Let s take a look at this sentence, the spear is not contradictory

Literally, it seems to be a contradiction.

But, from a psychological point of view, no contradiction!

When you ask whether "this sentence" is contradictory or not, you are asking "this sentence":

Since I don't believe (don't

believe: It can also be translated as "do not think") There are "ghosts", that is, you think: there are no "ghosts" in the world, since you think that there are no "ghosts" in your heart, then the "object of fear" in your heart does not exist, then your "fear" does not have a de facto "object".

Therefore, it is "contradictory"!

But from a psychological point of view:

Your words, "I'm afraid of ghosts," are actually "I'm afraid......It's just that you don't know what it's "scared" of.

Therefore, you are just "inexplicable" "afraid", and that "inexplicable thing" is just called a "ghost" by you.

In real life, many times, "inexplicable things" are more likely to trigger psychological fear than legendary "ghosts".

One day, Plato asked his teacher what love was, and his teacher told him to go into the wheat field first and pick the largest and most golden ear of wheat in the whole wheat field. You can only pick it once during this period, and you can only walk forward, not turn back. Plato did as his teacher said.

As a result, he walked out of the wheat field empty-handed.

The teacher asked him why he couldn't pick it, and he said, "Because I can only pick it once, and I can't go back, even if I see a big and golden tree, I don't know if there is a better one in front of me, so I don't pick it;

When I walked to the front, I found that it was not as good as what I had seen before, and it turned out that the largest and most golden ears of wheat in the wheat field had long been missed; So, I couldn't pick anything. The teacher said, "This is love." ”

To seek love is to seek one's own happiness.

Contradiction is opposite, this sentence is not correct, it is one-sided.

There is a little contradiction between colleagues, but it does not have to be antagonistic, but if the contradiction intensifies, it must be antagonistic. There are different degrees of this.

When the contradictions are deep, there is a manifestation of opposing positions. If there is a small contradiction, it is not necessarily antagonistic, but it can be a difference in positions and views. Can be adjusted not to love-for-tat. Slowly you can make adjustments, seek common ground while reserving small differences, and work together without affecting mutual cooperation.

Contradiction refers to the unity of opposites of things.

This concept of materialism and idealism has also been seen, but materialism is the contradictory view of materialism, and idealism is the contradictory view of consciousness, both views regard the relationship between matter and consciousness as a derivative relationship, in fact, the relationship between matter and consciousness is not a derivative relationship, but a contradictory relationship between the two sides of a problem.

Most of the conflicts between me and my husband come from work, I am resolute in doing things, I don't like to procrastinate, I don't like to be aimless, I like to be organized and planned, and I like to be in charge of the whole course of events.

And Mr. is born with a passive character, and he relies on external forces to push things forward, such as when the customer urges the business to be tight, and the customer does not urge, he does not urge. Burn or do things unorganized, no plan. At first, I saw him so slow and methodical, and I really wanted to get started on my own.

After several times of communication, I found that he had not changed, so I gave up. Away from his work, he only focused on doing what he liked, regularly reporting to him on his family's income, and sounding the alarm for him.

Fortunately, he can still live now, and his income can still maintain his current living situation, so I am happy to be idle.

But occasionally there will be a lot of fire in my heart, usually when there is a problem in his work that needs to be solved, such a fire burns in my heart, and the usual tolerance for him is burned away, but I still have to endure it, think about what he needs most at this time, how to solve the problem more effectively.

There will always be contradictions between people, because it is impossible to find someone exactly like you, and you still have to accept the difference of other people's skin, maybe in his opinion, my nerves are too tight and late.

What will happen if the contradiction is not resolved in time, there are only two results, the first is the deepening of the contradiction, and the second is natural healing.

Like the first situation is the most common, often the cause and impact of this situation are relatively large, the contradiction we need to solve, solve the problem is to minimize the impact of the contradiction, the damage is lost, is a kind of respect and apology for everyone involved.

If you ignore the contradictions in the development of things by default, the rift between them will be further exacerbated, and the contradictions will accumulate deeper and deeper, causing an insurmountable gap, and in the end, all the people or things involved will fail, and even friends will break up.

Like the second case, it is more special but also more common. The impact of this contradiction or the trust of people who contradict each other is still relatively high.

Time is the best medicine, and after a long time, they will be regarded as a life spice for each other, and it will be solved slowly. But a contradiction like this requires everyone to have a good mindset and trust.

The contradiction itself is a problem of mutual existence, spear and shield. Everyone needs to have a degree in their own hearts, how to solve what kind of contradictions, and whether they need to be solved.

Original text: The Chu people have a shield and a spear, and the reputation says: "It is also praised as its spear and says: "The benefits of my spear are all trapped in things." ”

Translation: There was a man in the state of Chu who sold spears and shields, and praised his shield and said: "My shield is so strong that no ** can pierce it." Then he praised his spear and said, "My spear is sharp, and nothing penetrates." ”

The strength of my shield cannot be trapped.

He also praised his spear and said: "The benefits of my spear are all trapped in things, and these two sentences are adopted.

