Please help me do the math, 18 55 or 18 200

I've included a little bit of a comparison between 18-55 and A14 in this post, you can take a look.

It should be noted that there are already many versions of 18-55. From the earliest nothing, to the later IS, then there is the second generation, and now there is STM. The picture quality is getting better and better.,Of course, it's still incomparable with 17-55.,There's also a gap with 15-85.,But after all**There's a place there.。

Landscape photography is one of the most serious branches of photography, and it has high requirements for the imaging and color of the lens, so I don't know how far you want to be for the scenery. (But with your budget, there shouldn't be much you can do...)

However, one thing is clear,Don't use the filter,The image quality is average,**The filter is more affected,Especially the wide-angle end,Affected by the filter greatly。

I mainly use 17-55 now, which is enough in the city, and in the wild, it will only be too widespread. So, the telephoto end is really not very needed, unless your creation is more in some wild places of interest and needs to be framed from a distance, otherwise, converted to C frame, the focal length close to 90 is really enough.

As for the lens, my impression is that you will always feel that your lens is not sharp enough, that the aperture is not big enough, that the color is not smooth enough, and that the bokeh is not oily enough, so there is no end to this road... Two options, buy the most acceptable one, and then concentrate on using it well. The other is to buy the cheapest one, which can be used first, and it is not a pity to change it later if you have money.

To sum up, I don't think A14 is necessary. As for choosing between the many 18-55, I think, either 18-55stm, or get the cheapest second-hand, which can be used. The rest will come later.

Of course, there is another option, which is to simply not use a DSLR, because the lens used cannot show the advantages of SLR anyway, so simply replace it with some high-end cards, such as LX5, 7 and the like. Due to the difference in resolution and the difference in format, in the case of excellent lighting conditions, the output of cards and pullover SLRs is almost equal, and even counterattacks often occur.

Or the 18-55 lens is cost-effective, the imaging quality is also good, recommend this, although the 18-200 is cheap, but the effect is not good, buy the 18-55 practice technique first, over-the-top, slowly save money to buy a better one.

I don't talk to you about the data, I talk to you about the actual feelings.

The 18-135 and 55-200 are a little better than the 18-200 but the 55-200 is a telephoto, and the 18-135 that you can't hang all the time is a knockout lens, and Nikon is not produced anymore.

So the better choice is 18-70 or 18-105, which is better than the previous ones, of course, it is better to have money on 16-85.

Actually, saturation is not very important... In the later stage, you can adjust it at will without spending money.

As far as the 3 heads you are talking about, it must be 135!

For these three heads, I recommend 18-135, the focal length is sufficient, and the imaging is good.

First of all, the zoom factor is for the zoom lens, not for the camera, unless your camera can't change lenses. The so-called zoom factor is the value of the maximum focal length of a zoom lens divided by the minimum focal length. For example, if one of your lenses is 18-55mm, then its zoom factor is 55 18, which is roughly equal to 3x.

After the installation on the D40, it is 27mm and 27mm respectively.

It's as simple as dividing the following number by the previous number to get an approximation. Yes, that's right.

The former is suitable for landscapes and close-up portraits, while the latter shoots long shots.

18-55 You should have a set of digital cameras! Your camera should not be full-frame, so the lens of your camera should be 18-55 on the basis of this focal length is enough for taking pictures in daily life, and this focal length is used for portraits, flowers or close-ups such as long-distance photography.

As long as I like,,Shoot anything,,I can shoot portraits with a wide angle of 12,I can also shoot landscapes with a telephoto of 400.。。 Unconventional things are more likely to highlight the theme and personal ideas as long as they are well controlled,,, but if you want to shoot birds or wild animals, it is not good to shoot telephoto, and if you want to shoot indoor scenery, it is not good to have a wide angle

The first 18-55 18-135 18-200 is to say that the focal length is also copied.

It is the size of the optical zoom (simply put, the larger the focal length, the farther the shot).

Second, as far as the lenses are concerned, these three lenses are all set lenses, and if you don't have a box, you can only buy and disassemble the head.

Third, the comparison between lenses shows that 18-55 is the worst (the focal length is too small, the height is not too low, and the combination inside the lens has weaknesses).

18-200 moderate (that is, a more comprehensive lens, generally better for travel, from the wide angle can be extended to the telephoto end, but there is an obvious weakness, the focal length is too large, the lens combination can not be used to the best effect).

18-135 is the best (the first focal length is appropriate, the second is the inner focus lens, the third is put to the telephoto end lens does not need to be locked, it is more convenient, and the fourth is a new lens, used for 7D as a sleeve, that is, the full-frame camera can be a lens to have).

The above three lenses are relatively cheap lenses for non-high-end products 18-135 18-200 can enter the middle ranks.

If you are buying 500d or 450d it is recommended to buy.

If you buy 40D or 50D or 5D, it is recommended to buy a 24-105 lens.

The focal length is different, 18-200 is the focal length change range of the lens, the smaller the number, the greater the breadth of the shot; The higher the number, the stronger the magnification of the subject.

The focal length of the lens when zooming. The minimum focal length is 18mm, and the field of view is wide, also called wide angle. 55mm is the maximum focal length, and the field of view is small, but it can be used to the farthest distance that the lens can take.

The focal length is different.

18-55 is the zoom range between 18mm-55mm.

18-200 means that the zoom range is between 18mm-200mm.

The difference between 55 and 200 is broadly speaking, that is, the magnification is different. The zoom factor of the lens: 18-200 is 200 18, and 18-55 is 55 18

There are many parameters of the lens:

Focal length, aperture, image stabilization, ultrasonic motor, macro lens, and special lens markings.

Different focal lengths, different image quality (although albeit almost), ** different.

