I want to sue China Telecom Monopoly legal people come in and help .

This thing seems to be a bit far from monopoly

If your contract with China Telecom has been terminated, then Telecom will be unjust enrichment for receiving your money, and the bank should be jointly and severally liable for your losses if it cannot prove that it is not at fault.

So the key is whether the contract has been terminated, usually this kind of telecommunications service needs to sign a written, provided by the telecommunications provider of the form of the contract, the termination (such as disassembly) also needs the same procedure, so you need to carefully find out whether there is something similar, otherwise there can only be indirect evidence to prove, such as the refund and deposit refund list, but if the telecom does not recognize, it can only be determined by the court.

It's useless for you to sue Telecom, such a big company, with a huge legal counsel group, how can you fight him...

And your so-called termination of the contract, did you go to the business hall to handle the cancellation of the account? If you don't close your account, he will definitely continue to deduct money.

I suggest that you go to the business hall first to check whether you have handled the account cancellation business, if not, close the account first, and then ask them to return the money.

Don't think about it when you go to court...

This is a telecommunications contract dispute that can be litigated in advance;

Monopoly is a public interest lawsuit, and it is not your turn yet;

Monopolistic behavior is regulated by a special anti-monopoly agency.

This is a telecommunications contract dispute that can be litigated in advance;

I can tell you that it's useless

Anti-monopoly has no say in administrative monopolies

That is, nationalized things.

The top 10 of China's top 500 companies are all monopoly industries

Do you think we're in the EU?

Don't sue, you can't win. State-owned enterprises are ATMs for leaders, do you say they can smash their own money bags?

Let's see if there's nothing you want to post.

1.Since the formation of natural monopoly is not mainly driven by administrative power, it can also be said that natural monopoly is a special form of economic monopoly. Therefore, there is a monopoly in telecommunications companies.

2.China's telecommunications industry is divided between several major operators, mainly China Unicom, China Mobile, and China Telecom. These large companies are all state-owned enterprises, and there is no private capital or foreign capital among them, and in a nutshell, China's telecommunications industry is in an oligopoly situation where a few big companies control the entire market.

Natural monopoly arises when a product or service is provided by one manufacturer at a lower cost than that provided by multiple factories, and China's electric power, telecommunications, railways, gas supply and other industries are all natural monopoly industries.

There is no monopoly in telecommunications, isn't there competition from Netcom, Mobile, and other new units?

Most people don't know that in the Internet private line access market, in fact, in addition to China Telecom and China Unicom, there are several other Internet backbone network business units, including China Mobile (Weibo), China Tietong, China Education and Scientific Research Computer Network Network Center, China Science and Technology Network Center, China International Electronic Commerce Center, etc. In addition, there are many value-added telecom companies that have been subleased, such as China Telecom, Great Wall Broadband, Gehua, etc. Therefore, this market is not at all imagined, only China Telecom and China Unicom dominate the world, due to the existence of many network providers, the fierce competition for customers can be described as white-hot, and the market competition is extremely fierce.

However, no ministry or agency has released data on the revenue of the private line access market, so there is no data support for the proportion of telecom and China Unicom in it. Therefore, the so-called monopoly theory has nowhere to stand. As for the difference in the bandwidth of renting to SP mentioned in the CCTV report, for example, the same commercial house owned by a real estate developer is also 100 square meters, and the difference between Beijing and Shanghai is 400,000!

Strange? Of course not! Because it is easy for the public to understand, it is normal to have ** differences due to the different real estate positioning, location, community facilities, and even transaction time of commercial housing.

Telecom operators are also the same for SP rental bandwidth, due to the difference in transaction conditions (regional factors, time factors, product details, customer requirements, service quality, etc.), the rental bandwidth is also regulated by the market. What is a monopoly?

Monopoly or non-monopoly is not clear to the common people, but they only know that China's telecommunications tariffs are much, much more expensive than most countries in the world.

In 2007, the Ministry of Information Industry of the People's Republic of China and the Ministry of Construction jointly issued the Notice on Further Regulating the Construction of Communication Pipelines and Communication Facilities in Residential Quarters and Commercial and Residential Buildings, which clearly stipulates that real estate development enterprises and project managers shall not sign monopoly agreements with telecommunications operators for the access and use of communication facilities such as communication pipelines in residential quarters and commercial and residential buildings, shall not restrict the access and use of other telecommunications operators in any way, and shall not restrict the right of users to freely choose telecommunications services. Buyers have the right to know in accordance with the law at the time of purchase, and the real estate developer should bear the obligation to inform in this regard, if the developer and the network operator clearly infringe on the owner's right to choose and know, the resident can directly sue the court after the evidence is conclusive.

According to the above provisions, the monopoly agreement you are talking about is illegal, and you can enter the network facilities without the use of telecommunications. If the property and other units in the community obstruct it, you can protect your rights and interests in accordance with the law by suing or other means.

Hello: You can enter the complex.

According to Article 13 of the Anti-Monopoly Law, business operators with competitive relationships are prohibited from entering into the following monopoly agreements:

1) Fix or change the goods**;

2) Restricting the quantity of goods produced or sold;

3) Segmentation of the sales market or raw material procurement market;

4) Restricting the purchase of new technologies or equipment, or restricting the development of new technologies or products;

5) Boycott of transactions;

6) Other monopoly agreements identified by anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies.

"Monopoly agreement" as used in this Law refers to an agreement, decision, or other concerted act that excludes or restricts competition.

