Is there a big difference between the processor I3 330M and the I5 430M? Let s analyze it specifical

Now it's all about the i-series, and it's a quick comparison.

From the perspective of positioning, i7 is positioned as high-end, i5 is mid-range, and i3 is low-end.

Compare from the interface.

Among the i7 series CPUs, the i7 900 series has a 1366 interface and supports three channels, while the other series have a 1156 interface and supports dual channels.

Thread-wise.

Both the i7 900 and i7 800 have 4 cores and 8 threads.

The i5 700 is 4 cores and 4 wires.

The i5 600 i5 500 i3 series are all dual-core 4-thread.

In other words, only the i5 700 series does not support hyper-threading technology.

In terms of support for Turbo Boost technology (Core Auto Acceleration Technology).

Both i7 and i5 are supported, while i3 is not.

In terms of specificity, the i3 integrates a graphics GPU, others do not.

Explanation of the test differences between the i3 i5 i7.

Laptops based on Core i processors have gradually become popular in the market, but for many consumers, there are still many doubts in their hearts - choose a more cost-effective dual-core Core i5 i3, or spend an extra 1000 yuan 2000 yuan to choose a quad-core Core i7?

As we can see from the test results we obtained, the actual test performance of the i5-540M processor in the Cinebench R10 test is actually only about 3% different from the i7-620M, in addition, the results of most processors in the 3D performance test are basically the same, except for the i3-330M, the difference between the performance of other processors is very small. In particular, the i7-620M, which is considered to be the most powerful in the 3D Mark 06, did not achieve as much as the i3-330M.

Judging from the actual results of some large-scale 3D game tests, the frame rate of these dozen processors is about 20 frames per second, regardless of whether they are high, medium or low. This shows that the difference in graphics performance is not too big, and that even the strongest i7-620M is a must for better entertainment performance.

In today's situation, the Core i5 i3 processor is more than enough to support most applications, and the Core i7 may not be necessary. This is not the same as the situation where the Core 2 Duo series processors replaced single-core processors strongly. We also saw in the actual test that compared with the i7, the i5 is not very different in some performance, and the individual results can almost reach the same, so it seems that the i5's cost performance is still beyond doubt.

From the perspective of daily applications, whether it is office, games, or **** and ** processing, the dual-core Core i5 processor does not show a significant lag behind the quad-core Core i7 processor, and the statement of insufficient performance does not exist for daily applications at all. Overall, we don't recommend buying a Core i7 laptop for most users, after all, it's not wise to spend thousands of dollars more to get a performance boost that you can't actually feel, and it also comes with higher power consumption. The dual-core Core i5 or Core i3 platform is what everyone should focus on.

Roundup: i54200m. The two processors are notebook processors, and thanks to the new architecture, the i54200M is a little better in terms of performance, but the difference between the two is very small.

i54200M is Intel Core fourth-generation CPU, at the same frequency, it is definitely better than the fourth generation than the third generation, there are advantages in structure, and if you have different frequencies, the high frequency is good.

Introduction:

Intel is a global leader in the semiconductor industry and computing innovation since 1968. Today, Intel is transforming into a data-centric company. Intel is working with partners to drive innovation and application breakthroughs in transformative technologies such as artificial intelligence, 5G, and the intelligent edge to drive a smart, connected world.

I am a college student of Xingtai University,Tens of thousands of college students here use what brand of notebook have,Don't blindly pursue big brands,Use Shenzhou and Acer These cost-effective brands are used from freshman to senior,There is no difference in actual use,i54210There is no difference between i34000,But there will be a difference when playing games,If you just play the alliance, choose i3 group 940 graphics card,Enough for you to play the full open special effect,There is also to choose a good screen, If the resolution is poor, you'll complain after a long time.,Thank you for adopting.,Mine is Shenzhou's.,Don't listen to those black Shenzhou's.,But there are more Lenovos in college.,Lenovo's quality personal feeling is a little better than Shenzhou.,But treat it the same well.,Don't buy a business book to play the alliance.,It's going to be bad.,Business book buy Lenovo HP Dell,Acer is better but more expensive,Because the screen Acer is equipped with LCD screen IPS,Don't choose HP's game book on the line,My classmates have any brand.,HP game book is very poor., At least in the school, the HP Shadow Elf repair rate is still quite high, mostly because of the screen and motherboard, he has the worst heat dissipation, and the motherboard is well worked, but I'm sorry that his ** is too expensive,

