We had children before we got married. Now that there is a breakup, who will this child be sentenced

Friend, if she really decides to break up with you, it's better for you not to have children, we also have this situation over there, getting married before the age, (not getting a marriage certificate, only holding banquets, many rural towns are like this) gave birth to a child and broke up, the woman didn't want children, and got along with others, and in the end it was the man who suffered. If you are not old and want to find a good girl who has never been married, you must refuse children, how many people are willing to marry a man who is married for the second time and have a drag oil bottle? Unless you're rich.

If you want to have children, you will rewrite it for the rest of your life, and if you don't have children, you will still be a new version of yourself and can start a new life. People are selfish, she wants to start over, give the child to you, you can't start over, you must not leave the child because the parents want the child, a lesson from the past, the first floor is talking about fart, you must not believe him, why should a man bear the mistakes of a woman, but also take a lifetime, women in the fight with men for the right but put all the responsibility on the man, do you think it makes sense for you to bear alone? Remember, remember.

She is hesitant now, dissatisfied with you, or there are people outside, I think she definitely doesn't want to take the child away, if you insist on not having children, she may not leave, but her heart is still ready to move, and she can't guarantee that she won't be cuckolded outside in the future, if you can, it is recommended to give up on her, find a new one, change one is better than find a ready-made one, it's better than in addition to problems in the future, while you are young now, choose a partner well, you can't wait until middle age, it's hard to change. For example, don't mind: you insist on not having children now, she feels that it is difficult to find someone else with children, and she doesn't break up with you, but she is still restless in her heart, and when she has the opportunity in a few years, she may run away with someone else, or divorce again.

In this case, if you are sure that she is serious about showing dissatisfaction between you or wants to start a new love, it will be difficult for you to change her, just like you have always had a wish, and once you have the opportunity, you will definitely come true, and she will also fulfill her wish to leave you and start a new life.

Even if you have children, why do you say to break up so easily, young people think twice about everything, don't regret separating, I believe that you have love, you will give birth to children!

Now that you have children, don't break up easily, let's communicate well! If you really want to break up, the child is better with the mother.

Do you want to go through the legal process? I think it's private. You should both share the cost.

As for her proposal to break up, I think she definitely doesn't want to take the child, the child is innocent, if she doesn't want to take the child, you, as a man, should bear it, the cost is best to be clear and shared. If you want to go through the legal process, I'm not particularly proficient in that, so let's see what others say.

It depends on who you want custody of your children.

It is better not to separate if you have children, and if there are any problems that can be solved, they will be solved.

If she wants a child, then the law will definitely award it to the mother, and the child must be small. Unless there is proof that the woman does not have the financial means to support the child.

When a man should be soft, he should be soft.

Find a professional lawyer and ask .........

Let the child choose.

Both sides can be judged.

It depends on which of you has children, and whoever wants it belongs to whom

The ownership of the custody of the children shall be decided by the parties through negotiation. If the negotiation fails, the court will make a judgment on the specific ownership of the child from the perspective of what is most conducive to the healthy growth of the minor child.

Article 1086 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

After the divorce, the parent who does not directly raise the child has the right to visit the child, and the other parent has the obligation to assist.

The method and time for exercising visitation rights are to be agreed upon by the parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment.

Where the parent's visit to the child is detrimental to the child's physical and mental health, the people's court is to suspend the visit in accordance with law; When the reason for the suspension disappears, the visit should be resumed quietly.

If you are not married and have children, you have broken up, and the custody of the children is decided by both parties through negotiation. If the negotiation fails, the court will rule that the child is specifically owned and raised from the perspective that is most conducive to the healthy growth of the minor child. Although there is no specific provision in the law on the custody of unmarried children, it stipulates that children born out of wedlock have the same rights as children born in wedlock.

A child born out of wedlock, like a child born in wedlock, is the child of both parents, and both parents shall be jointly responsible for the upbringing and education until the child is able to live independently.

The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1071.

Children born out of wedlock enjoy the same rights as children born in wedlock, and must not be harmed or discriminated against by any organization or individual. A biological father or mother who does not directly raise a child born out of wedlock shall bear the maintenance of the minor child or an adult child who is unable to live independently. Eighty-four in the 1000th Inch Ruler.

The relationship between parents and children is not extinguished by the divorce of the parents. After divorce, the children are still the children of both parents, regardless of whether they are raised directly by the father or mother.

After divorce, parents still have the right and obligation to raise, educate and protect their children.

In the event of a divorce, children under the age of two shall be raised directly by their mothers. For children who have reached the age of two, and the parents fail to reach an agreement on the issue of child support, the people's court is to make a judgment based on the specific circumstances of both parties and in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the minor child. Where children have reached the age of 8, their true wishes shall be respected.

Who does the child belong to after the breakup of the child out of wedlock.

If a child is born out of wedlock, the child shall be handled in accordance with the "Several Specific Opinions of the Supreme Court on the Handling of Child Support Issues in the Trial of Divorce Cases by the People's Court".

1. Where both parents agree that a child under the age of two lives with the father and there is no adverse impact on the healthy growth of the child, it may be permitted.

2. Children under the age of two generally live with their mothers. If the mother has any of the following circumstances, she may live with the father:

a. Suffering from incurable infectious diseases or other serious diseases, and the children are not suitable to live with them;

b. There are conditions for raising children who do not fulfill their obligation to support them, and the father requires the children to live with them;

c. For other reasons, the child is unable to live with the mother.

3. For children over the age of two years, both the father and the mother require to live with them, and one party may be given priority if they have any of the following circumstances:

a. Have undergone sterilization or have lost their fertility due to other reasons;

b. The child has lived with the child for a long time, and changing the living environment is obviously detrimental to the healthy growth of the child;

c. There are no other children, and the other party has other children;

d. The child lives with him/her, which is beneficial to the child's growth, and the other party suffers from an infectious disease or other serious illness that cannot be cured for a long time, or has other circumstances that are not conducive to the child's physical and mental health, and it is not suitable to live with the child.

4. The conditions for raising children are basically the same for both fathers and mothers, and both parties require the children to live with them, but the children have lived alone with their grandparents or maternal grandparents for many years, and the grandparents request and have the ability to help the children take care of their grandchildren or grandchildren, which may be considered as a priority condition for children to live with their parents.

5. In the event of a dispute between the parents over the age of 10 over that a minor child over the age of 10 should live with his or her father, the child's opinion shall be taken into account.

6. On the premise that it is conducive to protecting the interests of the children, where both parents agree to take turns raising the children, it may be permitted.

I am not married, I have a child next to me, and I broke up, and the child has to be negotiated by the two of you to decide who it belongs to. In addition, Brother Sen can pay child support, and if the negotiation fails, he can file a lawsuit and sue the man to take a certain amount of child support.

You need to negotiate this yourself, if you can't negotiate, then you can only go to court to sue. The court will decide on a case-by-case basis.

If you both want to have children, then go to the court to sue and let the court decide, and that's it.