How to view the theory of China s responsibility and discuss the responsibility of the state

Responsibility is to fulfill one's responsibilities. From the perspective of China's economy, fulfilling its responsibilities emphasizes the connotation of China's responsibility. That is, the first task at the moment is to get your own affairs done.

From the perspective of global governance, each fulfilling its responsibilities underscores the extension of China's responsibilities. That is, China's responsibilities in global economic affairs must reflect the reciprocity of rights and obligations.

State responsibility in the context of international law:

Broadly speaking, "State responsibility refers to the international legal responsibility of a State for an internationally wrongful act or act of injury". "In a narrow sense, State responsibility is the legal consequences arising from an internationally wrongful act of a State. In defining State responsibility, Mr. Wang Tieya pointed out that "such wrongful acts have certain consequences under international law".

Oppenheim's International Law (9th Edition) holds that "failure to comply with an international obligation constitutes an internationally wrongful act of a State, giving rise to the international responsibility of that State, and thus entailing certain legal consequences for that State." "John O'Brien noted":

The subject matter of State responsibility relates to the circumstances in which a State may be found to be in breach of an international obligation and the possible consequences therefrom. ”

There are several specific ways in which the State can assume responsibility:

Limit national sovereignty, which refers to the right of supreme domination at home, the right to independence from outside the country, and the right to resist any foreign interference and aggression. The content of national sovereignty includes three aspects: political sovereignty, economic sovereignty and judicial sovereignty. Restricting national sovereignty means that the exercise of national sovereignty is controlled within a certain scope in the above three aspects.

The fulfilment of this duty to suspend a wrongful act does not depend on the completion of the act as a whole, unless the relevant international right or obligation has been modified, terminated or the wrongful act has been excused, and the obligation of the State to cease the wrongful act once it has been committed is absolute and unconditional. The cessation of the wrongful act does not affect the responsibility already arising from the act stopped, but only reduces the responsibility for that act.

Restitution refers to the obligation of the State responsible for the commission of an internationally wrongful act to restore the aggrieved matter to the situation that existed before the wrongful act was committed. The injured State has the right to demand reparation and restitution from the State responsible for the internationally wrongful act. Such an approach requires that it must be factually feasible and based on the principle of equity, and should not undermine the political independence and economic stability of the compensating State.

Reparations, the Permanent Court of International Justice, through the Chorzów Plant case, has set forth a principle of international law that a breach of a commitment entails an obligation to pay full compensation. Sufficiency here means the elimination of all consequences of the unlawful act. The determination of the amount of compensation is based on the rules of international law and does not recognize the validity of the rules of domestic law.

In the view of the International Law Commission, full compensation should be given for damage caused solely as a direct result of the unlawful act. Damage caused solely by an unlawful act, although the consequences of which are not directly linked to the act but are linked to a series of related and causal events, should also be compensated adequately, taking into account whether the victim was negligent.

Apology, as a form of legal responsibility generally applicable in international practice, refers to the form of responsibility of the State responsible for committing an internationally wrongful act to apologize to the injured State for its act and to provide moral satisfaction to the victim. This is a form of compensation for moral damage, which theoretically applies to all acts of damage. For example, in the Sino-US plane collision incident in Hainan, China demands that the United States apologize in a public manner.

Excerpt from Liu Jia, State Responsibility in International Law

Western capitalism is characterized by mercenary. Look at who has a good life, and your eyes will be red. It's okay to make something to mess with you.

Behind China's theory of responsibility is the West's theory of not using responsibility.

Because our national strength has increased.

1.As a major country, China has indispensable responsibilities in some areas, such as international financial stability, Asia-Pacific security and stability, global environment, world health, regional sensitive issues, international food stability, and international stability of important resources.

2.As a rising country, it has begun to play an increasingly obvious coordinating role in a number of international issues. Some areas are safe, and major events are global.

3.As a populous country, it plays an important role in the number of human populations, in managing more than one billion people, and in maintaining the basic stability of the world.

State responsibility (also known as the international responsibility of a State) is the international legal responsibility of a State for its internationally wrongful acts.

The main body of this is the State, and it is mainly caused by international wrongful acts and international crimes.

International responsibility for injury caused by acts not prohibited by international law is a new development that engulfs international responsibility.

Responsibility is a duty and a task. The rules and regulations that individual members of society must follow are mandatory. It appeared with the emergence of human society, and with society comes responsibility.

A sense of responsibility is an important indicator of a person's spiritual quality. Responsibility arises from mutual commitment in social relations. On the social stage, each role often implies a responsibility.

When we take on a responsibility, there is a price to pay, but it also means the right to be rewarded.

The social ruler will be developing, the connotation of responsibility is also developing, the great practice of reform and opening up and modernization, and the increasingly rich content of the times will be given to the responsibility of the high. A responsible power, a responsible **, a responsible citizen.