As a reader, the last thing you can do is how an author writes?

I can't accept it when I look at **, that is, the halo of the protagonist written by the author is too shiny, the heroine can play the piano, chess, calligraphy and painting, as big as the way of governing the country, ancient and modern, small to outstanding cooking skills, dexterous and incomparable, folding a paper crane can make people admire the rare in the sky and the earth, every man loves her, there is only a female protagonist in the whole story, and there is not even a maid ring or anything. Let's get a brain.

In order to attract attention, there is no bottom line of nonsense, and in order to cater to hot spots, regardless of the impact of good or bad.

The last thing I can accept is that the author often uses the words "um, ahh

I can't accept that the author writes too happily and laughs all the way.,Proper joy can.,I don't know what to write all the time with a smile.。。

I don't like the author to write a large space to describe the scenery and horses, and the appropriate portrayal is brought in according to the plot to contrast the hearts of the characters. But I hate to go on long speeches.,Say.。。。 What do you want to write about Shenma? Or make up the word count?

Logic control means that I can't stand the kind of plot with logic problems, and when I see that there is a problem with the logic of the plot, I am simply entangled in my heart and can't watch it.

The beginning was well written, and it led me into the game. But the more I watched it, the more I felt that it was nothing to look at, and I saw the ending all of a sudden, so I simply gave up the article.

I hate it most when the author names the characters and makes a lot of cold words that I don't know.,I'm too lazy.,And I like to read things in my heart.,Generally when I encounter words I don't know, for example, there is a person named Li Xu, I read Li X directly in my heart.,And then the whole article looks like a left x right an x.,It feels too weird.。

The last thing I can accept is that the author named the characters like oracles!! I saw the decisive off! Honestly, the depth and talent of the author are not measured by a very cold and rare name. It's simpler, with some meanings, and I think it's easier for people to remember.

I can't accept the author's use of "and ellipsis" in the text. Although I often do this when I speak, I can't write an essay, and I immediately feel good when I see it.

What I can't accept the most is that the author can't write well, forcibly adds drama to himself, and there are a lot of ...... that don't add punctuation marks to language problems

Haven't you heard that "reading more than 10,000 books, writing like a god"? As long as it is reading, it is helpful for writing, "Reader" and "Youth Digest" because they are magazines, the articles are short, the content is rich and colorful, and many articles are novel in concept, and the writing is also very good, middle school students are very nervous about learning, reading this kind of book, it will not constitute a lot of suspense, so it will not affect their studies.

When you read this kind of magazine, you should pay attention to imitating the writing method of the Chinese chapter of the book, and classify the content of the digest, find ways to remember more, when writing the discussion **, most of the content of the digest can be used as factual arguments. Even if you write a narrative, you can also quote it, and the advantage of reading an abstract is that you can read the essence of many books and newspapers without spending a lot of time, which is very good for accumulating writing materials.

But you have to experience it with your heart, and it will be effective if you understand it thoroughly.

Haven't you heard that "reading more than 10,000 books, writing like a god"? As long as it is reading, it is helpful for writing, "Reader" and "Youth Digest" because they are magazines, the articles are short, the content is rich and colorful, and many articles are novel in concept, and the writing is also very good, middle school students are very nervous about learning, reading this kind of book, it will not constitute a lot of suspense, so it will not affect their studies.

When you read this kind of magazine, you should pay attention to imitating the writing method of the Chinese chapter of the book, and classify the content of the abstract, and try to remember more in a blind way. It is to write a narrative, you can also quote, and the advantage of reading a digest is that you can read the essence of a lot of books and newspapers without spending a lot of time, which is very good for accumulating writing materials.

But you have to experience it with your heart, and it will be effective if you understand it thoroughly.

Whether we are readers or authors, when we come into contact with words, our aesthetic taste is often determined by our personality, life experience, and growth environment.

These three points are naturally applied to a person, and their effects are both good and bad, and it is not easy to get rid of them completely. We should sharpen and cultivate our inherent personality, expand our life experience and experience it carefully, and accept and integrate the traditional habits of many parties. These three points of effort are what we often call academic cultivation, and pure taste must be the result of academic cultivation.

Other Statements to Describe the Title:

Chinese painting emphasizes both form and spirit, and the early form is heavy. Han Feizi's paintings of the Warring States period are more similar to the form. Starting from the literati painting of the Song Dynasty, the so-called "original from the heart, want to form the traces, the traces and the heart", that is to say, the pursuit of the painting is the combination of form and heart.

The Spanish painter Pablo Picasso once said, "It took me four years to paint like Raphael, holding a bird, but it took me a lifetime to paint like a child." This means that although his realistic painting skills have reached a certain level, he still needs to learn from the children their childlike innocence. It is clear that although there are differences between Chinese and foreign artistic traditions, there are also commonalities.

Inner Sage and Outer King: An ideal personality in ancient Chinese ethical thought. It means to cultivate the virtues of the holy king internally, and to perform the king's government or external social merit.

Speak out of the "Zhuangzi Tianxia" chapter. Its content varies from school to school. The ideal personality of Confucianism, which is dominated by internal saints and external kings, has had a profound impact on the politics, ethics, philosophy, and culture of Chinese society.

It has become the ideal goal pursued by Chinese scholars and intellectuals in the past dynasties.