The Chu people have shields and spears, and they say: "The strength of my shield is that things can't be trapped." He also praised his spear and said:

The benefits of my spear are all trapped in things. Or say, "How is it to attack the shield of the son with the spear of the son?"

His people can also respond. The shield of the husband who cannot fall into it and the spear that does not fall into it stand together in the world.

Among them, "the strength of my shield cannot be trapped" (my shield is extremely strong, and anything sharp cannot penetrate it) and "the strength of my spear is invincible to everything" (my spear is extremely sharp, and anything strong can pierce it).

The Chu people have shields and spears, and they say: "The strength of my shield is that things can't be trapped." "It is also known as its spear and is called Qihu:

The benefits of my spear are all trapped in things. Or say, "How is it to attack the shield of the son with the spear of the son?"

His people can also respond. The shield of the husband who cannot fall into it and the spear that does not fall into it stand together in the world.

Among them, "the strength of my shield, things can not be trapped" (my shield is extremely strong, and anything sharp cannot penetrate it) contradicts Sun Ye's "the strength of my spear, everything is trapped" (my spear is sharp and quiet, and anything strong can pierce it).

Original text: The Chu people have a shield and a spear Song, the reputation of the said: "It is also praised for its spear and said: "The benefit of my spear is all trapped in things." ”

Translation: There was a man in the state of Chu who sold spears and shields, and praised his shield and said: "My shield is so strong that no ** can pierce it." Then he praised his spear and said, "My spear is very sharp, and nothing can penetrate it." ”

The strength of my shield cannot be trapped.

He also praised his spear as a void and said: "The benefits of my spear are all trapped in these two sentences." Thank you.

Translation: There was a man in the state of Chu who sold spears and shields, and praised his shield and said: "My shield is so strong that no ** can pierce it." He praised his spear and said, "My spear is sharp, and there is nothing that cannot penetrate it." ”

The strength of my shield cannot be trapped.

He also praised his spear and said: "The benefits of my spear, Yu Wuchang will not fall into these two sentences."

There is no contradiction, you just have to look inside yourself to see why you are afraid of ghosts.

For example, if you are walking alone in a very dark alley, and there is no one around, then you will be afraid and will associate with ghosts, if you think carefully about the ghost, you will find that it may be the image of a ghost in a movie, or a ghost scene in a horror story, etc., these associations themselves are accompanied by the memory of horror at that time.

So it doesn't matter if you're afraid of ghosts or not, but when you're afraid of ghosts, your surroundings remind you of some previous horror experience. Ghosts are already in your mind.

Now we can try to get rid of that fear, you can try to think about what I'm afraid of whenever you're afraid. When you think that it turned out to be a ghost movie I watched last time, the fear subsides. (And if you repeatedly tell yourself that ghosts don't exist, that there are no ghosts in the world, it won't work at all, and you will continue to be afraid).

Literally, it seems to be a contradiction.

But, from a psychological point of view, no contradiction!

When you ask whether "this sentence" is contradictory or not, you are asking "this sentence":

Since I don't believe (don't believe: It can also be translated as "do not think") that there are "ghosts", that is, you think: there are no "ghosts" in the world, since you think that there are no "ghosts" in your heart, then the "object of fear" in your heart does not exist, then your "fear" has no de facto "object".

Therefore, it is "contradictory"!

But from a psychological point of view:

Your words, "I'm afraid of ghosts," are actually "I'm afraid......It's just that you don't know what it's "scared" of.

Therefore, you are just "inexplicable" "afraid", and that "inexplicable thing" is just called a "ghost" by you.

In real life, many times, "inexplicable things" are more likely to trigger psychological fear than legendary "ghosts".

Contradictory, if you don't believe in ghosts, how can you be afraid? Only after experiencing it can you know whether you are afraid or not.

I don't think it's a contradiction, although everyone knows that there are no ghosts, but there are still many people who are afraid of ghosts.

"People estimate that the total number of extragalactic galaxies is more than 100 billion" and "scientists estimate that there are at least 2 trillion galaxies in the universe" are not contradictory, but there is a turning relationship between the two clauses.

The "people" here are clearly non-specialists who distinguish them from "scientists", who "estimate" the data at 1000

More than 100 million, while the "scientists" estimate the data to be "at least 2 trillion", it is completely logical that the two data come from two different groups.

The method of modification is to connect the two clauses with the conjunctive conjunction "but" or "while" to highlight the difference between the two points.

This paragraph mainly discusses and explains the peculiarities of contradictions.

First of all, the world is material, and all matter is in motion, which constitutes the universality of contradictions and the commonality of all things. The specific contradictions of each specific thing are different from each other, and the difference of these contradictions constitutes the essential difference of things. These specific contradictions have a certain degree of commonality and constitute different fields of scientific research.

Therefore, the universality of contradictions tells us the universal laws, and the particularity of the contradictions tells us the specific laws.

These philosophical words are a bit crooked, but they are indeed very rigorous, and the phrase translates to a colloquialism, which is almost (note the word) and means this: the internal cognitive capacity of human beings is infinite, but the external conditions limit our cognitive ability, which forms a contradiction. This contradiction is infinite, cyclical, and unified, and can only be resolved in the process of overcoming each other (the process of negation of negation).