Garnett and Webb have played each other 38 times, who is the better performer?

There are many excellent power forwards in the 21st century, and the current Brother Alphabet is an MVP-level supergiant. Before him, Duncan, Nowitzki, Garnett, Webb and other big forwards were also strong. Duncan is both offensive and defensive, Nowitzki is offensive and unsolvable, and Garnett and Webb are well-rounded representatives.

Wolves and Webb are the stars of an era, and they are both very well-rounded power forwards. Can Garnett, who was in his prime, beat Webb? Fighting 38 times in his career, the stats are like this.

Webb was the No. 1 pick in '93 and Garnett was the No. 5 pick in '95, and both were talented big men. Garnett's most puzzling period was with the Timberwolves, and Webb's peak was with the Kings. is also the leader of the Western powerhouse, Webb and Garnett have also played against each other many times in their careers.

It is worth mentioning that Webb has also beaten Garnett to be selected for the best team, and his strength is very strong.

Both have played in the NBA for more than 15 years, so they are old rivals in the regular season. They have met a total of 31 times, and Webb still has the upper hand, with a 16-15 record. In terms of individual performance, Webb averaged shots per game, and could cut down points, rebounds, assists, and blocks, and his shooting percentage.

Garnett also played well, averaging shots per game, and could get all-round statistics such as points, rebounds, assists, and blocks, and shoot as high as high. Garnett's performance is undoubtedly better, but the whole is in the same gear.

Webb and Garnett have only met once in the playoffs, in the 2004 Western Conference semifinals. Garnett was at the peak of his career at the time, and he was the league's MVP+ rebounding champion. Under his leadership, the Timberwolves finished with a 58-24 record in the first place in the West.

The Kings weren't weak, they were fourth in the West at the time, and they also finished the regular season with a 55-27 record.

At that time, the series between the Timberwolves and the Kings was very anxious, from 1-1 to 2-2, the Timberwolves won the Tianwang Mountain with difficulty, and the Kings dragged the game into a tiebreaker. On the stage of the tie-break, the Timberwolves finally won by 3 points. Garnett was the best performer in that series, averaging rebounds and assists plus blocks per game, shooting 44 percent from the field.

Webber also had a good individual performance, with good numbers for points, rebounds and assists, as well as a shooting percentage. Judging from the 38 encounters in his career, Garnett's performance is undoubtedly better, but he is as strong as the wolf king and cannot easily beat Webb.

Garnett was even better, and Garnett suppressed Webber in both record and stats.

Garnett and Webb have played each other 38 times, and it is Webber who has played better, as most of the two have played against Garnett when he was a rookie. So Garnett's performance has always been bad.

In the regular season, they met 31 times, and Webb averaged shots per game, and he could cut down the explosive statistics of points, rebounds, assists, and blocks, and shoot percentage. Garnett averaged shots per game, and could get all-round statistics such as points, rebounds, assists, and blocks, and his shooting percentage was high. Garnett's performance is undoubtedly better, but the whole is in the same gear.

In seven playoff games, Garnett averaged rebounds, assists and blocks per game, and he shot 44 percent from the field. Webb had good stats in points, rebounds and assists, as well as shooting percentage.

Can blow up Webb. At his peak, Garnett was a completely beast-level existence, he was almost omnipotent, and could completely suppress Webb on both offensive and defensive ends.

It's hard to say, Weber's peak was also unbeatable, not a person of the same era, there are all kinds of factors, there is no way to make comparisons. From the perspective of their data alone, this will definitely not be an explosion, but it will not be at a disadvantage.

can't beat Webb, the two can be said to be between the two, the data and record are about the same.

Garnett at his peak is better than Webb, Garnett is too comprehensive, can score, grab boards, assist, steal, block, and the peak Garnett is a terrifying insider.

Is this a problem, didn't 04 really blow up?

Webb is the all-time leader in offense and passing, but unfortunately he played defensive in the playoffs.

Garnett's defensive rebounding has always been at the top level in the league, and he has excellent anticipation and control of rebounding, and has become the NBA rebounding leader for four consecutive years. Because of Garnett's flexibility and anticipation, he has always maintained a leading steal among players in his position, contributing a steal per game. And because of his mobility, he often needs to defend from the outside or even directly at the opponent's scoring guard or small forward.

Objectively speaking (when the two were at their peak), Garnett's physical condition was better. Basketball IQ, Webber is slightly better, offensive Webber is slightly better (both on the offensive initiator end and on the offensive finishing end) and his basketball skills are among the best in the league. Duncan said that Webb is the most terrifying opponent he has ever seen, and defensively, Garnett is better, after all, Webb has never been in the best defensive team, and Garnett is not only a question of whether he can make the best team, but also rebounds, although Webb has also had rebounds, but it is still worse than Garnett.

At the peak of kg, the basket was close to 7 percent of the finishing efficiency, 45%+ shots near the frame, and mid-range shots and large two-point shots were about 45% hits.