How much is an astronomical telescope that can see the craters of the moon at least

It is better to see the moon in the catadioptric type, Maca. However, if it is less than 1,000, it is not possible to buy a horse card under normal circumstances. Basically, there is only a refraction type, the domestic Boguan is OK, the foreign 1000 can't be won, you can look at the Boguan pioneer, the cost performance is still OK.

I don't know what you mean by saying clearly, you can see it, I don't know how clear you are, I used Boguan 70 900 before 900 to buy, I don't know how it is now, it feels good to use. There are also phoenixes and wolves in China. I haven't used it, I heard that it's not good, don't buy miscellaneous cards, I still agree with Boguan, and the entry is probably cheaper than the refraction of the hundred.

Or you can buy a 70mm caliber large binocular, Boguan Falcon 15*70 is OK, in fact, I think the binoculars are better, it is also convenient to carry, and it is not expensive, and novices are also suitable for using binoculars first.

Or do you want to make your own? Hehe! I've always had this idea, to do a big reflex, and I haven't acted yet. o(∩_o~

Look at the selection yourself.

It is not difficult to see the crater, a 7x 8x telescope can perceive the three-dimensional sense, and the larger the multiple, the more details you can see.

For novices, multiples are easier to get acquainted with the sky, 7x35 binoculars are a good choice, and the famous planets, nebulae can be tried.

I have an old Sky Wolf D-60T, and I don't know if you want it, but this picture is the moon that I photographed with 60T.

I've bought one with a maximum of 520 times, usually five or six hundred times is enough, and *** costs three or four hundred.

If you go to ** to buy the Sirius D50 model, it's about 240.

More than 100, but I don't know how to do it! You can go to ......Pick me pick me pick me thank you thank you.

To put it simply, the more expensive it is, the clearer it can be seen, and the farther it can be seen. The farther and more beautiful ones, such as Orion and Andromeda, are really beautiful in telescopes. Astronomical telescopes are a bottomless pit, so it is recommended to focus on budget.

**The more 0s that are followed by the clearer it is, of course. Just looking at the moonlight, in fact, a few hundred dollars of toys are enough. The binoculars are also a good choice and should be recommended by many people.

In fact, if the budget is enough, it is better to buy a telephoto SLR, which is more versatile and has a much better effect than an astronomical telescope.

Just get started, choose the Syntron 80EQ and give it a try. Q: What is the difference between 80DX and 80EQ? It's just that there is no difference in the actual effect of observation, it will be more stable, and the jitter will be smaller when observing.

Do your basic homework before entering the pit. Newton's reflecting telescope, I think the name is very good, in fact, it depends on the budget, and if it is suitable, it is not a professional hobby.

Generally, the caliber (calculated in mm) is to twice (folk formula). The limit of a common 80-aperture telescope is about 120 times. You'll know how it works when you've used it yourself.

The eyepiece has a parameter called the exit pupil distance, the smaller the focal length, the shorter the exit pupil distance, which means that you have to get closer, basically less than 6mm eyepieces, people with glasses can't see it. In addition to the well-known refracting telescopes, telescopes also include reflective telescopes and reflex telescopes. After Newton invented the reflecting telescope in 1668, it has achieved great development, and the current scientific research community mainly relies on reflecting telescopes, which have the advantage of theoretically having no chromatic aberration.

If you can, you can go to the suburbs to see it, and on a clear night, even in the city center, you can see a lot of stars with binoculars. Moreover, there are special star sky reserves in the world, and it is now being proposed that there may be protected areas in China in the future. For children, you should also buy regular binoculars, children may have more difficulty lifting, you can buy another adapter to connect to the tripod.

And don't let your child watch it for too long at a time to avoid visual fatigue.

The Webb telescope can clearly see the mountains on the surface of the moon, because the sensitivity of the Webb telescope is very high, and the price is very expensive.

Webb telescopes, generally professional telescopes are OK, but they are too expensive for ordinary people to need at all.

The Webb Astronomical Telescope and the Kepler Telescope are all mountains that can clearly see the surface of the moon.

In general, the best observations of a suitable telescope are those that can see details of the lunar surface, such as impact craters and mountains. And to see the craters on the moon clearly, you need some telescopes with larger apertures.

According to the experience of professionals, using a telescope with a diameter of about 100 mm (4 inches), the details of the lunar surface and the shape of the crater can be clearly observed. If you want to see more detail and a clearer crater, you need to use a telescope with a larger aperture, such as a telescope with an aperture of 150-200 mm (6-8 inches).

Of course, the repentant vision of observing the surface of the moon is also related to many other factors, such as the weather conditions at the time of observation, the time of observation, the altitude of the observation site, etc.

The largest crater on the Moon is the huge impact crater called the Krattle crater, which has a diameter of about 117 kilometers, and other large craters such as the Albitani crater and the Loch crater are also more than 50 kilometers in diameter. If you want to see these craters clearly, you need to use a telescope that is large enough.

In general, a telescope with a diameter of 10-12 cm pins can see some details on the lunar surface, including the lunar sea, mountains, and impact craters. If you want to observe smaller details, such as craters, you need to use a larger telescope. It is believed that with a telescope of more than 20 centimeters in diameter, it is possible to clearly see some of the smaller features on the lunar surface, including craters.

