At the age of 23, who has better scoring stats compared to Booker or Wade?

At the age of 23, Booker and Wade are of course better in scoring data. The 23-year-old Booker has been in the league for five seasons, and Wade is 21 years old when he enters the league. Wade, who has played for 2 seasons, scored a total of 2,845 points, averaging points per game, shooting percentage, and the highest score in a single game is 48 points.

Booker has scored a total of 7,038 points in his five-year career, averaging points per game, shooting percentage, and performing very well, so Booker's stats are better.

Statistically, Booker is stronger. As the leader of the team, Wade brought the team to the Eastern Conference Finals at the age of 23, and Wade's ability to lead the team is even more prominent.

Booker's scoring stats are better, Booker can average points per game, and Wade can average points per game.

The comparison of data is meaningless, neither of them is the same era, the defensive intensity of the playing style of the era is not the same level, Wade was considered to be the NBA when the defensive intensity was high, and now it is the body hair whistle.

Compared with scoring ability, Wade's ability to attack the rim with the ball is at a historical level, and it is close to the talent of a quarterback. Second only to the breakthrough speed of AI, the comprehensive ability is slightly weaker than Kobe, Maddy, Durant, Booker is only generally strong except for projection, but it is not unsolvable. In this way, Kobe Bryant can score 60 points when he retires, or is he old and returning from a serious injury, do you think Booker's 70 points is meaningful?

Judging from the data, the same 23-year-old Wade beat Booker of the same age in scoring and assists, and the 23-year-old Wade won his first championship ring shortly after he entered the league, and Booker still has to work hard.

The gap is not big. The 23-year-old Booker averaged points per game, and the 23-year-old Wade averaged points per game.

Judging from the regular season, Booker has scored 7,038 points and averaged points per game, while Wade only scored 2,845 points and averaged points per game, and Booker's data is significantly better than Wade in the same period.

From the perspective of the playoffs, Booker scored 02 points because he did not lead the team to the playoffs, and Wade scored 618 points in the playoffs, indicating that Wade has a better team and stronger ability to lead the team.

Curry and Wade, two types of guards with very different styles. Curry is agile and flowy, he doesn't have explosive athleticism, but he has three-point accuracy and top-notch passing. Wade is a brutalist player, with top-notch physicality and unsolvable breakaways.

Throughout their careers, both have achieved high achievements, both of them have led the team to win 3 championships, and both have won 1 scoring trophy, and they are efficient and all-round scorers. When he was also 32 years old, how did the scoring data of the two compare? The result is not what I imagined.

Comparison of regular season stats.

Before you know it, Curry is already a 32-year-old player. He's made a name for himself but he's no longer young, and as the No. 7 pick in '09, Curry has been in the league for 11 seasons. He has changed the landscape of the league with his powerful strength, and his offensive performance has been impressive.

So far in his career, Curry has played 699 games, and he has averaged points per game, and his shooting percentage has increased, with a career total of 16,419 points, and the highest point in a single game is 54 points. In terms of efficiency and scoring performance, Curry is a top point guard.

Wade is the No. 5 pick of the 03 Platinum generation, and he has been the core of the Heat team since he entered the league. At the age of 32, Wade was already hugely successful, playing 719 games, slightly more than Curry. He averaged points per game, shooting from the field, with a high of 55 points per game and a career total of 17,481 points.

In terms of regular season performance, Wade scored better than Curry.

Playoff comparisons.

2013 was a watershed year in Curry's career, as he had never played in the playoffs before that, but after that, the Warriors quickly found success. In the past five seasons, the Warriors have reached the Finals and won three O'Brien Cups. Curry has played in 112 playoff games so far, and he is averaging points per game, shooting 45% from the field, scoring a high of 47 points in a single game, and scoring a total of 2,968 points, which is top in all aspects.

Looking at Wade again, at the age of 32, Wade was teammates with James and Bosh, and he had already achieved brilliant achievements at that time. Wade has even more experience in the playoffs, playing 152 playoff games at the age of 32. He scored a total of 3,481 points, averaging points per game, shooting percentage, and the highest point in a single game was 46 points, which is also the data of a super quarterback.

On the whole, the 32-year-old Curry and the 32-year-old Wade have the same level of scoring ability, Wade won by a small margin in the regular season, but Curry beat Wade by an average of points per game in the playoffs. In the impression of many fans, Wade is a super quarterback with the best scoring ability, and Curry is not so puzzled in the playoffs. However, a closer comparison will show that Curry is not inferior to Wade at all.

Wade's scoring stats are even better, with the 32-year-old Wade averaging points per game and Curry only scoring points.

Curry's scoring stats are better. At the age of 32, Curry can still average some of the league's leading scoring figures per game.

Curry, with a career total of 16,419 points and a single-game high of 54 points, is the top point guard in terms of efficiency and scoring.