Compared with the United Kingdom, what are the characteristics of the United States in the mode of s

Separation of powers, checks and balances.

The United States is a republic, so the United States is a division of powers, Congress and the courts, the United States is very clear, but Britain is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy, the British constitutional monarchy has been established for more than 300 years, during which there have been several changes, and I will not go into detail here.

The checks and balances of power are very important institutional guarantees in the democratic process of the country, which ensures that it is impossible to form""Unlimited rights" has institutionally contributed to the development of modern democracy.

As for the United States, there are many reasons for choosing the separation of powers. After the independence of the United States in 1783, there were two main systems in the capitalist world at that time: one was the British hypocrisy representative system, and the other was the separation of powers first realized in the United States by the French born in England, and the United States chose this system because of the specific national conditions at the time of its independence

After independence, the United States still had to face the colonial war with Britain, so it needed a strong ** to lead, and after independence, it also needed a strong ** to lead the people to recover the economy; The leaders of Washington, Madison, and Hamilton at the beginning of the founding were all staunch factions of the separation of powers, and so on. The separation of powers system is greater than the British virtual monarchy representative system, and the head of state has greater powers, so the United States finally chose the separation of powers system out of practical considerations. The Western capitalist political system is an ideological system that has emerged since the European Renaissance, and many of its things cannot be explained in one sentence or two, and must be understood in light of the specific situation at that time.

Britain is a constitutional monarchy, and the United States is a republic."

A constitutional monarchy has a monarch, that is, a king, but the power of the king under this system has been greatly weakened and has no real power. Real power is in the hands of the elected prime minister. So Britain has a queen, but it's the prime minister who really deals with national affairs, like Churchill in World War II.

It is to be elected from all parties through **. And the royal family is inherited and hereditary.

** republic, since it is a republic, there must be a senatorial election, so the ** republican system is elected by the Senate**, and then ** exercises state power, appoints important state workers, and deals with domestic and foreign affairs, but at the same time is constrained by the parliament and cannot cover the sky with one hand.

First, it is based on the representative system and reflects the will and interests of different social groups with the help of different representative bodies;

Second, the legislature implements a bicameral system, and there are differences in the social bases and interests of the two chambers, so as to achieve mutual checks;

third, the establishment of a single executive head, who has executive and appointment powers, and veto power over legislation;

Fourth, the independence of the judiciary;

Fifth, with the exception of judges, the main ones are elected through a certain form of election.

Embodied in the consideration of the interests of the United States and the local, the United States federal ** holds political, economic, military and diplomatic powers, and the states have a certain degree of autonomy without violating the Constitution, such as local education, health, etc., reflecting the combination of centralization and decentralization, the United States state power is divided into three parts: legislative power, executive power and judicial power These three parts of power remain independent of each other Theoretically, the three powers are completely equal, and check and balance each other Each power has the function of restricting the abuse of the other two powers This is the well-known principle of separation of powers in modern democracies