I need practice questions for copositional clauses! Hurry, hurry, hurry! Thank you!

Updated on educate 2024-03-04
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The object clause should be in declarative word order.

    eg:iasked

    himhow

    oldhewas.

    idon't

    knowwhat

    hisname

    is.Actually, what

    isthematter?and what

    iswrong?It is all declarative word order, so there is no need to change the word order in the object clause. It can be said that mum

    askedmewhat

    wasthe

    matter.or mum

    askedmewhat

    waswrong.

    So strictly speaking, there should be no correct answer to this question.

    If you look at the intent of the question, this question not only examines word order, but also examines tenses, and excludes ab according to tense (past tense), in cd, the d term is definitely not right because what

    iswrong itself is the order of the subjective table statement (there is no other way to understand it, because wrong is an adjective and cannot be a subject), and the object clause should also be said as what

    waswrong.And in item c, what is used

    isthematter's statement word order, what

    isthematter?Translated as "What's wrong?" ", stipulating it is the declarative word order (i.e., what is the subject, is the verb, the

    matter is a predicate), but formally, it can also be said to be the

    matter is the subject, is is the verb, and what is the predicate, so its declarative word order becomes what

    thematter

    is, so there is answer c.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Hello, happy to answer your questions.

    The correct answer is c

    This is the definite clause, the antecedent is person, and in the clause it is the object component clause like this: the nurse is talking to the doctor

    Therefore, the relative pronoun part should be used to whom or put to at the end, and the front should be followed by whom or without antecedents, and only C can be used here.

    Good luck with your learning and progress.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The doctor is logically the object of the definite clause, and the relative pronoun whom can be omitted.

    The adjective clause is taken out, that is: the nurse is talking to the doctorReplace the doctor with whom and omit whom

    The preposition to cannot be omitted.

    Hope that helps (* hee hee......

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    C First of all, set from, exclude D

    Then, a is missing.

    b is missing

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The time planning bureau is in line with the company.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    1.Here the subjunctive mood is used to indicate speculation. So fill in as if and don't fill in that

    2.mistake is in the passive form, apparently as a transitive verb. So the object needs to be followed by it. The conjunction, where, can be understood as at which. This gives us which acts as the object of mistake.

    3.Here is the copositional clause. The landlord can change the word order to understand:

    the order (that) the work be done at once has come 。Should is omitted in front of be.

    4.Remove the insertion we think and it's easy to understand. I choose what. Bootstrap an object clause.

    what the likely result of an action will be.

    5.The noun form of believe should be belief. And not believing.

    6.on what is the book about. What after on leads to a noun clause as an object.

    When it means to win, if it is a transitive verb, it can only be followed by the object, not him.

    Win picks up someone after it, which means persuading someone. And not to win.

    8.Like the third question, it is a copositional clause, which is used to guide here. You can't use which.

    It's been so hard, I hope it can help you

    If you are satisfied, please select "Satisfactory Answer" Thank you for your support

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    1.This can be seen as a fixed sentence structure, which seeks is originally expressed'Like", indicating that the following content is indeterminate, and that it is followed by a subjunctive mood would never endSo use as if instead of that

    Here it is equivalent to the place that, if you use why it is equivalent to the reason that you are mistaken, the meaning does not make sense.

    When leading the copositional clause, it plays the role of a conjunction, has no practical meaning, and does not act as a sentence component. Here is a copositional clause that explains what the order is about.

    4.Pick B. This sentence reverts to the likely result of an action will be whatIn this way, the answer is clear at a glance.

    5.This is an examination of idioms. C The answer is not used much in English, and it is not authentic.

    Here it is indicated what the book is about, which is equivalent to about

    It is an absolute word in itself, and cannot be modified with the word nearly, like perfect.

    8.This is a copositional clause and must be connected with that 7

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Regarded as an abstract place name, where leads the definite clause, and the place adverbial in the clause.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The answer is aThe antecedent conversation is used as a place adverbial in the definite clause, so the relative adverb where should be used.

    The meaning of this phrase is that when we travel by car or train, we talk a lot, exchanging information and opinions about different things.

Related questions