Is the evil of a child ignorant or intentional?

Hello landlord, if it is a child under the age of five, the child is still in the invincible stage at this time. For them, the rules are not binding, so at this time if the child does something bad. It is possible to be ignorance.

If throwing it away after this age is doing bad things, then he should be able to distinguish some things from wrong at this time. If this is still the case, then it is intentional.

A thousand children are a thousand kinds, and the specific situation is analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

Some children, because they do not get the attention of their parents, often do bad things, make mistakes, and even get sick to win their parents' love for them.

Some children are pampered and spoiled too much, causing them to cry, make mistakes, and deliberately do bad things once their requirements are not met.

There are also children, in view of the improper discipline of their parents and the dereliction of education, do not know what is right and wrong, so that they do some bad things without knowing it.

I have always believed that the fault of a child who is not good to outsiders is not him, but his parents.

There are no children who are not, only parents who are not.

Children's evil, belongs to ignorance, human nature is good, due to the acquired environment, human factors, to the children of the wrong guidance, resulting in a change in the child's concept, after the transformation of the children, if not correct the mistakes, continue the wrong practice, then it is intentional.

Some of the evils of children are due to ignorance, and some are done intentionally.

Because some children may be born with parents who lack education and don't know what the consequences of what they do.

And some children are very young and sensible, but they are more vicious. Because the genes that each child carries at birth are different, it may be affected by the genetics of the previous generation and the environment in which he was raised.

Human beings are inherently good. Outwardly the evil of a child is ignorant. But in fact, this is the concrete embodiment of the problem of parental guardianship, education, and parental doting. Born in the lap of luxury. It is the root of children's evil.

Many times, we always use the plasticity of teenagers to make individual criminals not get the punishment they deserve, as if they can't easily deprive them of their rights for a lifetime just because they are young.

And what about the victims? They didn't do anything wrong, and they were destroyed by monsters, who should be responsible?

The goodness of an adult is a complex good, he knows what is good and what is bad, and he also knows what is right and what is wrong, even if he is insidious and cunning, and does a lot of evil, he still understands that he has done a wrong thing, and under the influence of more external factors, he will regret it, he will feel guilty, and he will want to atone for his mistakes.

But a child's evil is pure evil, before the three views are formed, before there is no concept of right and wrong, he just follows his instincts, and he doesn't even realize that killing people and setting fires is a wrong thing.

Children's evil is ignorance, not deliberately messing with and destroying, children are small, right and wrong of some things have not been established, they want to do what they want to do, at this time parents must play a role in guidance and education, otherwise over time they will form a habit, and when they grow up, they will be thought to be intentional.

Whether the evil of children is ignorant or intentional, children should be ignorant when they are hungry, because they cannot do something intentionally. If a child shows himself in the form of evil, then this child is already a genius, absolutely, and now he has a thinking brain at a very young age, so what will he be like when he grows up, so it is said that children are hungry and ignorant, not intentionally, someone does something for it, only when he is hungry he wants to eat, and the rest is material.

A child's evil is also ignorant and intentional, and a child who is too young may have done it unintentionally and felt curious, so she did evil, but if an older child does evil, it may be intentional, and he has learned something on the TV network and has done evil.

I believe in Xunzi's view that sex is inherently evil, and people are born as villains!

Food, lust, joy and anger, likes and dislikes, lust and so on are all natures, whether it is a gentleman or a villain, they are born with this character. As for etiquette and benevolence, they are all acquired and learned. Therefore, children's evil is caused by nature, they just follow their nature, and their views of right and wrong, good and evil are not yet perfect, and they cannot distinguish between right and wrong.

I very much agree with Xunzi's point of view, etiquette and benevolence are taught by the day after tomorrow.

The evil of a child is ignorance, not intentionality. Children's speech and behavior, parenting are affected by the family environment, such as parents' behavior, children will imitate, so parents are the first teachers of children, and their own speech and behavior determine the child's life.

