Why India can t become a second China .

1. Population and education. India has empty populations, and those populations are just numbers, simple numbers. More than half of the population is a pure illiterate person who doesn't know a word, but how many illiterate people in China do you find who don't know words?

After China's large-scale popularization of basic education, the population can adapt to the era of digital industrialization and become excellent workers, so it can enjoy the demographic dividend. India? There are only a few schools in the whole country, and universal education is empty talk, let alone a demographic dividend.

2. Infrastructure, an important factor in China's rapid development is the large-scale construction of roads, railways and other roads, high-speed railways, airports, etc. in the last century, and infrastructure construction was carried out under the pressure of being scolded by the people of the whole country. To get rich, you have to build roads, and it turned out to be a very wise move, and transportation is a necessary factor in economic development. India doesn't have it, the infrastructure is a mess, there are not many railways in the country, and the country still helps to repair it.

Still preaching all day long to surpass China, how can it be surpassed?

3. The caste system, although the caste system in India is legally the best, but the people's minds are still stuck in the caste system, on the one hand, they talk about themselves as a model country of democracy, but on the other hand, they don't feel anything about the enslavement of the lower castes by the high castes. It's ...... like a ghostWhen China was founded in the last century, Grandpa Mao said that women can hold up half the sky and truly achieve equality, even now it is surpassed. Indian women, basically have to do all the work, men can not work.

There is also the saying that 100 million people and 1 billion beasts, the ideas are not equal, and I don't understand how they say that they are democracies.

4. Long-term planning, from the aspect of building highway infrastructure, it can be seen that China's party has a very high vision, planning step by step, and can formulate a development plan for decades, step by step to realize, and will not rush for quick success. And India didn't, what about India, 30 years ago, the military was much stronger than China, but all kinds of buying, buying, buying, buying more, began to be arrogant, to develop its own fighter jet, the glorious fighter, to kill this and that, tossing for more than 30 years finally succeeded, and then ......China's fifth-generation aircraft have all come out, and the brilliance is only three generations, while India is boasting that it wants to kill China's fifth-generation aircraft in seconds, and then as soon as the third-generation brilliance comes out, they began to shout that they want to build their own fifth-generation fighters and directly cross the fourth-generation aircraft ......Hmmm......I don't know what to say.

The caste system alone is destined to be impossible for India to develop as well as China.

China's means of production are publicly owned, and it is very easy for the state to use the country's manpower, material, and financial resources to carry out super projects. India has private ownership of land, and it is very difficult to acquire land for engineering construction.

China's state power is concentrated in ****, and the local government must obey it. India's **** has limited power, cannot command the states**, and cannot mobilize the strength of the whole country.

The equality of all ethnic groups in China is truly achieved. The Indian caste system cannot**.

Science and technology are the primary productive forces, and China relies on science and technology to rejuvenate the country. Religion hinders the development of productive forces, and India is a religious country.

Yes, here's why:

1. Economy.

At the moment, it seems difficult. With 70% of India being illiterate and semi-literate, coupled with an entrenched caste system being the biggest obstacle to India's emergence as an advanced industrial nation, it seems that no Indian politician can change this.

Helping to promote economic development of the "population."

The "window" will also end in China in 2020, but will last until 2035 in Indonesia, 2040 in Malaysia and 2045 in India. China is expected to have a trillion-dollar economy by 2030, compared to India's trillions of dollars. But India's economic growth "will remain high for the foreseeable future, and will continue to grow even when China's economy slows."

The report also notes that the biggest challenge for China's most populous democracy compared to its "highly centralized political system" is the deadlocked parliamentary electoral system.

China and India have a border dispute with reference to the Sino-Indian War.

China has helped India's enemy Pakistan Referring to the Indo-Pakistani War, China's border guards defeated India's ace army and almost hit New Delhi Of course, India does not admit that the Sino-Indian war was indeed won by China, but because China had too many enemies at that time, there were enemies all around, and China was forced to withdraw due to the pressure of the international situation China has helped Pakistanis in many places, and they are very friendly to the Chinese, and that is the case now.

The Indians say they won the war, and they say they want to be ashamed, which is a paradoxical argument because they lost to China, and China helped their enemy, Pakistan, so they hate Chinese Chinese and they hate India, and now they still occupy Chinese territory, so the relationship is very poor.

First, India is lacking.

There are few strong ethnic minorities like the Han people, so it is difficult to think.

DAO to unify, second, ancient India was relatively peaceful, although there were nomads who attacked from the Indus River, but most of them were relatively peaceful, since it was peaceful, then there would be no idea of reporting to the group for warmth, third, there were more Hindu sects, different and no sect was strong, and fourth, the harsh environment in southern India was a wild area in ancient times, and it was not easy to rule even if it was defeated.

You can write a book or even a book. In a nutshell, history and civilization are not the same.

The Republic of India, abbreviated as "India", is located in South Asia and is the largest country in the South Asian subcontinent. It is bordered by Bangladesh, Nepal and Bhutan to the northeast, Myanmar to the east, Sri Lanka to the southeast, and Pakistan to the northwest.

Ancient India is one of the four great civilizations, and the Indus civilization was born in 2500 BC. Around 1500 BC, the Aryans of Central Asia entered the subcontinent, conquered the local ancient Indians, established a number of small slave states, and established a caste system, and Vedic religion began to develop into Brahmanism. In the 4th century BC, the Mauryan Empire unified India and began to promote Buddhism, which spread outward.

When hell freezes over. 1. Some people say that India has the largest labor force.

