What do you think about the idea that education can only be better if it is abolished outside of sch

I don't agree, I think that off-campus institutions are a supplement to the shortcomings of on-campus education, and it is not that off-campus institutions affect education itself, but we should reflect on what is the problem of our education?

Disagree. Out-of-school institutions can allow children who want to learn to learn a little more, and there is a reason for its existence.

The abolition of off-campus institutions and the improvement of education is not "only." Just. At present, various training institutions outside the school are emerging in an endless stream, and the level of ability has yet to be confirmed, and while the standard of living is improving, parents are increasingly investing in education.

Parents of students with excellent academic performance hope to make their children more excellent through the way of making up classes and improving the excellence of off-campus institutions, and parents of students with poor academic performance are eager to let their children make up for their shortcomings<>

Postgraduate entrance examinations, further studies, and civil service examinations. Various tutoring institutions have appeared in the market, and the popularity of the Internet has made online education a very popular tutoring method. Let's make a hypothesis, if the out-of-school institutions are canceled, there is no doubt that the only way for students to learn is school, under the same education, excellent is excellent, poor students are poor students, good or bad teaching can only be like this, the overall competition will be much smaller, and the pressure on students will be relatively smaller, but in the long run, students who make up classes will have more time to study and acquire more knowledge than students who do not have tutorial classes.

Fewer out-of-school institutions, less competitors, and fewer competitors in schooling, don't necessarily get better. <>

The abolition of off-campus institutions has indeed made education more pure, and everyone receives the same compulsory education, but the demand for knowledge and talents in today's society is much greater than before. <>

Education should not forget the original intention of extracurricular institutions and schools are branches of education, the purpose of which is to cultivate talents, purify the operation mode of extracurricular tutoring institutions, and at the same time increase the talent investment of school education teachers, so that school education and extracurricular institutions complement each other, and the two promote each other, forming a benign interaction between the two, rather than school teachers pushing their own responsibilities to parents and extracurricular institutions. I believe that every parent also wants their children to become excellent, and school education bears its own main responsibility, supplemented by out-of-school tutoring institutions, to coordinate and promote the development of education.

Not necessarily, the emergence of off-campus institutions is not because the on-campus education does not meet the requirements of parents, so it has led to the emergence of off-campus institutions.

The measures taken this time are actually to use the coercive force of rectification to brake, turn the entire education back on track, and pave the way for improving the supply of public education and gain time.

As we all know, the marketization of education in China is very serious, looking at the whole world, for example, the United States has only 100 billion yuan in the education market, Japan and South Korea only have a market of about 60 billion yuan, while China has a market as high as one trillion yuan, which is a gap of nearly ten times.

There are countless educational institutions in China, such as New Oriental, Xueersi, Ape Counseling, etc., especially Ape Tutoring Education Company, whose valuation once reached 15.5 billion US dollars. In the education industry under the high valuation, capital is pouring in, and the products of education are naturally rising.

It is customary to pay thousands of make-up classes at every turn, and Lao Jia still remembers that many years ago, he gave a relative's child a high school tutorial class, a total of seven days, and the cost was about 1600, which was the kind of large class of fifty or sixty people, with an average of more than 200 a day, and it was only a subject. Now that the education industry is pouring into the capital, the tide is rising, and it is commonplace for offline one-on-one tutoring in high schools, four or five hundred yuan an hour.

If all the out-of-school training institutions disappear, I think it will be a relief for both students and parents.

In fact, extracurricular training institutions also have the need for its existence, for example, the current dual-income families, in the face of primary school students during the summer vacation, you can let your children go to childcare, so that the children have a place to go temporarily, and parents are more assured, if not, like dual-income families in the summer vacation, there will be no way to go to work, there must be someone to take care of the children.

It is impossible for all off-campus training institutions to disappear, and if you think that they may disappear completely, it is not a materialistic point of view, at least.

It is inevitable that the number of off-campus training institutions will decrease in restrictions, but after a period of time, there is still the possibility of an increase, because there is a demand in society, and there will be existence.

It should be that students have more time to do what they like, and they don't have to go to off-campus training institutions in addition to attending classes in school, and teachers will also concentrate on teaching in schools, and will not think about going outside to make extra money, but for those who work in training institutions, their income will be reduced, so they can only think of other ways.

For example, if all training institutions disappear, it will reduce a lot of burden on students, and it will also reduce a lot of financial pressure on parents. In this way, the student's learning will be easier, which will be of great benefit to the student's growth.

The disappearance of off-campus training institutions has reduced the pressure on parents economically, and the students have also been relaxed, and the tense summer vacation can allow students to have a good rest, reduce the pressure on children, and will not have any impact on the whole society, students with good grades can also be admitted to university, only students with poor grades can not be admitted to university, but now there are technical schools to train, and poor students can go to technical schools to study, and they can also find suitable jobs.

If they all disappear, then they will have a fair start for the students. Because of the existence of off-campus training institutions, those who have money can give their children more tutoring and training, which can be said to give them a higher starting point. But after all of them are gone, it is more dependent on the students' own self-control and self-learning ability.

Off-campus training institutions can only be said to be a certain product of time in the output value, and it is very normal for training institutions to be outside the school without off-campus. And it is also a warning to the teachers in the school, do not have this kind of situation of not teaching in class, this is very bad, equality in education is everyone's right.

The disappearance of off-campus training institutions will certainly have an impact on society. Teachers will return to real education, instead of self-study in class and make up for it after class. It wastes a lot of educational resources, and at the same time reduces the burden on parents and students.

If all the off-campus training institutions disappear, then everyone will enjoy the on-campus training resources equally, and everyone's educational background will be equal.

