Please judge the matter both legally and morally. 20

1. The law is mandatory. But morality is not, for example, garbage should be thrown into the trash can, this is morality, but it is not mandatory, that is, if you don't throw the trash can, you will not be punished much.

The law is different, if you kill someone and break the law, you should be punished by the law.

2. Morality is a ruler that exists in people's hearts, and law is a fair and mandatory provision for the public by the legislature.

Law can be a scope that encompasses morality, but morality is not all law.

There is no copy

There is no eternal morality that is immutable and immutable

Constant Law. In today's society, ruling groups representing different interests still exist, but the class interests they represent are fundamentally different or antagonistic. Different ruling groups have their own class interests and morals that are compatible with their class interests.

Since law is the embodiment of the will, and morality certainly belongs to the category of will, then law certainly reflects the moral outlook of the ruling class. From the perspective of focusing on morality, we can define law as: subjectively, law is the embodiment of the will of the state and the ruling class; In the objective aspect, the content of the law is determined by certain social and material living conditions.

The former embodies the will of the state and the ruling class of the law, and the latter embodies the material constraints of the law. Law is the contradictory unity of these two aspects.

What is not allowed by morality is not necessarily illegal, but what is not allowed by general law is not allowed by morality, because the requirements of law are lower than those of morality, and morality is higher than the requirements of law. So generally speaking, the law is the bottom line.

And when it comes to importance... It is not possible to generalize, but if you insist on saying it, the bottom line is that the law is more important.

But on different occasions, the application is different, as an ordinary person, ordinary self-discipline is to be based on morality, not just to the law as the standard, which is too low for oneself, not conducive to growth.

Moral issues are not necessarily in violation of the law, but it is not only moral issues that are in violation of the law. For example, stealing a lotus flower is only a moral issue and does not violate the law, but if you steal the lotus flowers from the entire pond planted by someone else, it is a violation of the law, and it is not just a moral issue.

Law: In fact, the law is the bottom line of morality.

The two are just a low-level requirement and a high-standard pursuit.

So it's the law that's more important.

Summary. For example, it is morally permissible to respect the elderly, love the young, and help the grandmother cross the street, while the smuggling of drugs, which is prohibited by law, is ......

The behavior of Zen and poor skin promoted by morality must be permitted by law. What is forbidden by the law must be condemned by Qingwan morality. Please use an example to share your thoughts on the above two sentences.

For example, it is morally permissible to respect the elderly, love the young, and help the grandmother cross the street, while the smuggling of drugs, which is prohibited by law, is ......

And there's more. In our country, all behaviors that are prohibited by the law are morally condemned; Whatever is required and encouraged by law is also what morality advocates and praises; There are many legal obligations that are not only legal obligations, but also moral requirements.

It's gone. This shows that law and morality are mutually reinforcing, mutually reinforcing, and inseparable.

So you'll write.

How to write at the beginning.

What is Law? The law is a code of conduct formulated or recognized by the state; is enacted or endorsed by a national legislature; It is a universally binding code of conduct for members of society; It is a code of conduct that is guaranteed to be implemented by the coercive power of the state. That's why we often refer to the law as "the law of the land."

Therefore, the law has always given us a sense of the spine that is far away. In fact, the law is all around us, because law and morality are inseparable, so what is the relationship between law and morality?

Then you write about the ...... that morality promotesLet's take an example to illustrate this sentence.

Ok, thanks <>

The same is true of what is prohibited by the law.

Thank you and have a great day. Good night.

Judgment and analysis questions on ethics and the rule of law, how to judge errors and one-sidedness.

Hello dear, I'm glad to answer for you, in the judgment and analysis questions of the Dao Rent Yuan Yingde and the Rule of Law test questions, the judgment errors and one-sided methods are as follows: 1An inaccurate or incomplete understanding of the facts leads to erroneous or one-sided judgments.

In judgment and analysis questions, it is very important to understand the facts correctly. If the understanding of the facts is inaccurate or incomplete, it is easy to make mistakes or one-sided judgments. Therefore, when taking the test, it is necessary to read the questions carefully to ensure that the understanding of the facts is accurate and comprehensive.

2.Only one aspect of the factor is taken into account when judging, while other factors are ignored. In judgment and analysis questions, it is necessary to consider many factors, rather than only one factor.

If only one factor is taken into account, it is easy to make one-sided judgments. 3.Judgment is influenced by subjective emotion.

In judgment and analysis questions, it is necessary to look at the problem as objectively as possible, rather than being influenced by subjective emotions. If it is influenced by subjective emotions, it is easy to make mistakes in judgment or one-sidedness. 4.

Different positions and perspectives are not taken into account when judging. In the judgment and analysis questions, it is necessary to take into account different positions and perspectives, and look at the problem from multiple perspectives. If we look at the problem from only one angle, it is easy to make one-sided judgments.

In the judgment and analysis of the ethics and rule of law test questions, it is necessary to look at the problem as objectively and comprehensively as possible, take into account various factors and different positions and angles, and avoid being affected by subjective emotions, so as to avoid judgment errors and one-sidedness. <>