What are the forms of talent selection in China?

Whether it is the imperial examination in the royal society or the college entrance examination in today's society, it is the most suitable talent selection system for Chinese society!

Although many people will criticize test-oriented education.

But I'm going to say it anyway.

Because compared with the selection of management elites for society, China's talent selection system is more important than the form of mobility of a social class, even if sometimes the symbolic meaning is greater than the actual effect.

From a historical perspective, the biggest difference between China's political structure and that of the West is that it is unified and centralized.

In order to maintain this political structure, the main mode of movement between social classes cannot be accomplished by the natural flow of thousands of individuals, but needs to be dominated by **.

Our argument is that the discovery of talents should be based on the examination. In modern Chinese, "talent" refers to a person who has certain professional knowledge or special skills, performs creative labor, and contributes to society, and is a worker with high ability and quality in human resources. The examination-oriented examination is not equal to the examination-oriented education, it is a strict knowledge level appraisal method, the form has the characteristics of diversification, there are written and oral examinations, practical operations and other forms, can test the learning ability and other abilities of students; And there is a strong discipline that absolutely prohibits any cheating.

First of all, when looking at the gains and losses of a political system, we must use a historical perspective. Looking at historical decision-making with current cognition, it is undoubtedly mediocre and unreasonable. For example, the current state civil servant.

Every recruitment must be examined, written test plus interview and political review to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of the selection. In the Han Dynasty, filial piety was raised.

Under the system, as long as the local **** is promoted, then a person is likely to embark on a career, and today this is not a policy that makes the local governor say a word, how to maintain the normal operation of the country The talents needed for the future? But think about it the other way around, especially within the system.

In large state-owned enterprises and large foreign enterprises, the number of employees has risen.

In the Zhou Dynasty, it was mainly the Shiqing Shilu system.

Doctors and ministers generally rely on the patriarchal system.

to inherit, and there are also by virtue of military exploits. There are three ways to appoint this kind of talent, the self-recommendation and recommendation of the scholar, or being visited by the doctor and the secretary or even the monarch, or raising a guest, such as the four gentlemen of the Warring States.

Was there a selection mechanism at that time.

When selecting talents in China, we generally use two forms: written examination and interview, which can test the basic professional quality of the person, and the interview can test other parts.

In ancient times, there was a hereditary system, a imperial examination system, a selection system, and the most common one that has developed to the present is the college entrance examination system, which is the recruitment system of employers, the recruitment system of civil servants of state-owned enterprises, and the art examination system of some special students, as well as the promotion in the unit, the selection and recommendation system, the appointment system, and the appointment system.

When selecting talents, China will test students through selective examinations, test a student's political quality and professional level through examination results, and also examine candidates' ability to play on the spot, adapt to changes and express and communicate through interviews.

In our country, some large-scale job fairs will be held when selecting talents, and according to their majors, they will also select talents on the Internet, and interviews can be conducted at home.

Legal analysisThe criteria for selecting talents are as follows: 1. Have good professional ethics, and good professional ethics are extremely important for a person in the workplace; 2. Choose pragmatic people, pragmatic talents are willing to start from the basic work and can become the pillars of the team; 3. Good teamwork spirit can create greater value; 4. The basic knowledge should be solid; 5. Recognition of corporate culture; 6. The potential of job seekers.

Legal basisArticle 47 of the Employment Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China Local people at or above the county level and relevant departments shall encourage and guide enterprises to strengthen vocational education and training according to market demand and industrial development direction. Vocational schools and vocational skills training institutions shall maintain close ties with enterprises, implement the integration of production and education, serve economic construction, and cultivate practical talents and skilled laborers.

Enterprises shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, withdraw funds for the education of employees and conduct vocational skills training and continuing education and training for workers.

Summary. According to the definition of talent in the Outline of the National Medium and Long-term Talent Development Plan (2010 2020), talent refers to people who have certain professional knowledge or special skills, carry out creative labor and contribute to society, and are workers with high ability and quality in human resources. Talents mainly include party and government talents, management talents and professional and technical personnel.

Specifically, it can also be divided into management talents, management talents, technical talents and skilled talents. Management talents mainly refer to the heads of units and functional departments; Management talents mainly refer to the person in charge of party and government work; Technical personnel mainly refer to those with intermediate or above professional and technical qualifications or bachelor's degree or above; Skilled personnel mainly refer to those who work in production skill positions and have senior workers or above skill levels or professional and technical qualifications.