If you use a larger telescope, such as an astronomical telescope with a diameter of 50 centimeters or more, you can see more detailed features of the lunar surface.

The so-called "craters on the moon", that is, craters, are not so difficult to "see".

The Copernicus crater pointed to by the arrow in the figure below is the most conspicuous crater on the front side of the moon, with a diameter of 93 kilometers, which is a very ordinary scale among the large craters on the lunar surface - the Apollo crater on the far side of the moon has a diameter of more than 500 kilometers. Copernicus is conspicuous because of its location and the bright radial streaks around it, which stretch for thousands of kilometers.

A sighted person can see the crater with no difficulty with the naked eye, but certainly not as much detail as in the image below, which was taken with a 14-inch catadioptric telescope and a planetary camera.

Targets that can be seen with the naked eye, plus telescopes (not fakes) can only be clearer, and there is no such thing as a target that can be seen with the naked eye but is invisible with a telescope - the bar is distracted, and the telescope may have difficulty catching fast-moving targets, but it is by no means invisible.

In other words, as long as you use a telescope, as long as the telescope you use is really a telescope and not a model in the form of a skeleton, even if it is made of discarded spectacle lenses, you can see the crater on the moon at no cost at all.

First of all, telescopes, which can be roughly divided into hand-held and tabletop tripods, standard hand-held telescopes (standard multiples of 7 to 10x), "just can" "barely" "start" to see.

Therefore, the hand-held one is not very suitable for looking at the crater on the moon.

Speaking of desktop tripods, generally, 20 times (20 ports in parameters), you can clearly see the crater. And you can clearly see some details.

40 times, (40 ports in the parameter) can see some details very clearly. Basically, this is the best multiple for observing the Moon! Because no matter how small the multiplier is, it is not enough, and no matter how large it is, it is too affected by the air current, and it looks blurry.

This is also my personal experience.

In fact, for professional astronomy enthusiasts, it is not simply the pursuit of multiples, the reason is simple, to pass through such a thick atmosphere, the larger the multiple, the heavier the interference. Basically, multiples of more than 80 times have no practical meaning.

At the same time, it is also necessary to remind that a very important condition for observing the moon is not to observe it during the full moon, which is not visible, it is better to wait until the half moon, because of the angle of light, the crater at the junction of yin and yang is very clear.

However, the parameters mentioned above are regular parameters, and now many products are marked with 9999 50 20 30, which are indiscriminately marked. It is recommended to take a look.

Common Sense and Discernment".

Finally, if you buy a telescope just to see the moon, then the hand-held one is not suitable.

In fact, several craters on the moon can be seen with the naked eye.

As long as the telescope is not in question, it will definitely be able to see a lot of craters on the moon. Generally, craters with a diameter of more than 10 km are no problem.

About 10 times more can see several larger craters.

1.Inside the Universe The universe as we know it is only the tip of the iceberg, and the universe is so large that the Hubble telescope can only photograph galaxy clusters.

2.As for whether you can see the surface of the moon, the answer is of course yes, astronomical telescopes can survey the moon, and you can clearly see the structure of the moon and the craters ...... when the moon is fullYou can also use it to see galaxies or clusters of galaxies (usually with binoculars).

3.As for **, known as the rookie mirror Star Tran 80EQ can survey the Moon, Jupiter, Mars, Saturn, galaxy clusters ......Only 800+ RMB is required.

4.Finally, astronomy is a sacred subject, and I am fascinated by its vastness and antiquity, and even more so by looking up at the stars at night. If the landlord likes astronomy, I can recommend you books, such as "Stargazing at Night", "Popular Astronomy", "Basic Astronomy", ......Even a documentary Go to astronomy more, shepherd astronomy network to wander around you will grow knowledge!

The ultra-high-powered astronomical telescopes in the science academies should do the trick.

Look at the quality of your telescope!! Looking at the lunar crater is absolutely OK, Saturn is hard to say, my astronomical telescope has a diameter of 113mm, a focal length of 900, reflective, you can see Jupiter as big as a soybean, Saturn is farther away than Jupiter, it is even smaller, you don't think that those Saturn photos on the Internet were taken on the earth, most of them were taken by Hubble or artificial satellites, and the optical telescope of the observatory cannot see many details.

Astronomical telescopes with an aperture of 80mm or more can see Saturn. You can take a look at it.

Big brother. How can it be 570 times! I've been playing for so long, and the mirror is up to 80+... The field of vision is already very small, very dark. Maybe I have some light pollution in the city... But 570 times I still don't dare to think about it.

Ordinary binoculars can see the moon more than 20 times. The Moon is the closest celestial body to us, and it doesn't require much ...

Generally speaking, the maximum magnification cannot exceed twice the millimeter of the objective lens, but generally more than 100 times, there are too many factors that determine the observation.

It is impossible to see clearly if you want to see an ant on the moon (assuming it exists).

If you want to see the crater, you can easily achieve it with a 200x astronomical telescope.

Yes, even though your telescope is 570 times more impressive, you might be able to see a 500-meter crater on the moon.

What model, what configuration, 570 times may be deceived by the merchant, telescope effective magnification = objective lens aperture, so converted, your telescope's aperture is 380 mm = 38 cm?! This is too thunderous, you can see the moon 45 times, and you can see the crater 100 times.

500 times higher, but not particularly high, nothing.