Why do we say that human beings have destroyed the laws of nature?

There are things in the world that are morally different from those in reality.

To say that humans are destroying the laws of nature by killing animals is, of course, morally theoretical, even in animals, and that the panda's weak ability to survive is certainly not as strong as the fly's ability to survive, and it stands to reason that the fly should survive in the fight against nature, and the panda should be eliminated by nature, but people will be praised for killing flies, and harming pandas will be condemned.

So a lot of things are unclear, strong and weak, life or death, right or wrong, with so much emotion mixed in, and sometimes it all depends on a mouth, a so-called expert's mouth.

The law of the jungle is for animals, and there is no such thing as the jungle for humans!

The weak are strong"food"!Note that it is for eating!

And most of what humans hunt is not for food!

Because: although human beings have wisdom that is different from other creatures, and have more outrageous ideas that want to transcend reality, but the world is the same way, no matter how high your wisdom is, what kind of medicine you have, going to destruction is the inevitable result of known time and space, but there are differences in form, speed and slowness.

All the practices of human beings to improve their own living standards are in essence drinking water to quench their thirst, which is against balance.

The ecology of nature is mutually sustaining, like insects destroying trees, woodpeckers eating insects, leopards eating birds, and people hunting leopards.

People are such cheap higher animals, maybe one person hunts a lot of wild animals, and it will be fine, but if a crocodile or other carnivore kills 10 people, then the animal will also be hunted, and its kind will be named a dangerous animal

The simplest examples illustrate the simplest truths.

Some people are cheap, cheap is just one word, I only say it once.

It is very right for the jungle to eat the strong, and it is understandable for humans to hunt other animals, but after all, human beings are only a member of nature, and it is just a spirit that people pursue, so if human beings want to exist for a long time, they can only and must follow the law of balance in nature.

Sometimes the value of an animal's existence is far greater than the value of killing it for its hair, flesh and bones, and the reason why people prohibit indiscriminate killing and protect it is a way for people to take a long-term view of people and natural resources.

People destroy the living environment of animals.

Liu Huaqiang's philosophy of life --- the law of the jungle.

Human beings have destroyed the rules of nature by destroying a lot of water resources, land resources, and some rare animals that have survived since ancient times.

Now that there are those spoilers who are in the first place, human beings are still living according to the laws of nature.

The law of the jungle is the "law of the jungle" in the wildlife world, which includes two basic attributes: first, its natural attributes; The other is its social nature. Natural attributes are objectively influenced by nature, and are not affected by human nature and social factors.

All living things in nature will maintain a balanced survival and development in accordance with the laws of natural survival. Its social attributes are generally reflected in the animal kingdom, as a higher animal, man can change the natural attributes of the law of the jungle to maintain the environment for human survival and development, which is also the law of survival that human society should abide by.

In the natural world, as the intelligent life at the top of the food chain, if human beings act in full accordance with the law of the jungle and consume resources without restrictions, this will destroy the balanced development of nature, and eventually destroy the natural world and affect the survival of human beings themselves, that is, the law of the jungle will destroy human beings themselves. Therefore, everyone has the responsibility to protect nature and maintain the balanced development of nature.

Sympathy for the weak is an expression of people's kindness, and people's sympathy for the weak is the most basic moral concept of mankind and is also the fine quality of the Chinese nation. It is the common responsibility of mankind to dialectically understand the law of the jungle of "the law of the jungle" and the moral concept of "sympathy for the weak", to reasonably limit the scope of human activities, and to achieve the harmonious development of human social activities and the natural world. Only in this way can human society and nature develop in a balanced, orderly and sustainable manner.

If this balance of nature is disrupted, it will bring disaster to the world.

People have compassion, and I think that's what makes us humans, and that's what we're like as higher animals.

Nature follows all the laws of the strong, but sympathy for the weak is recognized by human society as not being brought.

Because there is a difference between humans and animals after all, people will gradually begin to sympathize with people after a certain stage of development.

I also don't know that there is no way to survive the law of the jungle, and sympathy for the weak is also recognized.

It can only be said that human beings are very emotional animals, but sometimes if necessary, follow the law of the jungle, that is, bullying the weak, so that no one can sympathize with the strong.

The law of survival of animals is represented by the law of the jungle, and the strong will always stand at the top of the food chain. Human beings are also animals, but different from other creatures, human beings have thoughts, feelings, can make things, transform nature, have love, helpful, this is the performance of higher animals, people also sometimes fight between people, but this is only a small contradiction, not to kill each other, some people are born weak and live hard, people use love to care for him, help him, and coexist peacefully.

The law of the strong is right, but people must have compassion and social morality.

Maybe it's a little more human, or it's like a beast.

The law of nature is misunderstood by some mammals who think they are superior, but there is no such law in nature.

It is the law of nature. It is also a social law. This law has been practiced since there were living things on earth.

No one can change him. The natural world has always been a matter of natural selection, selecting the fittest. This law guarantees the evolution and development of human society and natural organisms.

This law has been applied in the past, and it will continue to be applied in the future. In other words, it is reasonable for this law to exist. This law promotes the strong in nature to become stronger, and the weak to constantly abandon their own backwardness and pursue the advanced in order to survive.

Regardless of which species are resisting, they are actively selecting the fittest, thus ensuring the evolution of nature. Promote the natural world and human society to continuously improve their own quality.

Do you mean that the weak should be bullied? It's a grievance for the weak. This kind of injustice has existed since the emergence of the system of selfishness.

In Chinese history, from Chen Sheng and Wu Guang to the Yellow Turban Uprising and the May Fourth Movement, they are all shouting loudly and trying to eradicate injustice. With the development of society to the present day, China's socialist system marks China's leading position in the social system. The Chinese people enjoy extensive freedom.

But the phenomenon of the weak being bullied by the Wu Tan that you said still exists. The difference will always be there and will always be there.

This is true of a person, and so is it of a people. If you want not to be bullied, you have to make yourself strong. Only when we are strong can we have the ability to change the phenomenon of the jungle.