Which Yongzheng is more real, the real Yongzheng in history

A more common view is that there is a difference between the image of Yongzheng in the TV script and the TV script. Yongzheng, who is shown in Februaryhe's pen, is an emperor who is not only hard-working and promising, but also a ruthless and complex, scheming, and unsmiling "cold-faced king"; The audience generally believes that Yongzheng in the TV series is completely portrayed as an emperor who is stoic and resolute, worried about the country and the people, and lacks the complex character of Yongzheng in **. Which Yongzheng is more real?

On the occasion of Hainan Publishing House's launch of the TV literary script of "Yongzheng Dynasty", the reporter was invited to interview Mr. Liu Heping, the screenwriter of the play, and Ms. Hu Mei, the chief director. Liu, Hu and Februaryhe, the author of the original "Emperor Yongzheng" (Yangtze River Literary Edition), have their own opinions on this.

Before adapting the book "Emperor Yongzheng", Liu Heping bluntly said to February: "For the sake of the literary style of the TV script, I will make major changes to the original work, if you are not satisfied because of this, I will say to you 'I'm sorry' first!" Februaryhe's reply to Liu Heping at that time was, "Don't think about whether you're worthy of me Februaryhe, first of all, you have to be worthy of the audience."

With this sentence, Liu Heping said, "Februaryhe gave me a shoulder, and I stood up." ”

When the adaptation of the TV script of "Yongzheng Dynasty" was completed, after Februaryhe read the adapted script in Beijing, he congratulated Liu Heping, and at the same time expressed dissatisfaction and unaccustomed to the fact that individual characters and plots such as Yongzheng and Wu Sidao were quite different from the original work. In this regard, Liu Heping said that the adaptation of famous works should be faithful to the original, but they should not repeat the success of others. In order to make the plot more concentrated and meet the requirements of the TV series, it had to be recreated on the basis of **.

At the same time, he emphasized that without Februaryhe's "Emperor Yongzheng", there would be no today's "Yongzheng Dynasty" TV series.

Xie Xizhang, a critic who has deep doubts about the authenticity of Yongzheng's image, admitted that he doesn't like the Yongzheng Emperor played by Tang Guoqiang. Why do you deliberately portray Yongzheng as a positive character? Is that what it is?

The image of Yongzheng in folk and wild history is the non-essential image of Yongzheng, right? Is the show overturning the case of "Emperor Yongzheng" broadcast by ** 10 years ago?

According to Liu Heping, some historians say that "Yongzheng is the most diligent emperor in well-documented history." Not long ago, a symposium was held at ** University for Nationalities, and domestic authoritative Qing history experts agreed that the play basically and truly reproduces the image of Yongzheng. Liu Heping said that compared with "Emperor Yongzheng" broadcast on ** channel 10 years ago, "Yongzheng Dynasty" is not a reversal of the case, but also a correct name.

Director Hu Mei pointed out from a professional point of view that the Chinese screen needs to create a heroic image, the United States has a soldier Ryan, and Yongzheng in our history may have such and such faults and shortcomings, but this does not prevent us from affirming him and portraying him vividly.

Which 'Yongzheng' is not real, because the positive side and the anti-side are opposed, and they both look at a person from their own standpoint, and they will force some things to Yongzheng, which is what people usually call the theory of punishing the heart.

The Yongzheng Emperor of the Qing Dynasty was a legendary figure in history, impressing people with his outstanding talent, strong character, legendary political career, and contradictory ideas.

Yongzheng is really mean, but not unkind; Ruthlessness is really ruthlessness, but it is not ruthlessness. Yongzheng's statement that there was no official and unclear may be an exaggeration, but it is a fair evaluation of Yongzheng's governance. Yongzheng is undoubtedly a person with a great personality and an outstanding character.

He is emotional, strong-willed, resolute, sharp-eyed, and energetic.

According to the records of the official history, Emperor Yongzheng was a good emperor who was diligent and loved the people. He made countless batches every day, and he went to bed very late every day. But then again, the characteristics of the emperors of the Qing Dynasty are like this, every emperor is basically very diligent, and he can't find an emperor who only cares about his own pleasure.

He is a very good monarch. He was the backbone of the prosperous Kangqian era, and he insisted on diligent government all his life.

During his reign, Yongzheng vigorously promoted reforms, rectified corruption, advocated frugality, and was also the most diligent emperor in history.

Aixin Gioro Yinchen is worried about the decline of the Great Qing State, actively maintains the rule of the Great Qing State, the ability is some, the Han culture is more understanding, all his life is for the Great Qing State, the biggest blow to Yin Chen's life is the Lu Liuliang incident, Yin Chen directly spent four years to deal with this matter, compiling the Great Righteous Jue Puzzle, distorting and tampering, attacking the Han people's national consciousness and national spirit, enslaving the Han people, in which Yin Chen scolded the Chinese for being inferior to birds and beasts, and the reverse thief Lu Liuliang, etc., to Yi Di than birds, unknown heavens disgusted the interior without virtue, If according to the theory of traitors and thieves, it is not as good as the people of China who are all beasts, then why not have time to be in China and outside China, and they are proud and ridiculous. Give him a supplement, if the Chinese are inferior to the beasts, then the Qing country will eventually be destroyed by the flocks of beasts, isn't it even inferior to the beasts, and under certain conditions, the beasts will be more powerful than the beasts, so that the beasts will be afraid.

Historical sources prove that he was the most diligent emperor of all time. It can also be said that the emperor who worked the hardest and did not talk about personal enjoyment. History is a little unfair to him, and Kangxi Qianlong obscured his aura one after the other.

Kang Qian is recognized as an enlightened and good emperor, but Kang Qian's enlightened rule for so many years may be due to his generosity and virtue, which has led to the emptiness of the treasury, and the Yongzheng emperor has only a fraction of their time, and the treasury is fuller than theirs. This also proves that Yongzheng is indeed an emperor who works hard and spends frugally. I all know that Kangxi Qianlong has traveled to the south of the Yangtze River many times, but I have never heard of Yongzheng visiting the south of the Yangtze River.

The emperor rode thousands of times to the south of the Yangtze River, but it cost a lot of money. Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty once he traveled to the consequence of losing the world. Yongzheng may be reluctant to spend money and won't swim once.

Some people label him as mean and unkind, but he is also mean to himself. It was not easy for the emperor to do this.

Emperor Yongzheng was an excellent emperor of China.