Legal Business Questions Help, Questions about Business Law

I said, why are you bothered, how much money can you have for half of it?

This matter, it's useless to say that the law, so you have to consider the judicial cost of some money, right, hehe.

Half a month's salary, how much can a small worker have?Is it enough for you to pay for your lawyer's fees? You go back and forth to the court, respond to the lawsuit, and in the end, if you lose the lawsuit and add the legal fees, why bother?

It's not that I won't give you a legal answer, it's just that if the conditions are good, there is no need for that little girl to come to work. If you can hire workers, you can be benevolent, so why care about a little money, just give it. In this world, it is not only the law that balances interests.

Be open-minded, tolerant of all rivers, tolerant of everything.

If you really want to hear the answer: there is an agreement in the contract, from the agreement. You are an oral contract, try to say that it is not agreed, and it will be handled in accordance with the provisions of the labor law. No deduction of wages is permitted. Moreover, even if there is an agreement, such an agreement is not valid.

About your addition: Didn't I tell you, people are not afraid to wear shoes barefoot when they toss. 1150 is not much, it really goes to court, 1150 is not enough to hire a lawyer to write a defense for you, hehe.

Moreover, as I said, you can only lose this lawsuit. Because the Labor Contract Law stipulates that employees shall not be deducted from wages and bonuses for any reason, nor shall they receive any form of security deposit and deposit in disguise. Therefore, even if you agree to it, it is not a valid clause.

What's more, you're just verbally agreeing. If you lose the lawsuit, you will have 1,200 yuan in legal fees. Not counting the lawyer's fees, if the court will rule that you should bear the reasonable expenses in order to get the money back, if the other party opens up again, how cost-effective do you say?

Hehe, I want to open a little, I don't have much money, and she should have gotten it. You've given the picture a clean idea. In the future, you can hire more people.

Your agreement is null and void, and you should pay the full salary, but she must give 30 days' notice of her resignation.

If she leaves without asking for leave, it is a serious violation of labor discipline, and you can unilaterally terminate her, but the salary still has to be paid.

Hello, two questions are answered separately for you.

Answer to question 1:

First of all, whether an offer can be revoked does not depend on the specified commitment period of the offer, but on the time when the offer reaches the offeree. Although the vast majority of offers arrive before the commitment period.

Secondly, in this case, according to the provisions of Article 19, Paragraph 1 of the Contract Law, the offer is irrevocable. Cheung Kong cannot withdraw the offer.

Answer to question 2:

Article 28 of the Contract Law stipulates that if the offeree makes a commitment beyond the commitment period, it shall be a new offer, unless the offeror promptly notifies the offeree that the commitment is valid.

Therefore, what Changjiang Company issued was a "new offer", and if Sihai Company did not comment on it, the contract had not yet been concluded.

Answer 1: If you want to withdraw the cooperation offer before August 20, you need to negotiate with the other party, and the other party can only contact if you agree.

Answer 2: Because the cooperation offer sent by Sihai Construction Company has expired at the time of the reply letter on August 22, the commitment issued by Cheung Kong Group received on August 22 is no longer binding on Sihai Company. It belongs to other agreed relationships, and it is not a unified relationship with the previous Sihai sent to the Yangtze River Group, and it exists independently.

Sihai Company was unable to exercise the right of withdrawal because the offer required a commitment period;

The undertaking issued by CK shall be deemed to be a new offer after the validity of the Offer.

It is an invitation to make an offer and the right of withdrawal can be exercised.

1. Sihai Company may revoke the offer in accordance with the provisions of the law;

2. If the undertaking issued by Cheung Kong meets the requirements of the offer, it is a new offer.

Zhang's refusal to pay the full amount of the house price is an act of first performing the right of defense, and the two parties bear debts to each other, and when the party that performs later has a statutory circumstance that may jeopardize the realization of the debts of the party that performed first, the party that performed the debt first may suspend the performance of the debt;

Sun's claim was groundless in law, and his breach of contract was the first;

Deduct the cost of air conditioning from the house price, pay the full price of the house, and obtain the ownership of the house.

First, Mr. Zhang asserted the right of uneasiness defence. The woman has an obligation to fulfill first.

The second question is that Ms. Sun has an obligation to perform, and the act of removing the air conditioner is an anticipatory breach of contract. Therefore, she has no right to claim that Mr. Zhang is in breach of contract.

Thirdly, Mr. Zhang can choose the best compensation method among liquidated damages and deposits. Ms. Sun lost the case and was liable for the litigation costs.

Feel free to ask! By the way, which school you are from, this classroom looks so familiar with the rhythm

Immediately sue for copying, and at the same time search for other assets of the company, and apply for property preservation, the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.

Where the applicant does not initiate litigation within 15 days after the people's court takes preservation measures, the people's court shall lift the property preservation.

Article 94: Property preservation is limited to the scope of the request, or property related to the case.

Property preservation is to employ sealing, seizure, freezing, or other methods prescribed by law.

After the people's court freezes assets, it shall immediately notify the person whose assets have been frozen.

Where assets have already been sealed or frozen, they must not be sealed or frozen repeatedly.

Article 95: Where the subject of the application provides a guarantee, the people's court shall lift the property preservation.

1. The 300,000 on the account must be yours. But there is still a gap of more than a million.

2. How does the company deal with the goods?

Home thing, because the contract stipulates that the company only has the obligation to pay you, and there is no obligation not to ** the goods. So you shouldn't bother with the goods being transferred away.

3. According to the contract, the company still owes you more than one million.

4. Since the company has sold the goods, it should have payment.

5. Find a lawyer, sue, and let the court decide.

6. The judgment must be that the company is ordered to perform its payment obligations in accordance with the contract.

7. If the company fulfills the payment, it is best. If it is not performed, then the court is requested to enforce it, and the company's property is liquidated for compensation.

8. If the company's property is insufficient to repay the debts after liquidation, and you have evidence of the company's malicious transfer of goods and funds, you can report the person in charge of the company to the public security bureau or the procuratorate for contract fraud.

Get the 300,000 in hand first, and the rest will be implemented slowly. This kind of ** risk, everyone knows it! This is not a reason not to pay!

After applying for property preservation, hurry up and sue to let the other party bear the liability for breach of contract and compensate for your losses!

Resolved through litigation. Filing a lawsuit within 15 days after the preservation is made.