What is the difference between a dead world and a living world?

The meaning of human life is to realize one second in advance, to realize where this life comes from, what is the reason for being born into this world, why is it born in this body, why there are animals, why do you have to die since you have been born, where is death going or rebirth, why everything is impermanent, why people are born and immediately distinguish between rich and poor, high and low, what determines their unequal fate. If a person has not figured out these problems, no matter how comfortable and comfortable his life is, he will be an extremely miserable and pitiful person after all, and the meaning of his life only exists in the opposite of "enlightenment". There is no greater joy in life than to enjoy the real life that true wisdom brings to us and the process of sharing wisdom with others.

The Buddha taught in the Diamond Sutra that the mind cannot be attained in the past, the mind cannot be attained in the present, and the mind cannot be attained in the future. This is the ultimate teaching, which is difficult for others to understand at once, and from a logical point of view, if the future is real, then it means that we will always stay in the present, and if the present is real, then it is ridiculous to mention the past.

But what appears in front of us is: talking about the future, the future becomes the present in an instant, saying that the present becomes the past in an instant, saying that we are their past in the mouth of the future, but in the eyes of the people of the past we have become their future. If there is no future, why should we define a present in one move, and if there is no present, why should we define a past in one fell swoop?

To say that it is not valid, to say that it is not and cannot be established. The root of the problem lies in the fact that time does not have its true nature, since its essence does not exist, how can it be given a positive or negative conclusion, because our own mind is over-positioned to the concept, and there are so many contradictions, life and death are contradictory abstract concepts, let's talk about it first"Raw"If everything was meant to be, then define"Raw"The concept is that it is redundant, but if everything is not in the first place, it is violated"Raw"The cause of the phenomenon, let's talk about it"Dead"If everything is originally nothing, then redefine"Dead"The concept is redundant, and to say that everything is meant is contrary to the current presentation"Dead"The cause of the phenomenon. Therefore, if life and death have real meaning, it becomes a serious paradox, and the two are only the transformation of the self-manifestation of the mind, and have no real meaning. defined"The concept of life"It's like implying that somebody else is defining one at the same time"The concept of death"Otherwise, it would be ridiculous and superfluous to define any one of them alone, and it would be untrue to live even though it is alive.

Death cannot be utterly destroyed, because where does life come from? In this case, the landlord can only be at ease if he looks at life and death.

I originally sought the heart, not the Buddha.

Knowing that the Three Realms are empty.

If you ask the Buddha to ask for the heart.

Only this heart is a Buddha.

I think death is like sleeping, sleeping soundly and not even dreaming, there is no thinking, nothing is known, there is no concept of time and space, life is just a transient thinking, dispensable in the big universe, but the ancestors have more chances to survive because of the existence of the gene of fear of death, the desire to survive is getting stronger and stronger, and the thinking is getting stronger and stronger, we are just a bearer Maybe our descendants are really life They may know what happens after death.

Survival is a few decades of interruption, and in these decades, we had better complete everything we should accomplish, not let our lives leave any regrets, and be willing to close our eyes at the moment of death.

It's better not to die until you have to, because after a few decades, there will be time for you to sleep and you won't wake up.

The same world is no different.

Lost what you have now.

How are the three thousand worlds different?

Agree with the concept of the first floor, just like human beings will lose 21 grams of weight just after death, but they can't be confirmed, only the dead will know what it looks like after death, I personally think that the existence is large, whether death is like sleeping forever, or there is a so-called thinking space, another parallel universe, are all human ideas, whether there is a soul or not, I think there is, the generation of life in the universe is strange, given the earth a suitable environment for life to live in the so-called life, Life is a sophisticated instrument, and the oxygen content is gradually balanced, refreshing the so-called dinosaur era, the trolls have disappeared, only degraded animals remain, and acquired animals, only human beings have appeared, human beings have given the earth a big decoration, and the solar system structure is too exquisite, so death I guess it's not so simple, every minute and every second someone dies from time to time, is it forever? However, the opinion on the first floor is too absolute, the soul itself belongs to metaphysics, even if it involves quantum mechanics, but there is still only this concept that exists, and it cannot be proven, so you have to keep a skeptical attitude, live in the present, don't think about death, life and death have their own destiny, and we should always leave when the earth should change blood, as if life is a big hourglass, and the clockwork that is set for time has stopped, and it is time to leave, but I hope that it is not as Buddhism says about rebirth, and I think that the people and things now are enough, It's too tiring to do it all over again, and I'd rather disappear forever to choose between reincarnation and disappearing forever, so I believe that souls exist.

Is this a game, if not, it depends on what you think.

1."To live or to perish, it's a question worth considering".

This is one of Shakespeare's four great tragedies, Hamlet

Hamlet's most famous monologue appears in Act III, Scene 1, reflecting his troubles and disappointments, anguish and hesitation under pressure. The original text is "to be, or not to be: that is the question", and there are different translations.

Among them, the most classic of Mr. Zhu Shenghao is "to survive or to destroy, this is a question worth considering". Other translations include: Cao Weifeng's translation".

To survive or not to survive: that's the question" and so on.

There has always been a great deal of controversy over "to be, or not to be", and there are different translations, in addition to the above two, there is also ".

To live or to die", to live or not to live, to resist or not to resist", ".

To act or not to act", "to commit suicide or not to commit suicide", and so on.

2.The Indian poet Rabindranath Tagore is a world-famous and versatile writer, who has written more than 50 poetry collections, 12 medium-length novels, more than 100 short stories, more than 200 plays and many literary, philosophical, political and memoirs in his long career of more than 60 years

Travelogues, books, etc.

Tagore's 1913 Nobel Prize for Literature was his poem published in England.

Collection of Gitanjali - The Hungry Stone, (generally translated as Gitanjali in China, Gitanjali, Bengali originally means "hymn to God").

"Death" refers to the disappearance of life, and the object is generally a living thing.

Survival: Survival, Survival, and Our Attitudes [Words]: Survival.

Zhuyin]: shēng cún

Interpretation]: 1Alive; Stay alive. 2.Refers to a living person. 3.Exist. 4.Life.

Definition]: A general term for all things that exist in nature to maintain their existence and develop and change. It usually refers to the existence and growth of living systems, which include biological systems and ecosystems, such as microorganisms, plants, animals, etc., which are living systems, and ecosystems are the forms in which a variety of organisms coexist with the natural environment.

Characteristics]: Growth, adaptation, and reproduction. For example, a person, a tree, and a forest are living systems, which grow through metabolism, reproduce through genetic reproduction, and evolve through adaptation to the environment.

Generally speaking]: The social system, like the living system, also lives in the environment. The social system is a system composed of economic, political and cultural relations between social people and them, such as a family, a company, an association, and a political party.

The social system, like the living system, has the functions of growth, adaptation and evolution, and the process of an organization from its formation to development, growth, expansion, crisis, decline, closure and reconstruction is a process of growth and evolution. In addition, the social system exists, depends on and acts on the natural environment, and the ecosystem becomes an important support for the social system, and the social system also has an important impact on the ecosystem.