I'm here to ask for a score xdddd

50 is a fixed focus, suitable for shooting still life and portrait close-ups, because of the large aperture, the character is prominent, but it cannot be zoomed, so a standard zoom head w[18-55 can be

Keep the sleeve, enter the AFS35, play for more than half a year, and then consider replacing the sleeve or telephoto.

Sleeve retention, practice technique. Later, I figured it out and then went to the telephoto.

In terms of telephoto alone, it is definitely not as good as 55-250, and it is not recommended to enter 18-200, which is expensive and rotten!!

Lenses have a three-fold rule, which means that it is best not to exceed the proximal focal length at the far focal length.

Compared with these two heads, the far end is of course 55-250 is a little better.

18-200 distal too meaty.

Directly Tamron 17--50 bar.

Constant aperture of the aperture.

Don't think about the pullover.

At the farthest focal length, the aperture is blind.

Dilute pullover.

It's still 55-250, and 18-200 is not expensive. 55-250 is at least cheaper.

Imaging is the same. But 18-200 is a lot more convenient. And the two lenses are often changed very troublesomely. Of course, the image quality of the zoom lens is still very different.

Don't mislead people upstairs.

How can this be the same The difference is quite big If you don't have so many lenses, why do you want to use 18-200 wide-angle distortion or serious overheading, and the resolution at the 200mm end is worse than that of 50-200.

The advantage of the 18-200 is that it is portable, and it can go all over the world with one mirror, and that's it, and the others can't.

It's all about the same, and if you pursue portability, choose 18-200.

DX 18-55mm and DX 18-70mm

At the bottom end of this set of tests, based on the focal length range, is the Nikkor DX 18-55mm paired with the Nikon D40 DSLR. It's the cheapest lens in this comparison test, with a basic 3x optical zoom. Next up is the Nikkor DX 18-70mm, a popular sleeve that offers better quality for mid-range to high-end Nikon DSLRs, and it's the oldest of the four, but it's still a popular choice when bundled with the D80.

18-135mm and 18-200mm VR

The third lens in this comparison is the Nikkor DX 18-135mm as the standard sleeve for the D80, which is now bound to the rest of the body as well. Finally, let's take a look at the Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR, which is not actually a pullover, but has been hugely popular when many dealers bundle it with Nikon bodies, including the D80 and D200.

Obviously, each of the four lenses has a larger zoom range, and the DX 18-200mm is also embedded with a VR function to reduce machine vibration. In addition, they differ a lot in workmanship, focusing speed, and optical performance. If you're looking to upgrade your current fitter or buy a new body and lens combination, we'll test and compare their performance in this set of Nikkor lens comparisons to help you pick the best lens for your Nikon DSLR.

The camera we tested with a Nikon D80 with the default settings and the best JPGE image quality, with an SRGB color space, auto white balance, 3D matrix metering, sharpness, contrast, color, saturation, color, and high ISO noise reduction set to "normal". The serial numbers of the four lenses are DX 18-55mm: 2095691, DX 18-70mm: respectively

3599043，dx 18-135mm：2280910，dx 18-200：2666378。

From left to right, the design below is the Nikkor DX 18-55mm, DX 18-70mm, DX 18-135mm and DX 18-200mm VR, all of which have 18mm wide ends. From this graph, we can see that except for the 18-55mm lens, the other three lenses correspond to the 18mm focal length at the shortest time. Like many other 18-55mm lenses, the Nikon 18-55mm has an extended inner barrel when zooming to both the wide-angle and telephoto ends, and the corresponding focal length is around 30mm when the lens is at its shortest.

18-70 imaging is good, the materials are also very real, three pieces of ed and one aspherical, but there is no anti-shake is a bit regrettable!

The 55-200 uses an ED lens, which has better control over chromatic aberration, and although it is a low-end lens, it is enough to meet the general shooting!

Although the 18-200 lens with a large zoom magnification has not ideal imaging results, it has little impact on this lens, and all focal lengths have good performance!

The main thing is the price.

18-70 (2200) + 55-200 (1600) is 3800 yuan.

18-200 is about 5000, and it is convenient to have anti-shake when it is convenient, but it is a little more expensive!

My recommendation: If you don't have a bad money, go directly to 18-200, save the trouble of changing the lens and avoid the dust adhesion problem caused by changing the lens! The imaging results are also very good!

If the hand is a little tight, then the 18-70 + 55-200 imaging effect is comparable, that is, the 18-70 end needs your iron hand skills to be solid (don't tell me that the problem can stand, you use the silver wide angle to shake in a darker environment), and try to avoid changing the head outdoors, and pay more attention to it if you save money!

Suggestion: Go to 18-200, because these 3 heads are all entry-level heads, you will replace them, but 18-200 will be easier, and the value preservation and popularity have always been relatively high, easy to buy and easy to sell.

Very few people want it, this head is just a beginner who occasionally wants to supplement the head of the focal segment, it's very chicken, you don't want to use it after buying it for a few days, I don't recommend it.

It's a very practical focal length,This focal length doesn't need to be stabilized at all,If you can't hold this focal length,Then you still give the camera away,But after all, it's the head of the entry,The effect is not much different from the wide-angle end of 18-200,If the picture is convenient,It's still 18-200,The image quality is about the same。

Another person recommends you a head, I feel that the landlord should not want to spend too much money to buy a lens, but also want to pursue a cost-effective, I recommend you 18-105! This head is a Nikon D90 sleeve, and the image quality is very good! It is not even inferior to the head of more than 5000 yuan, and the focal length is long and very practical, and the price is not expensive about 1600, which is the king of the cost performance of Nikon's low-end lens!

Give it to me.