This girl quit her job three years ago, and she has insisted on writing her favorite ** for three years, but she has never published it, so she doesn't have any income, she was anxious at first, but then she slowly got used to it and accepted the status quo. She is married and has children, and her family conditions are okay, so she doesn't care much about the fact that her income is 0, and she found me because she felt that it was too long and had no effect, and on the other hand, she also hoped to be able to make some money through **.

My advice to her is to reconsider the purpose of her writing, if it is to make money, then the payment at this stage may need to be adjusted, such as choosing a good platform to contribute, at least keep contributing a few articles per month, get a few thousand manuscript fees to stabilize your heart, relieve the pressure of income, and still write ** at another time, but if you don't care about income at all, then you can continue to insist on writing what you like.

Unlike her, I started writing as a hobby, and later writing became a profession for me, since it is a profession, it requires an income, and the later it gets, the more stability is needed.

Just like work, a lot of content isn't what you like, but you have to accept it. The same goes for writing. If you want to make money, you have to cater to or understand the market, of course, we don't change our hearts in order to cater to it, but we can't be like zero income, completely ignoring the income situation.

So who should I write for needs to be based on reality. What's the point of writing for yourself if your survival is in question?

Under the tide of market economy, today's writers have to take the existence of the market seriously. Originally writing was about spreading culture, but now culture has changed, and it is both a culture and a commodity. So, the writer writes both for himself and for the reader.

Writing for your readers and writing for yourself are not opposites. It's not kitsch to think about the reader. In fact, if you feel that the reader is on the opposite side of you, then either you think too highly of yourself and disdain to communicate with the average reader; Either that, or what you've written is too obscure for the masses to like.

Many people always think that catering to readers is a very philistine behavior, but in fact, this is not called catering to readers, but you can empathize, be able to amplify your own power, and be able to speak for the public, which is a very happy and meaningful thing.

If you don't want to make money writing, just write about your advanced art. Wait 300 years for future generations to discover the artistic achievements of your work. For example, Cao Xueqin's Dream of Red Mansions and Van Gogh's paintings are all admired by later generations.

I feel that writing is both for myself and for the reader, and these two aspects should not be opposites, they are integrated. The inspiration of writing comes from life, from the author's experience, many stories are what he has seen, heard and felt around him, when the author writes these inspirations into words, it is also a spiritual process, and some readers will resonate after reading it, in this sense, the effect of writing for readers can be achieved, and the two are integrated.

Writing is to write for readers, of course, not to cater completely without a bottom line, but to write selectively, with a bottom line, and with a standpoint, and to write truly nutritious, popular, and marketable value-added content!

Writing for your readers or for yourself is not a matter of fish and bear's paws. In fact, you can use a way that the public can understand and appreciate to present your emotions, opinions and ideas in front of the reader in a coherent manner, and use your pen to speak for the reader.

I believe that writing should be written for the reader. First of all, the core of writing is to disseminate ideas, values, and opinions, which requires an audience and someone to receive information, that is to say, writing is also a kind of fan economy. Therefore, the reader's thinking is particularly important.

To put it simply, reader thinking is to write articles based on the reader's perspective, write what readers love to read, want to see, and will read, and say what they want to say for readers, but can't say. Only by writing articles from the perspective of readers can we accumulate fans, and with fans, our writing will be more motivated and meaningful!

I think it's for myself to write.,My own ** is written by myself even if it's bad.,Even if others say about you.,It's also taking your own mind.,I'll change slightly for the reader's taste.,But I want the overall idea of this ** won't change.,If others make unreasonable requests, I will never write.,I think first for myself and then for others.,I don't know what others think.,Anyway, I think it's like this.,If you don't like it, spray.。

It depends, if you want other people's approval, then write for the reader, if you don't care about other people's identity, just for your own interests, etc., just write for yourself.

Use your own thoughts and experience to write stories that readers love to read. Only when readers recognize it can there be a market, sustain a life, and support more creations and opportunities. If there are no readers, no fart, no manuscript fees and the market, and when you drink the northwest wind on an empty stomach, who still has the heart to create?

Actually, that's how life is. Unless you want to do Van Gogh.

For honor, money, hobbies, self-worth, etc., I feel a little funny when it comes to readers, is there really a book written purely for readers? If there were, I wouldn't have seen it.

I think this reader writes for himself, and I think you should have both, because that's how you can write better articles, and if you write, you can also listen to other people's opinions.

I think I should write for myself. Because writing is not about enriching everyone, but about making oneself. To express your feelings at the moment.

I think the writer should write for himself, because what he writes is his own, and he can write down his own experience, his own mood, and what he likes.

Some people just write a book at random in their lives, such as "Gone with the Wind", and they don't plan to publish it, or they are thrown into the fire pit and pulled out after a few years, and then they are made into a movie "Gone with the Wind" by the eyes of the world; Some such as Zhang Ailing, a natural writer, and some masterpieces, most of them have also been made into movies such as "Lust and Caution". It's hard to tell the question, it's up to the author himself. If you are running for a living, most of them must consider market issues to cater to readers, after all, you have to survive; If it's not for survival, maybe it's pure.

Authors are called authors because they are recognized by their readers. So you can write however you want, for whomever you want. The newcomer should write for the readers first, after all, there will be opportunities to write for yourself in the future!

Write for the readers, everyone has a ruler in their hearts to measure themselves, and their own understanding of themselves is incomplete.

I think the author should write for the reader. Because what he writes is read by readers.

I believe that the writer should write for the reader and write for himself.

Personally, for myself.

There is money for oneself, and there is no money for others