So many mobile phone manufacturers do lens certification, why is only Huawei successful?

Huawei's Leica camera is a big highlight, and this gimmick successfully pushed the Mate 20 Pro to the 6,000 yuan price level. On the other hand, although Xiaomi Meizu OV's photo strength is acceptable, it just lacks an impressive feeling, and they have always used Qualcomm Snapdragon chips as a selling point, and the homogenization of products has been very serious. Certified lenses seem to be one of the best entry points for differentiation.

Certified lenses do not mean that they can be done simply by giving money, they must have a certain strength to be recognized by lens manufacturers, and they must comply with other people's manufacturing standards, Leica Zeiss certified lenses are not designed and produced by their companies, but are manufactured by other manufacturers, and after designing the samples, they are sent to the lens manufacturers for standard testing, and some places that do not meet the standards are modified, and the final qualified lens will be marked with its logo to prove that the lens meets the manufacturer's standards, otherwise what should you do if you make its reputation stink?

Certifying mobile phone lenses often requires a long-term partnership with the camera brand, and the technical investment is often higher. Generally, as long as the mobile phone lens gets the hardware, it will be equipped with the corresponding software, and the investment is not as much as the certified lens. According to data from foreign institutions, the cost of certified mobile phone lenses is more than 80% more expensive than general lenses, and it is necessary to set up a professional camera department, and constantly adjust the parameters with partners, the cost of R&D personnel has increased significantly, and the risk of failure is too great.

Certified lenses don't mean that you can do it just by giving money.

Building a good certified camera is certainly a big selling point, but the risk of failure cannot be ignored. A living example of this is the Carl Zeiss certified lens from Nokia, which is no longer recognized. And because the cost of the lens was too high at that time, it was difficult to drive the performance of the mobile phone chip, which led to the sales of flagship phones.

Moreover, for the general second-tier mobile phone factory, the profit is not high, and it is easy to fall into a loss dilemma if you get a certified lens.

Most domestic mobile phones, such as Xiaomi, Meizu OV, are using Sony's custom lenses. A few months ago, Sony released the new IMX586 image sensor, which has only 48 million pixels in size. Some industry insiders said that in fact, Sony does not want everyone to do certified mobile phone lenses, because this will reduce Sony's brand presence.

Because Sony has mastered the strongest camera sensor technology, the general second-tier mobile phone manufacturers are actually afraid that Sony will not be happy: once the supply of parts is cut off, I am afraid that their flagship mobile phones will not be able to be built.

It may be that Huawei's technology is more advanced, and the investment is quite large.

Leica tri-camera system with a large photosensitive area.

Starting with last year's P20 series, Huawei has launched the Leica Triple Camera System with high pixels and a large photosensitive area, also to bring users a better shooting experience. Although it also uses a large image sensor, Huawei did not choose an aggressive 1-inch size, but very sensibly used a 1-inch sensor in the main camera. This not only makes a leap forward in the quality of mobile phone shooting, but also meets the requirements of today's smartphones for lightweight and portable.

Compared with other domestic mobile phones, Huawei mobile phones can sell better mobile phone quality.

The purpose of the Leica triple camera system with its large photosensitive area is also to bring users a better shooting experience.

Because its technology is good enough, its own investment is also large.

Because Huawei's technology is more advanced and mature.

Because Huawei's technology is more advanced, the photos are clearer.

Because Huawei's enterprise strength is strong and its products are advanced.

Why is Huawei called patriotic? First, the chip of Huawei's mobile phone is a chip independently developed by China. Second, Huawei's phones are priced more than 1,000 yuan higher in other countries than in China. Those who can afford Huawei in foreign countries are local tyrants.

You can't say that.

Huawei is more proud of the country.

It has a certain say in the formulation of international rules.

So it's normal to be appreciated.

Is it patriotic to buy a Huawei phone? Who prescribes?

Huawei chips are so powerful, why don't you sell them to other friends? In fact, the reality is too cruel.

If it's a Huawei phone, bai is under the "Tuning du test" option, and we will find a "yang dao."

