Samsung nx10 and Canon 50D 500D

1. NX10 has no reflector, no optical viewfinder, not a SLR camera, but a single electric camera (single-lens electronic viewfinder camera) The focusing speed is not as fast as the SLR Imaging is theoretically the same as the SLR in APS-C format

Second, the lens is not divided into professional or unprofessional, only good and bad and use, cheap hundreds, expensive tens of thousands, it is difficult to say.

Three, the three machines 50D is better than 500D is better than NX10 In fact, there is no comparison... 50D is a mid-range SLR, 500D is an entry-level SLR, SLR cameras focus on image quality and control NX10 is a single-camera camera, focusing on lightness

Fourth, 50d is now 18-135 sets of more than 6000 NX10 18-55 sets of 5000 500d 18-55 sets of 4499

5. If the funds are sufficient, 50d is best, and if the budget is tight, 500d NX10 is not recommended

500D+ Canon Genuine Lens 18-135

This is the pullover for the Canon 50D. However, because the imaging quality is very good, the focal length is very practical, you can shoot landscape portraits, and the workmanship is very good, so it has become the first choice of many people. At the same time, because when shooting landscapes, we generally shrink the aperture to increase the depth of field, that is, to make the whole scene clear rather than blurring the effect.

So this head, although it can only reach the aperture at the 18mm focal length, is sufficient, because it is generally used to shoot landscapes, and this head has good imagery. Even a constant-aperture wide-angle lens of several thousand yuan does not seem so necessary at this time. You must know that the savings are thousands of yuan!

It makes sense that many people like him, and his "dog head" is actually very "bullish". It is an affordable, inexpensive wide-angle lens. It is indeed a good head worth buying.

As a mid-range product of Canon, 50D was released in 2008, and compared with the previous 40D, it mainly has millions more pixels and the maximum size has been increased. In addition, the more practical LCD display has been increased to 920,000 pixels, and the effect of retrospective is much better. Although it has been discontinued, there are still stocks on the market for sale, **5800 or so.

It's worth buying in terms of value for money. The body is made of aluminum-magnesium and is strong and durable. The basics are all there, so this machine is very suitable for photography enthusiasts.

The NX10 is a single camera, and there is no comparison with a DSLR camera. I recommend buying a 50d set, because 50d has just been discontinued, **6000 yuan or so (this is the best time). Although the 500D is cheaper, it is entry-level after all, and there is still a gap in performance.

However, the 500D is not useless, and its photographic capabilities are relatively perfect. If you have a little bit of photography experience, don't buy a one-for-one camera. In short, this aspect of the problem is still up to you to study slowly, and my suggestions are for reference only.

Glamorous or not Won't you adjust the in-camera settings to Glamorous Won't you add saturation in the later stage, Nikon D700 shoots things gray Are you ** correct Don't tell me you use automatic Nikon D7000 You shoot white yellowing Do you use automatic WB Do you know what the color temperature of fluorescent lights is Do you know that the ambient color temperature is lower than the color temperature in the camera Will the film be warmer Whether it is Nikon Canon You can set any parameter accurately You first learned the setting and figure out the principle DSLR cameras can accurately adjust any of the parameters You say that you're not getting a good shot, it's not the camera, it's that you can't use it.

There is not much difference between the RAW film Nikon Canon, and the style of the jpg format varies from one company to another, which is caused by the different algorithms in the machine.

If you will be in the later stage, adjust the curve and solve it. It's not a bad thing to go straight out of the ash, generally speaking, the gray has a lot of room in the later stage.

D7000 straight out is gray, appropriately improve the comparison, I am also this machine with 17-55, I feel quite satisfied. Look at what you mentionedD800,This machine is still good,I've watched a lot of friendsD800+35 original films,It's very exciting,WhatsMiner shelf machine claims are all smeared。 I shouldn't be marching to full width in the near future, the era of portable full width has been opened, and so on for the RX1 follow-up model, travel equipment is no longer a burden.

Canon is indeed more colorful than Nikon, but after all, D7000 is not high-end, although I myself use C, but I have also borrowed D700 such a full-frame machine as N, with the bull head of N, the effect is also very satisfactory.

The style is different, you can enter which door you like in the style, anyway, there is less pressure to change the door lens group now.

Samsung's imaging quality is not as good as Canon, Canon's biggest advantage is color, the colors are gorgeous, and the imaging is stable, among my friends, few people choose Samsung's DSLR, Canon is more professional! I use Canon 450D, if you have an extra budget, it is recommended to choose Canon 500D, or 550D, cost-effective!

I don't regret choosing Canon, Samsung's machines are too bad.

The 1000D is the lowest-end machine that Canon released a few years ago, and when it was launched, it was questioned that the configuration was too low and the workmanship was too poor. Since then, Canon has not released a follow-up model for the 1000D, which can be considered a positioning failure to some extent. And the Samsung NX10 is a relatively new single-camera camera, although it is not very optimistic about Samsung's machine, but in any case, in terms of function, Samsung should be stronger than 1000D.

If you don't plan to spend a lot of money to upgrade the lens, the image quality of the Samsung NX10 is better than that of the 1000D.

But compared to DSLRs, the Samsung NX10 has always had two well-known flaws: focusing speed and handling. These two shortcomings cannot be changed by the interchangeable lens DC, and can only be made up for as much as possible (except for Sony's A33 A55, which uses semi-lens technology and the body and shutter of the SLR).

