Does the husband have the right not to let his wife go back to her parents house If the husband doe

Updated on society 2024-04-16
28 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Personal liberty is a basic right provided for by Chinese law, otherwise you cannot infringe on this right by your own actions. It stipulates this sacred right not only in the Constitution, but also in the Civil Code. Article 109 of the Civil Code stipulates that the personal freedom and personal dignity of natural persons shall be protected by law.

    The wife's return to her parents' home is undoubtedly the embodiment of personal freedom in concrete life. Returning to her parents' home not only reflects the existence of life, but also reflects the wife's due obligation to support her wife's parents.

    First of all, if the husband prevents the wife from returning to her parents' home, then the husband first violates the wife's basic right to personal freedom to return to her parents' home, which obviously violates the provisions of Article 109 of the above-mentioned Civil Code, and the wife has the right to resist against the violation of this provision. You can find the local area. Public security organs, such as women's federations, are to conduct consultation and coordination with village committees and neighborhood committees, so as to protect their own personal freedom and other related rights.

    Second, according to the second paragraph of Article 26 of the Civil Code, adult children have the obligation to support, support and protect their parents. There are many forms for children to fulfill their obligations to their parents, and paying corresponding maintenance expenses is a form of fulfilling the above-mentioned obligations. Therefore, when the wife went back to her parents' house to visit her parents, she was actually fulfilling her obligation to support the elderly with her own practical actions.

    Therefore, the husband prevents his wife from returning to her parents' home, which not only violates his own personal freedom, but also infringes on his wife's right to coax the two to be supported, which is undoubtedly illegal. It is also incorrect behavior. With regard to the mutual relationship between husband and wife, Article 1043 of the Civil Code stipulates that families shall establish a good family style, promote family virtues, and attach importance to the construction of family civilization.

    Husbands and wives should be faithful, respectful and caring for each other; Family members shall respect the elderly, love the young, help each other, and maintain equal, harmonious, and civilized marriage and family relations.

    Husband and wife should be loyal to each other, respect each other and care for each other, and should establish a harmonious family relationship of respecting the old and loving the young, and helping each other.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The husband has no right to restrict his wife's personal freedom, and it is illegal for the husband to take coercive measures to restrict his wife from returning to her parents' home. Of course, it is up to the wife to decide whether or not to go home, and she cannot just rely on the man's opinion and not go.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's still the couple's housework, it's not a crime, the husband doesn't let his wife go home, the wife can tell the husband the reason for going back to his parents' house, so that he can't object to the reason for you to go back, only find a way to persuade the husband to let him agree or accompany you back to your mother. In this way, the husband and wife will not be unhappy because of returning to their parents' home.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Of course, this is a crime, after all, it is a crime to restrict personal freedom. Everyone has the right to be free, and you can't be restricted just because he is your husband.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    There are no rights. Personal freedom is protected by law, so your husband has no right not to let you go back to your parents' home, it is your freedom to go, and if your husband just doesn't let you go, it is not illegal to take any restrictive measures, but if measures are taken to restrict your personal freedom, such as locking you at home and not letting you go, this kind of time may be guilty of illegal detention.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The husband does not have any right not to let his wife go back to her parents' house, if the husband does not let his wife go back to her parents' house, although it is not a crime, but it is not right, the wife goes back to her parents' house, it is justified, and the husband should sing with the woman. Mutual understanding, trust, and tolerance.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Your husband has no right to stop you from going back to your parents' home.

    Even if you are a husband and wife, you cannot be deprived of returning to your parents' home, which is an illegal act of restricting personal freedom.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The husband does not have the right to make his wife's personal freedom, the wife goes home to visit her parents, and she is filial, and the husband should give her full support not to let the wife go home It is wrong, the two must negotiate well, and they should not break the law.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    There is no right to interfere, it is the responsibility and obligation of the wife to support the elderly, he is saying that the legs are on you, and it is not up to him to decide whether to return to his parents, and his attitude towards your parents is also your attitude towards his parents, and it is the child's attitude towards him in the future, and parents are the best teachers for children.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    If your husband does not forcibly restrict your personal freedom, you can go back to your parents' house by reasoning, and you can go back if you should go back.