Light-based readability to lift the in-rise option", we will turn it on. Then the general mobile phone can turn on the "automatic brightness adjustment" function, which will make the mobile phone read relatively calmly in the sun, or you can choose a protective film with good material and good light transmission. If you can't do it anymore, you can only change your phone.

The sunlight is inherently strong, and if you look at your phone under the sun, you have to adjust it to the maximum brightness.

Playing with a mobile phone in strong light is very hurtful to the eyes, because the brightness of the mobile phone itself is limited, and it is too different from the sun.

There are many daos, so in the too-version.

This is not a problem of mobile phone merchants, but the technical requirements do not allow the brightness of the mobile phone to be too high, which will cause certain harm to the human body, and it is recommended that you should try to avoid using the mobile phone in strong light.

1. Why not use Huawei's HiSilicon Kirin chip? 2. Why not use Samsung's chips? 3. Why are they using Qualcomm chips?

Before 5G technology, Qualcomm almost monopolized the communication baseband, and has always been the big brother in this part of technology, which has many advantages for other chip companies, and the products are also very competitive. Qualcomm's production capacity is very strong in many cases, and it can supply very right chips to the outside world, so it is a very rational choice for major mobile phone manufacturers who do not have the strength to develop chips to buy Qualcomm chips.

Because Qualcomm's chips are much better than Kirin, the low-end production capacity is sufficient, and it can meet the needs of most people, so I like to use Qualcomm chips instead of Huawei and Samsung chips.

Because Qualcomm is an open chip manufacturer, while Huawei and Samsung are both developing chips for themselves and not for other manufacturers.

Domestic mobile phone manufacturers like to use Qualcomm's chips, rather than Huawei and Samsung chips, because Qualcomm's chips are cheap and cost-effective, so everyone loves to use them.

That's because Qualcomm chips have a relatively large advantage in this field, although Huawei and Samsung's chips also belong to the top level, but they are still not as good as Qualcomm chips, mobile phone manufacturers in order to reduce the risk of use, of course, will choose the safest, safest chip.

Qualcomm has always been relatively stable and the quality is very reliable, while Huawei and Samsung, their chips are actually slightly worse, so naturally they don't like to use them very much.

Because Huawei chips and Samsung chips are not external, they are all mobile phone manufacturers, and they will not give their core technology to others.

Nonsense, I like to use MediaTek.

The world's three major mobile phone brands do have their own chips, Apple's A-series processors, Samsung's Orion processors, and Huawei's Kirin processors.

There is a misunderstanding of logical thinking here, the world's three major mobile phone brands are not strong because of processor chips, but because they are strong before the research and development of chips, and the logical order before and after cannot be confused. Self-developed processor chips can indeed enhance the brand image of mobile phones and promote the healthy development of mobile phone manufacturers to a certain extent. However, blindly carrying out chip research and development is likely to be a devastating blow to mobile phone companies that are just starting out.

The research and development of mobile phone chips is not as simple as we imagined, involving manpower, material resources, financial resources and other aspects.

Whether it is Apple, Samsung or Huawei, the current framework for mobile phone chip research and development uses the armv8 framework. Not long ago, the United States added Huawei to the "entity list", and Arm announced the severance of cooperative relations with Huawei. Fortunately, Huawei and ARM have signed a lifetime license to use ARMv8, and even if the cooperation is interrupted, Huawei can still use the framework, and can develop and upgrade on the basis of the framework.

The ARM framework has the characteristics of high performance and low power consumption, which is very suitable for mobile processor chips. So, that is to say, Apple, Samsung, and Huawei all have to buy the right to use the framework through Arm. After being authorized by ARM, Apple, Samsung, and Huawei can be used for R&D and production, and the processor chips that have been packaged.

Apple, Samsung, we don't discuss too much, the company's strength is obvious to all, and the self-developed processor chip is easy to understand. Let's mainly talk about domestic mobile phone manufacturers.

