The establishment of integrity is more about social factors, and I need to be square

I can't grasp this debate, you should also talk about the opponent's debate to make a targeted analysis, if the opponent is honest and the establishment is more of a family factor, it is a contrast between society and family. If the opposite is that the establishment of integrity is more of a personal factor, it is the contrast between the external environment and the internal quality. You'd better fill in the debate before you can speak.

Integrity is both a personal and a social issue.

From a personal perspective, integrity refers to a person's honest and trustworthy character and moral code of conduct, which is an important embodiment of personal quality and moral level. A person's integrity is not only related to their own image and reputation, but also directly affects the development of personal social, professional, and life aspects. Therefore, integrity is a person's personal issue, which needs to be consciously observed and maintained by the individual.

From the perspective of society, integrity is the cornerstone of the stability and development of the Society, and an important embodiment of social public order and morality. The level of creditworthiness in society is directly related to the harmony, stability and prosperity of society. If the society lacks integrity, it will lead to problems such as trust crisis, moral decay, and social chaos, which will seriously affect the normal operation and development of society.

Therefore, integrity is also a social issue that requires the joint efforts of society to maintain and promote.

To sum up, integrity is not only a personal problem of an individual, but also a social problem of the whole society. The maintenance of integrity requires individuals to consciously abide by it, and it also requires the joint efforts of society to promote and maintain. Only by working together can we build an honest, harmonious and stable society.

Integrity is not only an issue of personal morality, but also an important issue of social governance. Honesty refers to being reasonable, trustworthy, and disciplined, which is the basic quality and behavior of people in life, work and study. Integrity is closely related to personal behavior, and a person's integrity shows personal moral character and self-esteem, self-discipline and other qualities.

Social governance involves political, economic, cultural and other issues, and is the task of all aspects of society to build integrity, rule of law and a beautiful ecology. The existence of integrity is one of the important foundations for the fair, stable and healthy development of society, and the responsibility for establishing and maintaining integrity lies not only with the individual, but also with the society. Therefore, integrity is both a personal and a social issue.

In personal matters, if even individuals cannot be honest, then how can the whole society be honest.

Lack of integrity

The first is a personal question

question, and then rise to social question.

zhi question; The conditions for the rise of DAO as a social problem can be tolerated within the simplicity of the situation, reaching a certain amount, a certain impact effect, and attracting the attention of special groups.

In other words, the problem of lack of integrity is composed of a large number of personal problems, which have a significant impact on society, and become a social problem because they are valued by interest groups or key people.

Both sides should acknowledge that "the lack of integrity is first and foremost a personal problem", with the positive side continuing to prove that it is only a personal problem, while the opposing side argues that it has escalated to a social problem. The lack of integrity you have explained is not enough to become a social problem. If the other party does not even agree with the premise that "the lack of integrity is first and foremost a personal problem", and grasps the fight, it should be possible to defeat the other party at this point.

Social issues, first of all, integrity is a part of morality, and then morality is acquired, which can be demonstrated by the example of the wolf child, or the cultural differences between various civilizations in the world. This part is the relationship between integrity and morality, and the origin of morality.

Then, it's about connecting morality and society. To quote Durkheim's Treatise on Suicide, morality and religion are the embodiment of the collective consciousness of society. It can also be argued by the definition of morality in sociology, morality is expressed by thoughts and behaviors, and there are certain standards of social customs and habits.

Since in the first part we have already argued that morality is acquired, then the responsibility for the environment without learning lies with society. The other party may fight back with how the society will be honest if the individual is not honest. But this is not a chicken-and-egg issue, because integrity occurs between multiple people, which means that a person has no way to reflect integrity, and there must be two subjects to make an agreement.

That is to say, the basis of integrity is the existence of the group, and the group is the foundation of society. It is concluded that the concept of integrity and compliance cannot exist without a society, and that the individual is only a necessary condition for integrity, but not a sufficient condition.

Individuals cannot change the environment, but can only adapt to the environment, and an honest social environment can create and cultivate honest people.

The so-called red near Zhu and black near ink, society is like a big dye vat, after an individual devotes himself to society, the color he presents is given by society. If an honest person has been infected with a dishonest environment, his own integrity will be wiped out little by little.

As we all know, the newborn baby is like a blank piece of paper, its parents will give him the initial understanding of the world, and the same is true of people, what the society tells him is integrity, then he will also learn to be honest, and the society will give him dishonesty, then he will learn dishonesty.

As far as society is concerned, the formation, change and absence of moral norms of social members have deep social roots, and this social root is not given by individuals, but generated by the whole environment.

At present, the issue of creditworthiness has become a social phenomenon and a common problem in society. Many people think that integrity is a social issue, but they don't care about it. It is precisely this trend of thought that has seriously affected the speed of development of creditworthiness.

Integrity is determined by social factors.

Distinguished Chairman, Judges, Opponents, Audience:

Good evening everybody, optional).