house after the consent of both parties, one party does not agree with you to get up is not an easy task, this has to be discussed through your discussion, and then it will not be possible to litigate in court. I don't think you should return since you bought it, anyway, it will be theirs in the future, I don't support it much, although you have money, but if you are unwell in the future, you still have to rely on your children.

Not supported! I think the old man regrets it a little now, maybe the children have done something wrong, so that the old man is sad, so he wants to get the money back, I think since I have given it, I will give it, the child will always be your child, and when their children are older, they will understand, this is not raising children and not knowing the kindness of parents!

If regret is something that can be given back, the elderly have the right to get back the purchase price, and the additional value-added part is probably not supported, but the interest part is supported, because the house is in the name of the child, and the value-added part should belong to the child!

I support the elderly to return the purchase money, because in today's society, the elderly pension is also a major problem, the elderly to return the purchase money should think that one is to provide for the elderly to be secure, and then there is the hope that the children can be self-reliant, do not form a gnawing old family.

It is reasonable and legal for the elderly to give back the purchase money to their children after marriage, and the children should also actively return it to the elderly, so that the elderly can spend their old age happily and happily, and it is also the filial piety of the children.

Support is going back, but it's hard to do. It doesn't make sense. It's a word that is not believed. will be reproached by the younger generation.

It's too normal for the elderly to pay for their children to buy a house, and if they don't leave evidence and relevant agreements when they give them money, their houses have already been processed and the real estate documents are legal, and it is really difficult to get them back. Unless you have a written or verbal agreement, it's hard to come back.

This kind of can't be said to support or not, because there is no problem for the elderly to return the house payment, the old man is not obliged to help his children buy a house, and it is understandable to go back, but I don't agree with it.

It depends on whether the old man gave you the money for the purchase of the house at that time as a gift or a loan.

If it's a gift, it's not appropriate to go back. If you borrow it and return the principal to the elderly, you can also pay it back a little more and make up a whole number. It should be regarded as a pension for the elderly. That's reasonable, but if they want the value-added part, it's unreasonable.

It's okay to do this, negotiate with your children, after all, paying for your children after marriage is also to relieve their financial pressure, and you also want them to live well.

If you want to get back the purchase price, you can negotiate and settle the value-added part between the two parties, and if the negotiation fails, you can take the form of litigation.

Summary. The old man paid for his children to buy a house before his death, and other children generally can't go back Oh The old man paid for his children to buy a house before his death, and other children can still go back.

The old man paid for his children to buy a house before his death, and other children generally can't go back Because this is a gift from the old man, that is, that person has the right to inherit, and others don't.

For property that has already been donated to others, the donor must not demand that it be returned. Therefore, if the elderly person has given his property to others, his children are not allowed to ask for the return of the old man after his death.

Legal AnalysisAccording to the provisions of current civil laws and regulations, the so-called gift contract refers to a contract in which the donor transfers his property to the donee without compensation. A gift contract is a promise contract. In other words, as long as the donor and the donee reach an agreement on the matters of the gift of property, the gift contract is established and takes effect, and the donor should transfer the ownership of the property to the donee in accordance with the provisions of the gift contract.

However, the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China provides that the donor may revoke his or her donation. Specifically, before the donor transfers the ownership of the donated property to the donee, the donor can revoke the gift and thus refuse to deliver the property. If the donated property has been transferred to the donee, the donor may not revoke the gift, unless the statutory conditions are met, such as the donee has seriously damaged the interests of the donor or his close relatives, the donee has not fulfilled the obligation to support the donor, etc.

If the donor has not revoked the gift in advance, and there is no revocation of the gift after the transfer of the property, the donated property belongs to the donee, the donor loses ownership, and the donor and his heirs may not demand the donee to return it. If the donor has made a guess about the distribution of the gifted property in his will or bequest, this part of the distribution is invalid.

Legal basis: Article 657 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: A gift contract is a contract in which the donor gives his property to the donee free of charge, and the donee expresses his acceptance of the gift. Article 658 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: The donor may revoke the gift before the transfer of the right to the donated property. The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply to notarized gift contracts or gift contracts that have the nature of public interest or moral obligations such as disaster relief, poverty alleviation, or assistance to the disabled, which must not be revoked in accordance with law.

Article 663 of the People's Republic of China Civil Fight Orange Code If the donee has any of the following circumstances, the donor may revoke the gift: (1) seriously infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of the donor or the donor's close relatives; (2) Failure to perform the obligation to support the donor; (3) Failure to perform the obligations agreed upon in the gift contract. The donor's right of revocation shall be exercised within one year from the date on which the donor knew or should have known the reasons for revocation.

Article 665 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where the person with the right of revocation revokes the donation, he may request the donee to return the donated property.