Samsung NX10The focusing speed is okay, but because the control is generally easy to miss some shooting opportunities, if the control is not so harsh, on the whole, it is better than the Samsung NX10 than 1000D.

I personally believe in first-line products. Choose Canon's.

Compared with the two, the Samsung NX10 is better.

Samsung NX10,I also use Samsung's machine,My friends around me use NX10,The picture quality is very good,And the Samsung machine is also more resistant。

It is not recommended for the landlord to use the mirror, the mirrorless is a new product at present, the market is not very mature, and the power consumption is relatively large, and the accessories resources are also very lacking, although it is very small, but it is not very convenient to travel. In comparison, it is still Canon, Nikon's SLR is better, after all, the accessories resources of the SLR are much richer, it is easier to upgrade, the power consumption is relatively small, and the cost performance is very high

For DSLR cameras, everyone generally chooses Canon or Nikon, and few people use Samsung. I don't know what your tolerance is, the mid-range SLR Canon has 50D, 40D, the entry-level has 550D, 500D, Nikon Mid-range has D90, D80, I personally think Canon's SLR is better, Canon's color is better, whether it is a person or a landscape, the effect is very good, and the lens is more than Nikon. Nikon's shooting scenery is better, and in everyone's words, it is more "sharp".

If you just use the Canon 50D yourself, it is enough, and if it is cheaper, you can buy a 550D. Canon's cheapest DSLR is 1000D. The most basic entry-level DSLR camera.

The first time I saw someone who wanted to buy a Samsung SLR...

According to the landlord's intentions, I recommend the Pentax KX series as an entry-level camera, without hesitation, it is definitely the most cost-effective camera, but there are some problems with the subsequent upgrade, and the lens is not much on the above models.

If you are ready to upgrade in the future, we recommend the Canon 550D or Nikon D90 D5000

Samsung NX10 performance is average, **cheap, suitable for playing blindly.

The market ** is around 4000 lenses that can be replaced.

Samsung's camera is not very good, I advise you to go and buy a Sony H20Although it is not a DSLR camera, it is very cost-effective. Better than if you buy a Samsung SLR.

Samsung does not have its own DSLR. It's important to remember this.

Samsung's SLR is all made by Pentax, and it is just a Samsung brand. Samsung doesn't make SLR lenses themselves.

If you have to recommend it, I suggest you go directly to Pentax.

Only Canon and Nikon can meet your needs, no matter how you buy a Sony and Pentax, you will regret buying a Samsung.

There are only a few of Samsung's SLR cameras, so I don't need to recommend them.

There is no value for money at all.

Why is it better to have a Samsung one? Cameras aren't Samsung's strong suit. The card machine can still be used improvised, and it is not worth it to buy Samsung for SLR.

Within 10,000 yuan, you can consider the lens of Canon 550D and 15-85, or the lens of D5100 and 16-85. A good lens is more important than the body.

As for the entry SLR after a few days of playing, it will be boring, I don't know where to start.

Nowadays, the introductory SLR is the opposite of the mid-range of the APS-C format, and the components that affect the final image quality, such as the sensor and processor, are the same, and there is no difference in image quality. There will not be a big gap in handling, if the handling of the entry-level SLR is 80 points, the mid-range SLR has a few more shortcut buttons at most 85 points.

As a newbie, how much does it affect you if the shutter lag in the mid-range SLR is a few tenths of a second lower than that of an entry-level SLR, and the focus speed is a few tenths of a second faster?

Reviews should only be used as a guideline. This kind of evaluation basically just scores several parameters of the camera separately and adds them up in different proportions.

For example, some professional-grade cameras don't have a great sense of height. However, commercial photography is mostly used for studio shooting, and there is no requirement for high sensitivity itself. Photojournalism, on the other hand, has a strong reliance on high sensibility.

Which agency stipulates that high sensitivity must be weighted by 30%, rather than 10% or 50% as the criterion for judging the quality of a camera?

The same goes for latitude (which in DSLR should be called dynamic range). Too much latitude can lead to poor color gradation, while too low latitude can result in loss of detail in highlights and shadows when shooting high-contrast shots**. Studio shots typically control the overall light ratio of the frame to no more than 3 stops, while outdoor shots may sometimes want to have a dynamic range of 9 stops.

So is it better to have high or low dynamic range? Different usage environments have different answers, no.

One or two "authoritative bodies" have the final say.

The same goes for pixels. If you only wash 5 inches**, how heavy are the pixels? It doesn't matter at all.

But you're going to wash 30 inches**? That pixel is very important. Should pixels be one of the criteria for evaluation?

Therefore, different institutions have different evaluation criteria, and sometimes the difference is quite large. The evaluation of any organization can only be used as a reference, not as a standard.

This review is basically credible and is made by a professional evaluation agency.

The low-end ones rank higher than the mid-range ones - this is because the image quality is evaluated, not **.

It is recommended that you buy a Nikon D7000 or Pentax K5

The Nikon D7000 set is very suitable for you, and the set ** is less than 10,000.

If you include the medium format digital photo socks wide blue machine, it must be the medium format picture quality is the best. Ha Sue, Phase One and so on.

If it's a full-body camera, the best one is the Nikon D3 series.

The best image quality among the half-frame cameras is the Pentax K5.