In the industrial age, skilled labor is the labor force, and people with lofty ideals in the Indian education circle have counted: 58% of Indian fifth-grade students do not know the simple calculation of the second grade, but there are too few such people in India, and it is difficult to integrate into the social situation. The so-called literacy is actually to be able to write their own names in the local language, some people will say that the standard of illiteracy in India cannot be so low, the state is different from state to state, in fact, this is the case, whether illiterate or operable, can go to university, there are two kinds, one is the rich, the other is the reservation system for the untouchables, accounting for about 30% of the number of admissions, and the score is 100-150 points to go to college, not the untouched high caste, to 500 points, Indian college students are few, and Indian universities are very bad, That's it, the source of students is still very poor.

It's really not as good as China in the 1950s, when China's education was still relatively poor, but it was much stronger than India's now, Chinese studious, during the three major transformation periods, the whole people read, and the peasants went to school on the back of the ox to learn mathematics. At that time, China's whole people learned primary school knowledge, so that the quality of the population was much better than before the liberation, and then look at India, as I said earlier, the fifth grade is not as good as the second grade, and it is not easy to graduate from high school, but the level is not as good as our primary school graduates. Not to mention China after the reform and opening up, and more importantly, India, which will not be corrected.

2. Some people say that India is the largest market.

Where there is money, there is a market, what kind of market is a group of poor people? If a large number of people is a market, then the European powers would not need to engage in colonies, and Africans have the most people, is it a market? Obviously not, this doesn't need to be said too much, anyone with a brain understands it.

3. Democracy.

In addition, India has never been a democracy, and the inequality between men and women is surprising to modern people, even the most unequal era in Chinese history is more equal than India, and even people are not equal, where does democracy come from?

The meaning of democracy, from ancient Greece to Protestant ethics, the basis of democracy is 1. equality between people; 2. Objective rationality; 3. Have a common goal to build a city-state. Don't talk about India, it's just that Britain, France and the United States can't be democratic, taking the United States as an example, black lives are more expensive for 200 years, and people are equal? Objective rationality?

Look at the fools of neoliberalism, where does objectivity come from? Where does rationality come from? , a common goal?

Building a city-state? Where is the common goal of partisan struggle? The most developed countries do not have high-speed rail, no infrastructure, how to build a city-state?

There are really no democracies in the West, and if you have to come up with a democracy in the world, look at the first three, I think only China is the closest.

I think it will. Since independence in 1947, Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru has pursued a non-aligned strategy that seeks to avoid participation in the Cold War and prioritize multilateral institutions and the Non-Aligned Movement. India's policy has also been consistently opposed to the use of military force in international relations.

However, India has found that the post-cold-war international environment is conducive to expanding bilateral relations with all major powers at the same time, so India has pursued a strategy of "multiple alliances" and has sought to become a "transitional force" that sometimes competes with each other. As India began to assert itself as a regional power, it is today transforming its "brown water" navy into a "blue water" navy and expanding the power of its air force, actively participating in world affairs.

It is now widely accepted that India's rise is an inevitable great power. Over the past twenty-five years, the Indian economy has shown phenomenal growth. Despite the global economic slowdown, India remains one of the few large economies that continues to grow at a high-single-digit rate.

There is no doubt that India's economy will soon surpass that of the United Kingdom, France and other economies, and the United States has been strategically betting on India's rise in recent decades in the hope that it will advance American interests in Asia and globally. However, India is facing a series of objective realities such as relatively backward infrastructure.

Even if it rises, it is impossible to be the first in the world, at most the second in the world, the relationship between China and India is like Britain and France in the century, China is equivalent to Britain, and India is equivalent to France, that is to say, even if India rises at most, it is the second in the millennium, because China and India were founded at almost the same time, and when China is weakened, India should also be weakened, so it is meaningless to talk about not surpassing or not surpassing, and it is always another power younger than him to replace one power.

Not in the short term, India is divided into religions, states have a high degree of autonomy, the population is poor and the illiteracy rate is high, to put it bluntly, it is uneducated and uneven.

No, Hitler's words were inferior to those who were conquered by the Aryans.

The main constraint on China's current reputation as a developing country is the poor population and the unbalanced development of various regions. Many remote mountainous areas have poverty-stricken counties and villages. The per capita income is not yet as high as that of the world's developed countries.

This has something to do with our large population. But we have a good infrastructure. Compared with a developed country like India, it is not a little bit stronger.

Although China's economy is large, there are still certain problems.

1.Unbalanced development, urban-rural duality.

The structure is particularly distinctly specialized. China's current urbanization rate is about 58%, which is lower than the level of about 80% in developed countries. The income gap between urban and rural residents in China is large, and the disposable income of urban residents is twice that of rural residents.

2.Development is insufficient, and the per capita level is still below the world average. Some Western** calculations of China's data based on purchasing power parity are incorrect.

3.Development is faced with the problems of unsustainable original models and the need for transformation and upgrading. The overall level of China's social productive forces is still not high, and the structure of productive forces is still there.

4.Development faces the problem of not being understood. At present, China is shifting from high-speed development to a high-quality development stage to meet the people's aspirations for a better life.

A: Developing countries are both objective and subjective; It is not only internationally recognized, but also self-recognized.

China is only on the upper side of development among developing countries, and India is on the low side of development among developing countries, of course, it is also a developing country, and its development depends on the national level, only Hong Kong and Macao have reached a highly developed level, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai and the Pearl River Delta region have reached a relatively developed level, and the whole country has not reached the same level.