The evil of children is ignorance, and they cannot distinguish between likes and dislikes, and it is up to us adults to guide them correctly. A child is born like a blank sheet of paper, to see what ideas we instill in him.

The evil of a child is unintentional. Most people find it fun to do this or imitate something.

As long as we parents and teachers guide them correctly, it's fine.

First of all, let's not advocate this kind of evil behavior. It is necessary to stop and guide in time, or it will cause great trouble if it is not a habit in the future. I influence a child's life.

A child's malice is basically ignorance. Innocence and purity are in his nature. Basically, he lived in a little bit of bad things, but he didn't realize that he was doing bad things at all.

Therefore, we must educate our children in a targeted way. Let the children distinguish between right and wrong. In this way, there will be no bad things happening.

At the beginning of a person, his nature is good, which means that people are born to be good, and the parents of small evils must correct them, and they will not be evil, so they must be strictly educated. Children are ignorant and adults are responsible.

In fact, children have their own thoughts, whether they are ignorant or intentional depends on themselves, and it depends on how old the child is, this is not certain. Intentionally possible.

Children are ignorant of ignorance, and they don't know what the consequences of such behavior will be.

Therefore, as parents of children, we should educate our children from an early age, telling them what they can do, what they can't do, and why they can't do it.

The wickedness of a child is ignorance. Not intentionally. Everyone is born a blank, all accumulated little by little, some have accumulated good things, and some have singular bad things, because people's birth is really a blank.

It's good to learn well, and it's bad to learn badly. Be sure to think about your children and educate them to learn well and do well. Be an idealistic, promising, and moral one.

A man is only a man who suffers more than one who sits on one.

thinks that the evil things of children, the so-called intentional so-called human nature is inherently good, and he is born with good nature, probably because of the child's acquired environment, acquired factors, so I think this acquired influence is related, he may have done it intentionally.

Most of them are intentional, because they must have a certain amount of judgment when they reach a certain age, and at this time it must be caused by their own growth environment factors, so many thirteen or fourteen-year-old children become very quick for this reason.

The evil of children is originally young and ignorant. Children are in the growth stage, thinking is simple, there is not so much complexity, parents should guide their children correctly.

The evil of a child is ignorant. In the three-character scripture, it is said that the original nature of human beings is good. No one is born bad.

Many of them are forced or caused by the environment. This time, the bus driver in Anshun, Guizhou Province, was retaliated against the society due to social injustice. Without water, there is a natural willingness to be a bad person.

Who wouldn't? The years are quiet, and the life is stable. But when reality doesn't meet his requirements, he may take extreme measures to achieve his goals.

Most of the evil of children is formed by the influence of the ears and eyes, or the influence of parents, or the environment, so the evil of children should be intentional.

Human nature is inherently evil. The root of evil is selfishness, living beings are selfish and greedy, selfishness is manifested as evil in order to survive, and children will take good food and fun for themselves from birth. If someone goes to take him, he will scold you and even beat you, which is the nature of selfishness brought by birth, which will be manifested as evil, and as he grows up, he will go to society and contact people and things will become more and more vicious.

Human performance is vicious to the point that there is no bottom line. People can do all kinds of evil in the face of profit and money. It can hurt anyone or even kill, family and friendship are more than a penny in front of money, people are immoral and inhumane for money, this is the nature of the existence of living beings, animals can kill their own kind for food.

You give money to animals, animals definitely don't. It can't be eaten, and in the same way: humans can kill their own kind for profit.

Even the viciousness of relatives has no bottom line, and there is as much poison as it wants, so human nature is evil, not human nature is inherently good

The evil of a child is because he is ignorant, and the goodness of man's original nature can actually be changed to evil, and only after education and education can he know what is morality and what is good.

If children are not sensible and just naughty, they need to be guided correctly and timely by their parents, which is called youth and ignorance. If it is repeated and the quality is bad, it is intentional and needs to be criticized and punished.