Your question has been received, it will take a little time to type, please wait a while, please don't end the consultation, you can also provide more effective information, so that I can answer for you more coarsely and dry.

Hello, I'm glad to answer for you: Hello Dear According to the definition of talent in the "Outline of the Medium and Long-term Talent Development Plan of the Troubled Country (2010 2020)", talent refers to a person with certain professional knowledge or special skills, who carries out creative work and contributes to the society, and is a worker with high ability and quality in human resources. Talents mainly include party and government talents, management talents and professional and technical personnel.

Specifically, it can also be divided into management talents, management talents, technical talents and skilled talents. Management talents mainly refer to the heads of units and functional departments; Management talents mainly refer to the person in charge of party and government work; Technical personnel mainly refer to those with intermediate or above professional and technical qualifications or bachelor's degree or above; Skilled talents mainly refer to those who work in production skill positions, have senior workers or above skill levels or have professional and technical qualifications. Hope it can help you, hope the service is satisfactory to you.

I've seen a news story before that a certain region of China once conducted a test of moral character (using a written test), and the result was criticized by most people. Because morality cannot be tested to be better or worse. You can give an example of the first aspect, the measures of the government should be reflected through the people, and how the official is will depend on his actual management and administrative level in office.

However, passing the written test can only test his theories and ideas, and there is a gap between theory and practice. From this point of view, I think there will be a breakthrough.

Secondly, did you notice? The focus of this debate is on the exam, and the discussion is whether the exam is the best way to do it. We just need to argue that exams are not the best way, but the question of what exactly is the best way to select talent is beyond the scope of the debate.

On the positive side of this rebuttal, no matter what the way, if the opponent really wants to pick a bone in the egg, you can't cite it at all. So I think it's a matter of counter-proof. First of all, if he is the best, then all the people selected are talents.

If a **, a court full of talents, then the country will surely prosper. Based on this assumption, let's take an example. That's a lot, let's focus on one.

The imperial examination system of the Ming and Qing dynasties imprisoned the minds of scholars, and if all the talents selected by such examinations were talents, then why did the Ming and Qing dynasties perish?

The opposing side should cite more disadvantages of the examination in the first debate to explain the concept and in the free debate. Secondly, carry forward the idea of picking bones in the egg, and find fault with the opponent's arguments, especially factual arguments. Of course, there is no factual argument to blame.

There is also the concept of controlling exams, which cannot be extended to metaphors, and what I am afraid of is that "exams are everywhere in life". Finally, exaggerate the harm.

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, the present, the moderator and the opponent's debaters.

Exams are just one way to select talents.

There are other ways to select talent, such as competitive recruitment. It is biased to miss the best method of seating in the examination, and different levels of talent should consider using different methods. The examination can be said to be a good method for the selection of universal talents, which can reflect fairness.

High-end talents should adopt the methods of qualification review, selection of the best of the best, and competitive recruitment. For example, China's high-end financial talents are selected from overseas through the above methods. Thank you for adopting and giving points.

Recommended by authoritative sources. Not as fair as the exam, but sometimes it's better to pick talent.

A good talent is an overview of all aspects, for people in a certain field, people who have knowledge in the corresponding field and will make reasonable use of their abilities.

For example, if a chef can make dishes that no one else can make and is very popular, then this person is a good talent among chefs.

But that aspect needs to have a knowledge base, so study hard.

Hello, glad to answer for you :

Excellent talents mainly include the following aspects:

1.Personal cultivation. Have a good attitude and character, deal with people and people, people and things can be considered comprehensively and handled properly.

2.Professional accomplishment. Have some experience with the work you do, including professional knowledge and experience.

3.Be responsible. Whether it is for family, work or others, there is a sense of responsibility.

Of course, it is beneficial, but if it is unreasonable to take an examination as the only criterion for measuring whether it is a talent, the current college entrance examination is actually not essentially different from the ancient imperial examination, but for those children who come out of poor places, there are many more opportunities, but if they go to work, they will face more things and greater pressure.

It is conducive to talent selection, but it is not conducive to talent training.