Domestic mobile phone manufacturers are not only Huawei who has developed processor chips, but also Xiaomi's surging processors. Xiaomi has also entered the world's top 500 companies this year, but it has not been smooth in terms of chip research and development. The surging S1 is a short-lived chip, which is only used in Xiaomi's own low-end products, and has the defect of severe heating and frequent crashes.

Xiaomi surging S2 has been in a difficult birth, and Xiaomi officials have not given accurate news. It is so difficult for a Fortune 500 company, let alone other companies, no wonder Lenovo has been reluctant to enter the bottomless field of chips.

At present, Huawei is the only company in China that uses self-developed Kirin processor chips, which is also achieved by relying on Huawei's strong R&D strength and high cost investment.

Therefore, it is not the chip that is strong, after all, Apple, Huawei, and Samsung did not have or had too bad chips at the earliest. It's a chip that is only owned when it's strong, and it's a positive correlation.

Because they want to get to market faster. In this way, the odds are greater.

Because the processor chip is a very important component.

In fact, the processor's chip is what determines the maximum performance of a mobile phone.

Because now it's time to battle it out on the processor chips.

Because they want to be the first to develop this chip.

Only with developed processors can we monopolize the mobile phone industry and have a dominant power.

Because the chip is their core part, without this thing, the mobile phone will be useless.

Because in this way, we can occupy the market more quickly.

Because they don't want to be limited by other companies.

Huawei's Hongmeng system is still shocked by the industry as soon as it comes out, although there is various news this year that Huawei is subject to regulatory restrictions abroadBut Huawei's consistent personality is that if you don't give me a chip, I'll do it myself, and if you don't cooperate with me, I'll find someone else, and the baby is not afraid at all! So it is not surprising that Huawei's HarmonyOS system is about to succeed, the focus is on so many Android mobile phone brands in China, who will Huawei cooperate with.

At present, there is news that the test results of Huawei's Hongmeng system have been released, and smartphones using Huawei's Hongmeng system run half faster than the Android operating system.

Personally, I think judging by the previous newsThe relationship between 360 and Huawei has always been good, and Xiaomi has also expressed friendship with Huawei's system, which are well-known domestic enterprises. In order for Huawei's HarmonyOS system to be the first shot, it must cooperate with developers with a wide audience and can be recognized by customers, so that Huawei can ensure the quality of the first batch of mobile phones with self-developed systems.

Some people say that Apple will cooperate with Huawei? I don't think it's likely, after all, Apple has always been cynical about Huawei's 5G planning and autonomous system, and is not optimistic. The United States is still not allowing Huawei to enter the mainstream market, and has been encouraging other countries to boycott Huawei, which is also very speechless.

We hope to work with manufacturers around the world to show them how powerful our iris system is.

It is estimated that in addition to the Apple system, other manufacturers will cooperate.

That mobile phone manufacturer should be very considerate, depending on Huawei.

This is not necessarily, I believe that Huawei's HarmonyOS system must be very strong.

Huawei Hongmeng system test, and major domestic mobile phone manufacturers are likely to cooperate. Let's see how the negotiation went.

It is not known yet, but there is definitely Xiaomi. After all, both of them are very good in the domestic machine,

I can't guess this, it still depends on how Huawei decides.

I think we will cooperate with manufacturers such as Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo.

It is not yet known which one he will work with, but I think it is possible for Huawei Xiaomi.

You're right, Huawei is too strong, it's difficult.

Huawei is still busy with chip problems, how can it be able to help others.

This thing also needs to look at the ability, not to say that it's okay to talk like you, we have to know that Huawei's main industry is communication, and the mobile phone itself is not the main **, and such an important thing as a chip, Huawei is just able to satisfy itself, how can it have the ability to provide it to others, it doesn't want other chip manufacturers to simply make chips, he also needs to do other things and products, so he has no ability to produce more chips, how to sell them to others.

The creation of chips is not Huawei's specialty, but companies like SMIC, Qualcomm, MediaTek, and TSMC can solve the problem of chips, but unfortunately the domestic SMIC can only mass-produce 14nm chips now, and 7nm chips are still being conquered, which will take time to wait to be solved.