    Why didn't your husband let you go back to his parents' house? Is there any contradiction between you? If you miss your mother's home, you can go back when you have time.

    Communicate well with your husband and reason with her. Tell him that his mother's family has your family, and after a long time, he also misses his family and wants to go home to see.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Individuals do not feel the right to interfere with the freedoms of others. It is not enough to break the law, but if you force your actions and use violence to coerce and induce, you will be responsible for harming the other party.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    There is no right to restrict others. The wife can not listen to him, and if he restricts his wife's personal freedom, it is considered a crime.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    A husband has no right to keep his wife from returning to her mother's home. If he forcibly refuses to let you go back, it is actually a crime.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Since I am a husband, you are not a person who can tolerate you, he just wants to recover his wife, which is not good, behavior.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Of course, the husband has no right not to let his wife go back to her parents' house, is it wrong for people to visit his mother? Why didn't he go to the woman to be a door-to-door son-in-law? will not empathize at all, it is illegal for him to prevent the woman from visiting her parents.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    This husband has no right to not let his wife go back to her parents' house, but he can't restrict your freedom, and if you marry him, it doesn't mean that he sold you to him, and it is illegal to restrict you.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Of course, there is no right to prevent the wife from returning to her parents' home, but it is not a crime, if the husband and wife really come to this point, then there is nothing to be nostalgic for.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Of course, there is no power, and it is not a crime, communicate well, after all, it is not a big deal, I don't know if I quarrel because I went back to my parents' house.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Does a husband have the right not to let his wife go back to her parents' home? If the husband doesn't want his wife to go back to his parents' house, is it a crime?

    I don't think it's a crime, but it's not allowed.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Of course, of course, there are no rights, this is a restriction of personal freedom, and it is definitely a crime.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Although it is not illegal to say this, it is also unreasonable, and there is no way to prevent the other party from going back to his parents' house.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    It is certainly not possible to restrict the personal freedom of others, which is against the law.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Summary. Hello dear, it's an honor to answer for you; The husband does not let his wife go back to her parents' house to break the law; If there is no divorce, the woman is kicked out of the house, and if the circumstances are serious, the woman can sue the man for the crime of abandonment and make him bear the responsibility. Husbands and wives have the obligation to support each other; The act of abandonment must reach the level of aggravating circumstances in order to constitute a crime.

    Does the husband break the law by not letting his wife go back to her parents' house?

    Hello dear, it's an honor to answer for you; The husband did not let the lead destroyer wife go back to her parents' house to break the law; If there is no divorce, the woman will be kicked out of the house, and if the circumstances are serious, the woman can sue the man for the crime of abandonment, so that Xianxiang can bear the responsibility. Husbands and wives have the obligation to support each other; The act of abandonment must reach the level of aggravating circumstances in order to constitute a crime.

    Legal basis: Article 261 of the Criminal Law The crime of abandonment is to refuse to support a person who is old, young, sick, or has no independent life and can be honored with filial piety, and the circumstances are heinous, shall be sentenced to five years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release.

    Is it illegal not to let my wife contact her parents?

    Pro, illegal, violated the wife's freedom of life.

    Go to the ** sue. You can call the police first.

    It is illegal to view the content of mobile phone chats.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Summary. Dear, I'm glad to answer for you that it's not illegal for your wife to go back to her parents' house and not pick him up. Non-state statutory organs must not restrict the personal liberty of others by any person or organization on the basis of legally-prescribed reasons and procedures.

    Therefore, if the woman's parents force the woman not to come back, then it is a crime. But if the woman herself is unwilling to come back under persuasion, it is another matter, the woman can neither be forced by her parents not to come back, and certainly not to be forced to come back by you.

    Dear, I'm glad to answer for you that it's not illegal for your wife to go back to her parents' house and not pick him up. Non-state statutory organs must not restrict the personal liberty of others by any person or organization on the basis of legally-prescribed reasons and procedures. Therefore, if the woman's parents are forcing the old woman not to come back, then it is a crime.

    But if the woman is unwilling to come back under persuasion, it is another matter, the woman can neither be forced by her parents not to come back, and of course her relatives cannot be forced to come back by you.