If all off-campus training institutions disappear, it will not have any impact on students and parents in the long run......Back then, off-campus training institutions didn't exist in the first place. At that time, it didn't say that it had any impact. ......Therefore, if all off-campus training institutions disappear in the future, it will not have any impact on students' parents.

aqui te amo。

Hello, if all the off-campus training institutions disappear, students' extracurricular time may become easier, parents can no longer just be hands-off, they may need to pay more attention to students' learning, the school's responsibility will be greater, and it will also bring temporary unemployment to some people. Thank you.

If a training provider closes, at least 70% of parents will applaud! Clearly, the interests of the training provider and the majority of parents are opposed. With the popularity of the term "involution" last year, training institutions have actually become the culprits of educational involution.

What impact will it have on students, parents, and society as a whole if all out-of-school training institutions were to disappear?

I think that if all the off-campus training institutions disappear, it may have a little impact on students, parents and the whole society for the time being, but it will not be very large, because online classes can be held.

If there are no such training institutions, then the school and teachers will definitely be more responsible for the school's admission rate than now, and the off-campus training cannot be counted on, and the students may learn more seriously!

If all the off-campus training institutions disappear, then parents and students will pay more attention to school and family education, which will be relatively fairer and more reasonable in educational resources.

If all training institutions disappear, it will have an impact on students, parents, and society as a whole, and parents who can afford to tutor their children will have the advantage, and parents who cannot help their children will be hurt by the goal of helping their children obtain educational resources, and they will have fewer choices.

The main purpose is to change the current situation that the cost of education is too high and ordinary families cannot afford to raise children.

1. Reduce the burden on parents and increase the fertility rate.

China's society has entered the aging population, the country has liberalized the three-child policy, but now the young people who are suitable for childbearing do not want to give birth, the reason is that they can't afford to raise, "it's too expensive to have a child", suppress off-campus training institutions, and implement the school "5 + 2" policy is to solve the economic investment of parents raising children.

2. Achieve educational equity.

The gap between the rich and the poor in the education of urban and rural children, the educational resources enjoyed by urban and rural children are not fair, and the children of economically powerful families have the ability to participate in various extracurricular training institutions, so that they enjoy educational resources much higher than that of children from poor families.

3. Prevent the loss of high-quality public education resources.

Off-campus discipline training uses high wages and high treatment, especially off-campus training under the Internet mode, teachers do not have to sit in class, and there is no pressure on teaching performance, to tap excellent teachers in public schools, and in the long run, public high-quality educational resources have been lost, so cracking down on off-campus discipline training has become inevitable for the rectification of the education industry.

The fundamental reason for suppressing off-campus training institutions is that China's education mechanism is problematic, the involution of education is very serious, and the cultivation of single talents is a kind of abnormal development that needs to be adjusted urgently.

1. Let education return to the road of teaching and educating people.

Off-campus education and training institutions under the coercion of capital aim to make a profit and go public, rather than to teach and educate people. Therefore, China has rectified the off-campus training industry that is "coerced by capital". If education is "coerced", the future of the country will be in the **ah.

2. Change the phenomenon of college students for all, so that everyone can find a role that suits them

The core of the existence of the education system has always been the selection of talents, and the biggest problem in China is the serious surplus of college students, and the model of industrial mass production of college students is no longer in line with the historical choice of the country at the current stage.

3. Off-campus training institutions have made our education a heavy burden.

It stems from a deeper dissatisfaction with the education industry, where excessive education and training torments young people, and also causes a heavy financial burden on parents and exacerbates social inequality.

The biggest advantage of the rectification of off-campus training institutions is that education is fair, children can enjoy equal educational resources, and there are no longer differentiated educational opportunities, which is a normal and healthy education mechanism.

On the one hand, it is possible to force a reduction in the cost of education.

On the other hand, teaching and auxiliary resources are all excellent people, but their work is mostly of little use to society and can be released.

The fundamental reason for suppressing off-campus training institutions is to reduce the burden on parents, because now many people go to tutoring for their children during the summer vacation, which increases everyone's financial burden and pressure.

First of all, the fundamental reason for suppressing off-campus training institutions is the injection of capital, that is to say, in China, it is not very permissible for capital to have an impact on the state-owned economy, and in addition, it is a make-up class for students outside the classroom by training institutions, and then some teachers do not do a good job of lecturing with students in class, and then move to the off-campus to make up classes, which is a bad impact on students.

Because the college entrance examination is a modern and improved version of the successful imperial examination system, through this talent social status selection system, a bunch of talent materials are screened out by grade. However, the key purpose of the college entrance examination is misunderstood, thinking that the college entrance examination system is for high-end talents.

As the time spent in school has been extended, teachers and schools have to adjust their work content and working hours to ensure that the rights and interests of teachers and students are not affected, and the burden on schools has become heavier.

1. The responsibility of the school is greater.

The Ministry of Education issued a notice to implement the "5+2" after-school tutoring model after the autumn, which will be implemented on September 1, 21. It is that the time spent by students in school has increased, and the official said that students should not leave school earlier than the usual end time of local enterprises, which requires schools to arrange the time after students' normal classes.

2. The working hours of teachers may have to be extended.

During the time when students are in school, the school and teachers are responsible for the safety and personal responsibility of students, and ensure that the students are treated equally for the extended 2 hours. Some experts have suggested that teachers could work flexibly.

3. The burden on parents is reduced.

First of all, the time to pick up children no longer conflicts with the working hours, the cost of after-school tutoring classes is saved, the family education expenditure is reduced, and the quality of life index is increased.

It is important to note that this is not mandatory, but voluntary, and it is reasonable for students to pay a fee if they participate in this after-school service, after all, teachers need to sacrifice their time to tutor students, and appropriate financial compensation should be deserved.