Article 14 Business operators are prohibited from entering into the following monopoly agreements with their trading counterparts:

1) Fixed resale of goods to a third party**;

2) Limit the minimum amount of goods to be resold to third parties**;

3) Other monopoly agreements identified by anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies.

Zhejiang lawyer Sun:

Regardless of the facts of the case, as far as you asked, the loss caused by the inability to reissue the mobile phone card is not a direct loss.

Litigation claim: China Telecom Baita Store will reissue a mobile phone card, compensate 1 yuan for mental losses, and pay a number of transportation expenses.

Defendant: China Telecom Baita Store.

Litigation fee: 50 yuan.

Accept your fate, hire a lawyer for 5000, and think about whether it's worth it first.

Characteristics of Market Economy This question assesses students' reasoning ability through the current situation of the telecommunications industry. The market economy has the characteristics of competition, and for this reason, it is necessary to break the monopoly, which restricts competition and is not conducive to the telecommunications industry to improve economic efficiency by relying on scientific and technological progress and reducing costs, thereby affecting its healthy development. Monopoly often produces **, which is not conducive to improving the quality of service, and **high will affect the increase of actual market demand, a, b, and d are all wrong. Answer: c

I am just an ordinary person in China, and the monopoly of telecommunications has caused me a lot of losses.

I have a package of 100 yuan a month**, which can be used for 100 hours.

I pay for one month, just for one month. I didn't pay this month because I wasn't going to go online this month.

But Telecom, 100 yuan was deducted from my card!!

Guess how it was deducted? I didn't have a penny on my card, and Telecom deducted my card to -100 yuan, and I owed 100 yuan.

The problem is that 100 yuan deducted my Internet access this month dial, which shows arrears and cannot access the Internet. (I can't dial up this month, and I can't enjoy the function of surfing the Internet, why do you want to deduct 100 yuan from me, and curse these "telecom overlord regulations" to make them, and they can't die well).

His mother's telecommunications bullshit is a monopoly that has earned the hard-earned money of many ordinary people in China.

Because of radio and television. Think for yourself.

China Telecom's monopoly operation has long been a public fact, but if you force you to consume, your behavior violates the "Consumer Rights Protection Law", you can complain to the local industrial and commercial department, or file a lawsuit in the people's court in accordance with the law.

Consumers have the right to independently choose the business operators that provide goods or services, to choose the types of goods or services, to decide whether to buy or not to buy any kind of goods, and to accept or not to accept any kind of services.

Consumers have the right to compare, identify and select goods or services when they choose goods or services independently.

Article 34: Where disputes over consumer rights and interests arise between consumers and proprietors, they may be resolved through the following channels:

1) Negotiate a settlement with the operator;

2) Request mediation by a consumer association;

3) Appeal to the relevant administrative department;

4) Submit to an arbitration institution for arbitration in accordance with the arbitration agreement reached with the operator;

5) Initiating litigation in the people's courts.

1. There is a special agency within the telecommunications department called 180 before, which is responsible for business complaints and the management of business personnel in this department. b. Claim compensation for your losses, (the work carried out by the business personnel represents their departments, because the work of their business personnel is not responsible, and the losses caused to you should be compensated by the telecommunications department first, and there are relevant regulations within the telecommunications department); In addition to the loss given to you by the business, the loss also includes your rights protection costs. c. Request to re-handle the business you need to handle as soon as possible.

Before handling the business, ask them to introduce the various businesses clearly, so that you can choose).

3. If the results of the above methods are not satisfactory to you, you can also file a lawsuit with the people's court.

4. The Ministry of Information Industry has accepted complaints about telecommunications disputes, and you can also make complaints through the **, and the resolution rate is very high.

5. Another way, ask for help, and dare to be interested in such complaints, and the "bullish" public enterprises will deal with him in this way.

The key is to see how people bully you, if it is defrauded or other, then you can go to the Consumer Protection Association to complain, or call 12315 to protect your rights, as long as you receive infringement, then the sales association can deal with it. Don't be afraid of big faces, big temples need fireworks from the people to prosper. I wish you success in defending your rights.

In the face of the choice and shortcomings of monopolizing China's telecommunications industry From "one monopoly" to "four-legged dominance," the development of China's telecommunications industry is a process in which large enterprises are spun off into a number of small enterprises. This broke the monopoly of one family, and the success of the reform was beyond doubt. The telecommunications industry has initially formed a competitive landscape.

In 1993, China Telecom was established, announcing the separation of government and enterprises; In 1999, the original China Telecom was "divided into four", China Telecom and China Mobile respectively monopolized the fixed line and mobile ** business, although its monopoly position has not changed, but due to the substantial increase in the competitiveness of China Unicom, China Mobile's monopoly position has been significantly weakened; In 2002, China Telecom and China Netcom were able to conduct business in each other's business fields, which laid the groundwork for future competition. From the previous reforms to the subsequent spin-offs, the state has been gradually breaking the monopoly of the telecommunications industry and trying to introduce competition, and in fact it has achieved this effect. The efficiency of enterprises in the telecommunications industry has improved.

After the spin-off and reorganization of the telecommunications industry, the monopoly pattern was broken, and the pressure from the market led to various telecommunications companies to increase the productivity of labor and credit services, improve service quality, and adjust tariff levels. Taking the fixed average new installation time as an example, it used to take a few months or even a year to install a new one, but from 2004, the average time limit for China Telecom's installation was 4 days in cities and 5 days in rural areas, which was basically close to the average level of developed countries. The efficiency of enterprises has improved, and it is consumers who ultimately benefit from Huazhou.