The Haoying crash test incident sparked heated discussions among netizens and caused the China Insur

The key is to look at the words. Stolen, and posted on the official website.

Just these two things. You are worth pondering.

What people steal. And it's also published on your official website. Then there is the need to make adjustments. These are the key points of the discussion. The text has not changed the data at all, which means that the data is likely to be true. And it's just on your website.

It's too early to say anything, the results leaked in advance, whether they are true or false or have to wait for the official announcement, why not wait?

After nearly half a year of silence, the China Insurance Research Institute finally made a comeback, and today announced the crash test results of 5 models at one time, including the controversial Haoying.

The five models tested by the China Insurance Research Institute in this test are Great Wall Haval H6 (2020 model), Guangqi Honda Haoying (2020 model), Geely Lynk & Co 03 (2019 model), FAW Mazda Atez (2020 model), and SAIC Volkswagen Passat (2020 model) Five model evaluation results, of which Passat is the model that independently applied for testing.

In terms of results, Haoying's scores in the 25% offset and side impact tests were both "A (good smile)", and the crashworthiness and maintenance economy scores were "P (poor)", and the rest of the scores were excellent, consistent with the previously leaked results.

However, it can still be clearly seen that Haoying bent the A-pillar in the 25% offset collision released by the China Insurance Research Institute, and even so, it can still get a good rating.

In addition, the Passat's test results were significantly different from previous results, with excellent ratings in all sub-tests, as well as good ratings for crashworthiness and limb repair economy.

However, it should be noted that the Passat tested by the China Insurance Research Institute this time is also a 2020 model vehicle directly purchased from the 4S store, and it is not sent for testing by the manufacturer, so there should be no special version, which means that SAIC Volkswagen should have quietly upgraded the body structure of the Passat.

However, after the Haoying incident, it is unknown how much credibility of the China Insurance Research Institute remains, so the **Passat collision results announced this time are undoubtedly the beginning of a round of verbal criticism.

Who stole the collision data of Haoying's Zhongbaoyan? Officially, it was never released.

Written by Li Chenchen.

A few days ago, the China Insurance Research Institute announced the SUV model-Guangqi Honda Haoying's test ** and related **, from the test** we can see that in the frontal 25% offset crash test project, the A-pillar part of the Haoying was significantly deformed after the collision, and then the collision project on the side of the body, the B-pillar part was also deformed, we all know that if the deformation in these two places is extremely dangerous for the passengers in the car, according to the usual practice, the test results will be announced** It was released a week later, and sure enough, "enthusiastic" netizens "inadvertently" got Haoying's test results by modifying the C-IASI official website**; And just after people saw the report card, they were surprised, from the ** we can see that in addition to the crashworthiness and maintenance economy index is P poor, other items such as the car occupant safety index, the car alien safety index and other items have received G excellent evaluation; And the most important thing is that in the frontal 25% offset collision, Haoying got a good evaluation, which made people surprised, and the Passat not long ago was "ruined" because of the fracture of the A-pillar during the test, so why is Haoying different? Isn't even the China Insurance Research Institute "out of the ordinary"?

<> just when many people expressed their doubts, the main advocate developed a speech, claiming: "We have not released the test results of Honda Haoying in any form so far", and said that the relevant test results were stolen, and the relevant responsibility will be investigated for the police, and the test results of Honda Haoying will be announced at another time.

<> successive "melons" made netizens feel full, and some netizens said: During this time, Honda fans can be said to have risen from hell to heaven, and before they stayed for a while, they fell again; The meaning of ridicule is obvious. That's right, when Haoying's**and** was announced, Honda fans were terrified, thinking "It's okay now, Haoying has become the next Passat" but they didn't think about it, when the "test results" came out, they came to a peak, and they had to fly happily from hell to heaven.

But only a while later, the official statement of the China Insurance Research Institute came down, saying that "I haven't sent it", and the mood of Honda fans is like a roller coaster, which makes people laugh.

In addition, many netizens said that it is estimated that the China Insurance Research Institute has affected the interests of too many people and wants to stigmatize the China Insurance Research Institute, although the idea is a little "dark" but it seems reasonable; Some people think that this farce is just a play directed and acted by the China Insurance Research Institute, and jokingly call the China Insurance Research Institute "recharge research", which is thought-provoking. What do you think about this?

Today, when cars have been basically popularized, car safety is also more and more valued by consumers, and when buying a car, they will still pay attention to the safety performance and configuration of the vehicle. In addition to C-NCAP, the domestic safety evaluation agency is the China Insurance Research Institute, and after C-NCAP was praised as a five-star wholesale department, the China Insurance Research Institute has attracted more and more attention from consumers.

Screenshot of China Insurance Research Institute**).

Why are consumers "optimistic" about the China Insurance Research Institute, because 18 of the 20 shareholders of this organization are well-known insurance companies in China, and the purpose of their establishment of the China Insurance Research Institute is to test the vulnerability of popular vehicles in the event of a collision, as well as the injury of the "occupants" in Changshuzhou, and to evaluate this, so as to guide the insurance pricing of the model.

From this point of view, the purpose of the crash test of the China Insurance Research Institute can not be mixed with a little "selfishness" for car companies, and to a certain extent, it seems more fair. In addition, the China Insurance Research Institute uses the same 25% offset collision as the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) in the United States, which can better reflect the hazard status of real collision accidents, so for a long time after its establishment, it is considered to be a domestic evaluation institution with higher public trust hail power.

Passat 25% offset collision, according to the China Insurance Research Institute**).

Passat 25% offset collision results, screenshot of China Insurance Research Institute**).

The most impressive one was the Passat's crash test, in which the A-pillar was bent in a 25% offset collision and was given the lowest evaluation of P, which detonated the Internet discussion and made the China Insurance Research Institute reach the "peak" of credibility. But all of this changed dramatically after a Shadow crash test.

On June 12th, the ** of the China Insurance Research Institute released the crash test of Guangqi Honda Haoying**, from which it can be seen that in the 25% offset collision, the A-pillar of Haoying has a relatively obvious bend, which has basically been broken, and the head of the dummy in the car has also been hit, judging from such a collision result, many netizens have speculated that Haoying may follow in the footsteps of the Passat.

Shadow 25% offset collision).

But the strange thing is that on June 19th, the official ** of the China Insurance Research Institute appeared Haoying's crash test results, 25% of the offset crash test A pillar bent Haoying actually got a (good) result, and the front and rear rows are not equipped with side air curtains, resulting in an obvious impact on the head of the dummy in the car, and the occupant safety index of the car also won G (excellent). This has caused a lot of controversy on the Internet, and even many netizens are speculating that the China Insurance Research Institute has been "recharged"?

What's even more bizarre is that just when everyone was talking, the official website of the China Insurance Research Institute suddenly withdrew the crash test results of Haoying, and issued a statement on June 20, claiming that the previously released crash test results of Haoying were stolen, and they do not bear legal responsibility for this result, and the official test results will be announced at a later date after verification.

And this wait, that is, more than two months, people gradually understood in this rather bloody plot, it turned out that Zhongbaoyan was hit by Haoying on the waist.