GT840M and GT645M are of the same level, and the main purpose of playing games is decisive i5 3210M, and his main turbo frequency reaches dual-core full speed. More than 300 yuan is not cost-effective. Combined with brothers, your own game is the best,You can go to the official website to check what the maximum CPU requirement for the game you play is,If the requirements are not high, i3 4000M is enough。

Personally, I think,It's still i5It's good,Because when playing games, switch to the desktop and reply to a message or something, it's very costly, and I'm reluctant to look at the brother, you choose.。

i5 520M is better, the reason is that i5 520M belongs to the generation i5, and i3 380M belongs to the generation i3, it is obvious that the former has stronger performance, which can also be reflected in the parameters, i5 520M has a higher frequency, and supports turbo frequency, the parameters of the two are as follows:

Intel Core i5 520M Parameters:

Applicable Type: Notebook;

CPU series: Core i5 mobile;

CPU Frequency: ;

Slot type: LGA 1156;

Number of pins: 1156pin;

Number of cores: Dual cores;

Number of threads: Four threads.

Intel Core i3 380M Parameters:

Applicable Type: Notebook;

CPU series: Core i3;

CPU Frequency: ;

Max Turbo Frequency: Turbo frequency is not supported;

Slot Type: PGA988;

Number of pins: 988pin;

Number of cores: Dual cores;

Number of threads: Four threads.

But the i3-380M is and the i5-520M is! Whether it's good or not depends on how high the frequency is! It's to look at the core and bits, encapsulated and made! According to your understanding, Celeron is better than that.

i5 has automatic overclocking, the system detects, if this program makes your CPU run, when the amount of data processing is relatively large, automatically increase the frequency of the CPU, such as CPU, the system gives you overclocking, so that your computer can run this program or software game faster. Well, the data I'm using for analogy isn't necessarily accurate, but it's pretty much the same. The exact number is different depending on your CPU model.

Regarding heating, it does increase a certain amount of heating, but it is not very big, because, the heating ratio of the CPU itself and the heating ratio of the graphics card is a small thing, and secondly, this automatic overclocking is not always maintained at the frequency after overclocking, therefore, the heat is not as big as imagined. Hope it helps!

The performance of the CPU is related to the microarchitecture, the number of cores, the main frequency, and the cache, and the first three have a very obvious impact.

The Core i3 380M and Core i3 2310M have the advantage of a very high clock speed, while the latter has the advantage of adopting a new SNB architecture for higher execution efficiency.

The new SNB architecture has about 15% improvement in product performance compared to the same positioning. Therefore, although the Core i3 2310M only has a clock speed, the performance is about the same as that of the previous generation. Therefore, it is between the i3 350m and the i3 370m.

Slightly inferior to the i3 380m

However, since they are all strong enough, there is no obvious difference in practice, and the actual power consumption of the i3 2310M is lower, so if the ** is the same, I recommend you to choose the i3 2310M

Both of these statements are correct, the CPU part 380M is indeed slightly stronger than the 2310M, the GPU part is 2310M stronger, LZ can wait for the follow-up model of SNB, and the main frequency will be somewhat improved.

The i3 2310M's GPU is automatically used when it is used with a GPU when it is used with a GPU for simple graphics operations, and when it is used for complex operations (large game graphics processing software). This has a more obvious effect on reducing power consumption for notebooks, while there is not much difference between CPUs. It is recommended to buy a notebook with i3 2310m.

If you are engaged in technology, it is recommended that 2310 I3 380 not talk about windows Play other systems, sometimes this "soft support" is still not as good as the "hard support" of 2310, including virtualization or something.

And the power consumption of the 2310 is much lower than that of the 380 390, although it is slightly inferior to the 380 390.

But the stability and performance of the 2310 are beyond doubt.

Both statements are true,In addition,I3 2310M heating power is smaller than i3 380M,At present, the second generation i3The main frequency is too low and does not support turbo frequency technology,Worse than the old generation of high-frequency i3,The gap between the second generation and the first generation is only reflected in the i7,The second generation i7 kills the first generation i7 (only refers to the notebook platform)

If you want to play 3D games, it is recommended to buy at least one with a mid-range independent GPU, and the built-in GPU of the second-generation i7 is only at the level of a low-end independent GPU, let alone the i3.