How to look at the peasants survival rationality and economic rationality

Farmers' survival rationality and economic rationality are two different ways of thinking, and they play an important role in the decision-making process of farmers.

Survival rationality mainly emphasizes the leading role of basic survival needs and survival risks on farmers' behaviors, as well as the constraints of values and ethics on farmers' behaviors. Under the assumption of economic rationality, farmers will follow the principle of rational economic man that maximizes profits. However, in real life, farmers often need to make a trade-off between survival rationality and economic rationality.

Some scholars believe that the survival rationality of the peasant is a view that is opposed to economic rationality. However, some scholars believe that the rationality of farmers' survival is necessary because the environmental conditions in which farmers live are relatively severe, such as natural risks and market risks. Therefore, farmers need to adopt the principle of rational choice for survival in order to avoid risks and obtain stable and sustainable harvests.

In addition, there is controversy about whether farmers lack economic rationality. In fact, farmers also take economic factors into account in the decision-making process, but their decision-making is often influenced by many factors, such as survival pressure, social culture, morality and ethics, etc. Therefore, the peasants cannot simply be seen as a group lacking in economic rationality.

To sum up, the survival rationality and economic rationality of peasants are a kind of game relationship that is interdependent and mutually influential. In real life, farmers need to make trade-offs between survival rationality and economic rationality to make the most appropriate decisions. At the same time, we need to understand the environmental and social conditions in which farmers live, and respect their right to life and the principle of choice.

Economic rationality is the basis of survival rationality, and in general, farmers have always attached importance to how to make themselves survive, arrange themselves reasonably, and challenge difficulties.

When peasants farm and work, they save money to marry a wife and build a house.

The economic rationality of the peasants and the rationality of survival are two different concepts. Survival rationality refers to the fact that farmers are subject to traditional forces such as ethics, morality and customs in their production activities, and the allocation of labor and resources is not based on the principle of maximum economic benefits, but more consideration is given to the survival and development of families and communities. Economic rationality refers to the fact that farmers engage in agricultural production under specific resource and technical constraints, pursue the maximization of profits, and adjust production according to interests to achieve the optimization of factor allocation.

In traditional agriculture, the economic rationality and survival rationality of the peasants are intertwined. In his book "Transforming Traditional Agriculture", Schultz proposes that farmers in traditional agriculture are like entrepreneurs, engaged in agricultural production under specific resource and technical constraints, pursuing the maximization of profits, and adjusting production according to interests to achieve the optimization of factor allocation. At the same time, what is perceived as irrational behavior on the surface of the peasants is precisely their rationality in the face of external constraints (technology, institutions, culture, beliefs, etc.).

Therefore, the survival rationality and economic rationality of the peasants are both very important factors in agricultural production and management.

To sum up, the survival rationality and economic rationality of the peasants are both very important, and the relationship between the two is also intertwined. In agricultural production and management, farmers need to comprehensively consider these two factors according to the actual situation in order to achieve the best agricultural production and management results.

Survival rationality is the basis for the rational development of peasants, and by adapting to the process of marketization, peasant rationality will realize the leap from survival rationality to development rationality. However, development rationality does not arise naturally in the process of marketization. Marketization may not only promote the leap from survival rationality to development rationality, but also strengthen and lock in survival rationality.

The key lies in whether the process of marketization can open up a path for the peasants to develop rationally. For farmers with weak characteristics who are involved in the process of marketization, the institutional basis and necessary public goods provided by the state or **.

It has become an important guarantee for its rational leap.

You can use it to drown eggs and drizzled pickles.

You this involves professional knowledge, I think farming is the worst, capital as a buyer, will definitely buy **low, many foreign ** are lower than domestic, and then there is no right to negotiate, in addition to the production of food, other daily necessities have to be bought, grain can not be sold**, there is no income to buy other things.

It shows that the peasants are simple, wise, and the masters are in the people, and they are better than the actors.

What kind of atom is a patchwork car, and the parts are all removed from scrapped cars, and there are many such talents in the country.

Rational homo economicus is a neoclassical generalization of the most important human characteristics in economic activities. There are two meanings: first, individuals have the best understanding of their own interests and how to effectively improve their own interests; The second is that individuals always have a tendency to make psychological and behavioral choices

Use your own investment as little as possible to get as much profit as possible for yourself. That's how it works.

The prisoner's dilemma is a game theory system.

On one of the classics says bai

Law, to put it bluntly, is risk.

Du minimize, maximize benefits, but zhi is in front of the interests of everyone is selfish, in some occasions morality has lost its own meaning, but if you want to minimize the risk you have to rely on constantly betraying your collaborators, but the interests can only be controlled by yourself, if you want to maximize the benefits, then it is to cooperate sincerely with your collaborators, and never betray each other, so that both parties can maximize the interests and minimize the risks, but in the business situation, Often affected by certain information blockages from the outside world, as well as human morality and other factors, the prisoner's dilemma situation will occur.

Individual rationality is based on self-principle, while collective rationality is more based on circumferential interests, and when the two may conflict and unify, once the conflict occurs, individual rationality or collective rationality should be measured by moral and legal standards, and then the two will be unified or separated.

Emotional people are usually more emotional, more emotional in everything, moody, and easily influenced by emotions. And it is more likely to lose control, impulsive, emotionally fragile, and need more love than the average person. But such people have a hot heart, but not necessarily enthusiasm, and some people are cold on the outside and hot on the inside.

Rational people are usually accustomed to analyzing and solving things with a rational way of thinking, and are easy to control their emotions. Assertive, caring, and knowing how to grasp the balance when getting along with others, and being able to take good care of himself. Usually this kind of person doesn't say much, doesn't do much, and is wise to protect himself.

Both sensibility and rationality are needed in life, but it is not easy to grasp this balance. Specific people, specific things, specific grasp of rational and emotional scales!