    First of all, the first is the negotiation process. The reason why the wife didn't come back when she went back to her parents' house was because of the quarrel between the two parties, or because the filial piety was rotten and the relationship had been broken. If you need to go to the bottom of the divorce, you can only sue for divorce if you can't negotiate it.

    The key to the court's decision on divorce is whether the relationship between the two parties has been broken. The main bases are: bigamy or cohabitation with another person, there are people who have repeatedly taught and refused to change their habits, and those who have been separated for two years due to emotional discord.

    According to Article 31 of the "Marriage Law", if a man and a woman divorce voluntarily are voluntary, the divorce shall be granted. Both parties must apply for divorce at the marriage registration office. A divorce certificate is issued when the marriage registration authority ascertains that the parties are indeed willing and that the issues of children and property have been properly addressed.

    Article 32: Where one of the men and women in divorce proceedings requests a divorce, the relevant departments may conduct mediation or directly submit divorce proceedings to the people's courts. People's courts hearing divorce cases shall conduct mediation; If the relationship is indeed broken, mediation is ineffective and the divorce should be granted. In any of the following circumstances, if mediation fails, a divorce shall be granted:

    1) bigamy or cohabitation of a person with a spouse; (2) Committing family baoli or abusing or abandoning family members; (3) There are old drafts of du, absorbing du, etc., and they have been repeatedly taught and not changed; (4) They have been separated for two years due to emotional discord; (5) Other circumstances that lead to a break in the relationship between husband and wife. If one party is declared missing and the other party initiates divorce proceedings, the divorce shall be granted.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    My wife won't let you go back to your parents' house, maybe because you're too busy with work, or because you and her parents don't agree and don't want to cause conflicts, so they don't let you go back.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Why bother with the pointless.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Because you have a bad temper, and you are afraid that you will say the wrong thing.

    The bureau told you that the relationship between your husband and wife is not good, and she doesn't want to take you back.

    Father-in-law and mother-in-law don't like trembling or you.

    In short, it's weird, you should buy a gift in advance and follow your wife Yitongchun.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    Legal Analysis: Depends on the circumstances. Husbands and wives have the obligation to support each other.

    If one of the spouses is sick or incapable of independent living, and the other spouse refuses to support him, he or she is guilty of the crime of abandonment, and if the circumstances are heinous, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years, short-term detention or public surveillance.

    Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Article 1059 Husbands and wives have the obligation to support each other. The party in need of maintenance has the right to demand maintenance from the other party if the other party fails to perform the maintenance obligation.

Related questions
11 answers2024-04-16

Natural rights are the rights that people should enjoy at birth, which are not constrained by economic conditions and objective factors, and are an idealized form of rights, natural rights (natural right) are derived from the Latin jus nafural, and the Chinese customary translation is natural human rights, which refers to the universal inherent rights of natural creatures, and is not given by law or faith. Natural rights are innate, inalienable, inalienable, and theoretically existent. Natural rights are important interests that are common to natural organisms and that any individual may claim to the object of the genus or to other species or societies. >>>More

20 answers2024-04-16

Do you always ask about the past? What does that have to do with you? If you don't want to be his past, settle down!

14 answers2024-04-16

The property does not have the right to stop the owner's right to use the elevator (except for the monthly maintenance of the elevator on time). If the landlord is in arrears on strata fees. >>>More

7 answers2024-04-16

The first in line of succession in the Inheritance Act is the spouse, children and parents of the decedent. Therefore, if Zhao's son A did not die, Zhao's property should be inherited by Zhao's wife and Zhao. Now that Zhao's son died before Zhao, according to the provisions of "if the widowed daughter-in-law has fulfilled the main maintenance obligation to her father-in-law and mother-in-law, and the widowed son-in-law has fulfilled the main maintenance obligation to her father-in-law and mother-in-law, she shall be the first-order heir", assuming that B has fulfilled the maintenance obligation to Zhao, Zhao's wife, B and C should inherit Zhao's property, and the inheritance basis of C is "if the child of the decedent dies before the decedent, the direct blood relatives of the children of the decedent shall inherit by subrogation". >>>More

4 answers2024-04-16

Honey, nickname, baby, good girl, heart, etc.