If there is such a conflict with an Internet company, how can I resolve it?

The lawyer's analysis makes sense.

According to the provisions of the Contract Law, for a contract that has not yet taken effect, both parties to the contract have the right to repent, not to perform the contract, and you can request a refund from the other party.

In addition, the other party did not clearly stipulate the monthly subscription fee in the contract, which shows that the other party is using the contract for illegal purposes. In fact, you can see that the contract signed by both of you is a problem contract. You can ask the other party for a refund, and if the negotiation fails, you can apply for arbitration or litigation.

Did you pay? If not, you can reconsider whether to use this company's services.

If you have already paid for it, the fax they give you is proof that the minimum consumption that was previously agreed upon has changed and the minimum consumption that is now available. Then, you can terminate the contract accordingly.

If the network company breaches the contract first, it can mediate privately, and if it cannot reach a unanimous agreement, it will sue it;

Claims for compensation for economic losses, liquidated damages, and compensation for the company's reputation.

They misunderstood that the effective date of the contract is from the date of signature and seal of the contract, and the date that is not specifically determined is also binding, and the specific date should be determined by behavior or specific negotiation, rather than a contract that is not binding, and the loophole can also be supplemented.

You can claim the return of unjust enrichment, after the contract is terminated.

1. When there is a conflict between the company's employees, the leader's handling opinions are very important.

In the company, if the leaders and management can not deal with the small conflicts between employees fairly and justly, then the development of the work and the convincing in front of the company's employees will be an obstacle. As a leader, you will lose the trust of your employees, and you will inevitably encounter difficulties in carrying out your work in the future.

Second, as a leader, he will maintain his own bottom line when dealing with employee conflicts.

In the company, even as a leader is to serve the company and employees collectively, not their own family, what to do what they want, who they want to fire, who they want to pardon, this bottom line is a person's professional ethics, so if you want to be a good leader, you must have your own professional ethics and conduct, deal with things impartially, and do not engage in favoritism.

3. Dealing with employee conflicts in the company and favoring subordinates with high positions will become unreasonable even if they are reasonable.

No matter in which industry or on which occasion, when dealing with conflicts, everyone basically adheres to the principle of helping the manager and not helping the relatives, so that everyone can determine the final handling opinion. Therefore, as a leader, if he favors a subordinate with a high position, even if the subordinate himself is the party that occupies the reason, after unfair treatment, everyone will think that the subordinate is the party who is at fault, so this is not really a way and way to help the other party, but to give advice to the other party from a pertinent perspective. Great Na Jing.