If a child does something wrong, if he doesn't understand it, he is ignorant, and if he understands it, he will commit evil again, that is intentional.

Is ignorance evil? First of all, let's look at what your definition of "evil" is, I personally think that it is okay for you to call ignorance ignorance, but if you use "evil" to cover it up, it will be a partial generalization! As for children, if they were ignorant, there would be no concept of "good" and "evil".

Whoever says it, it's a philosophically correct explanation!

The simple understanding is that you either don't really know, or you do it on purpose.

Ignorance is sin, a famous saying left by the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates.

There are two flowers, one on each branch.

As the name suggests, ignorance means not knowing, not understanding, not being clear. Its specific manifestations are: truth and falsehood do not distinguish between good and evil, do not distinguish between right and wrong; Know but don't know; take it for granted behind closed doors, and take falsehood as truth; Credulous and blindly obedient, unusually interested in hearsay and strange rumors that are unreasonable, picking up people's teeth and wisdom to spread false rumors, and easily accepting deceitful foolish propaganda.

Broadly speaking, harming others and oneself (including tangible and intangible harm) is evil, and in a narrow sense, evil is causing tangible damage to the interests of others.

Ignorance is not very lethal if it does not act on others. In this sense, the greatest evil of ignorance is to harm others, and ignorant people often use falsehood as the truth to preach it, and in this way, intentionally or unintentionally, suppress and resist the truth. A more ignorant person is a blind man riding a blind horse, and it is easy to accept the ignorant and ignorant preaching, and to enjoy it with pleasure.

In the picture, the philosopher Socrates who points to the heavens would rather be a miserable person than a happy pig).

Anonymous once said a famous saying, a good drum will sound as soon as it is played, and a good light will be turned on as soon as it is pulled out. This sentence seems simple, but the gloom in it can't help but make people think deeply. Now, it is very, very important to address the problem of the understanding that ignorance is sin.

So, and these are not entirely important, the more important question is, in summary, ignorance is the understanding of sin, what happens when it happens, and what happens if it doesn't. So, then, understanding what kind of existence ignorance is the understanding of sin is the key to solving all problems. It is necessary to think clearly about what kind of existence it is to understand ignorance as sin.

Yet, even so, the emergence of the understanding that ignorance is sin still represents a certain significance. We all know that as long as it makes sense, then it has to be carefully considered. In this case, this fact is of great significance to me, and I believe that it also has a certain significance to the world.

That being the case, with these questions in mind, let's examine the understanding that ignorance is sin. It is necessary to think clearly about what kind of existence it is to understand ignorance as sin. I hope that everyone will have a discussion in the spirit of knowing everything, saying everything, saying that those who say are not guilty, and those who hear are full of caution.

From this point of view, I think that Rousseau famously said that the value of life is determined by oneself. With this in mind, we need to look at this issue more carefully: we all know that as long as it makes sense, then it must be carefully considered.

In this way, if the understanding of ignorance as sin arises in life, we have to consider the fact that it has appeared. From this point of view, and these are not entirely important, the more important question is that we generally think that if we get to the crux of the problem, everything else will be solved. We need to unify our thinking, unify our steps, and work toward a fundamental solution to the understanding that ignorance is sin.

Understanding what kind of existence ignorance is the understanding of sin is the key to solving all problems. For me personally, then, the understanding that ignorance is sin is not just a major event, it may change my life. Yet, even so, the emergence of the understanding that ignorance is sin still represents a certain significance.

Then, the understanding of the so-called ignorance as sin is the key to how the understanding of ignorance as sin needs to be written. Personally, the understanding that ignorance is sin means a lot to me. The understanding that ignorance is sin may seem like a coincidence, but if we look at it from a larger perspective, it seems to be an inevitable fact.

After the above discussion, we have to face a very embarrassing fact, that is, in life, if the understanding of ignorance as sin arises, we have to consider the fact that it appears. I have also thought about this issue carefully and have been thinking about it day and night.