X10 LX5 G12 Which one is the best?

It must be LX5, Laika's vest. The x10 program is not a little slower.

G12 is the resolution of the LCD screen.

The LX5's large aperture and wide angle are useful. The Lycra version has one more Coke label to buy 7,000 yuan.

Hello landlord:

Allow me to take the liberty of saying: you choose LX5 and G12, both of which are card players, that is to say, mainly for commemorative shooting. Since it's a photo opportunity, why bother with so much (hovering between the LX5 and the G12).

Here I want to ask you: G12 is a little smaller in aperture and wide angle, have you ever used it? Do you know how this aperture and wide angle will affect your future use?

I think, you may have experienced this machine in a physical store, or visited many forums, watched others say so, and then compared it with the LX5 parameters, and suddenly found that, yes, the aperture and wide angle are a little smaller, and then this will cause trouble for you to choose the machine.

LX5 and G12,Both are half-catty and eight-tael machines,Actual shooting,The difference is not too big**,Or,The difference between them,The landlord himself may not be able to find out。 For a card machine of the same grade, don't pay too much attention to the aperture and wide angle, it's not interesting, it's purely emotional

The LX5 for personal use is very good.

Fuji X10 took a look at it, in fact, it's also good, it's the legend that you know, the program responds slowly, as for how much slower, you can try it out.

As for the Canon, it's good to shoot people a lot with bright colors, but it's definitely LX5 for shooting scenery and street photography and the like, as for why the system is different, the appearance and the like are not to mention the effect of the film, you can try it.

The two "artifacts" are both fighter jets in the card machine. G12 shape professional LX5 Lycra shape, G12 is larger than LX5 has a flip screen that is very easy to use, that one will not disappoint you. When the light is suitable, you can shoot the ** of the SLR.

I hope it helps you and secretly tells you that I am ready to buy Panasonic LX3.

Of course it's G12 I've used G9, the manual function is also very rich, the imaging is also sharp, and the Canon G series is the best among the consumer-grade digital cameras **It's also relatively high, Panasonic's LX5 is also relatively good, but it's still a notch worse than Canon G12.

Of course, choose G12, DC, except for Nikon P7000, other brand models can be ignored.

Of course, G12 is extremely easy to use. The night view is also very good. After all, Panasonic's camera still can't do Canon.

The G12 is suitable for shooting people, and the LX5 is more suitable for landscape blockbusters.

GF2 requires a lens and is not portable.

The machine is good, look at the sensor, the bigger the better.

The largest sensor in these four is GF2, followed by X10, and the other two are smaller, the same size.

In terms of handling, G12 is the best, followed by X10, followed by GF2 and LX5.

So, regardless of **, choose GF2.

The image quality is like this: D3100> GF2 J1> LX5 X10 Panasonic LX5, GF2, and Nikon J1GF2 have the strongest image quality. X10 is the brightest. If you already have more than one machine in your hands, then choose the x10.

I think G12 is good, because I'm using it, and there are no major drawbacks.

First of all, if the landlord is more in pursuit of image quality, it is recommended not to consider the Fujifilm telephoto machine The size of the sensor is small, the lens is general, and the ultra-long focal length is added to the imaging is worse than the previous ones, especially at the telephoto end, it is even worse, and it can only be used for recording.

The first three are all high-performance portable cameras, the configuration is relatively high-end, the difference is not very big, in general, Panasonic is better than Canon, mainly from the operation aspect, Canon's is better than Samsung, mainly from the noise reduction aspect.

It is recommended to choose the Panasonic LX5

It depends on what you're using it for, but if you're taking pictures while playing, I think Fujifilm's HS22 will be better.

.I'm exactly the same as you a month ago.,But I'm more tangled than you Panasonic gf2,There are many answers online.,Now I've just started g12,I especially want to answer you this question.,I just started g12,Tell you the quality has nothing to say.,I've read a lot of online review parameters or something.,I don't think it's very credible.,After all, the actual effect is king.,G12The picture quality has nothing to say.,Really。。。 I don't think even a micro mirror can be compared.,I've also considered LX5,In fact, I'm really satisfied with Canon's color reproduction,LX5I've also tried.,I feel like it's a good place to shoot the scenery.,Shoot other colors really aren't in place.,And the real machine feels too small and doesn't feel good.,The night scene must be G12 good.,As for how good it is, it's really hard to say.。

I have to recommend you to buy the G12,,I would have liked to buy it on Taobao,3600 can be taken including all the accessories。 But it's more parallel goods don't worry, the current price of the store is 3800 no accessories, if you are willing to take a certain risk appropriately, which is **, pick a good store or can save a 3,4 hundred, machine I definitely recommend you G12, not to say that LX5 is not good, because I was the same as looking at other people's evaluations and saying that G12's positioning is embarrassing or something, but the feeling of getting it is really higher than I expected in my heart. It's good that I didn't buy the Panasonic GF2....

Real personal experience, I hope it will be useful to you.

Bro, you bought DC!! No matter how large the aperture is, the DC itself has a large depth of field, and it cannot come out of the layered effect of the SLR.

For small cards, the aperture is a floating cloud, and the parameters are all floating clouds, no matter how expensive it is, it can't produce a good effect.

The smaller the number, the larger the aperture, a small card with such a large aperture, the image sensor inside is as small as a small thumb capped, it makes no sense at all, and the imaging is not good.

If it is recommended, it is directly on the single battery, the format of APS, the imaging is not a grade, ** is more than 4000.

These 2 cameras are the same, and it depends on your level.

Wide-angle portrait distortion is normal, don't use the wide-angle end, and people can eliminate distortion at a distance.

Of course, it's the Panasonic LX5GK. Panasonic's workmanship quality and video recording capabilities are recognized as the best in the industry.

There is no perfect machine for the popular flagship DC, Canon G15, Canon S110, Nikon P7700, P7100, Samsung EX2F, Sony RX100. Each has its own characteristics and its own shortcomings.

Nikon 7700 and P7100 have the most buttons and easy control, and the wide-angle 28mm maximum aperture is average (P7100 wide-angle 28mm maximum aperture.

The Sony RX100 offers the best image quality, but it's still small and portable, with a wide-angle 28mm maximum aperture.

The Fujifilm X10 has a retro look, but it has slow focusing speed and weak battery life.

Canon G15 Wide-angle 28mm, ultra-wide aperture (G12 maximum aperture), professional performance, but not portable enough.

The Canon S110 24mm ultra-wide-angle large aperture emphasizes portability.

Samsung EX2F 24mm ultra-wide-angle ultra-wide aperture.

The flagship card pursues portability, wide angle (or even ultra-wide angle), and large aperture, so I personally recommend Sony RX100 , you might as well play it first.

Flagship cards don't have as many dials. If you're happy with the rest of Oba, use it. The Canon G-series operation is just like that, and I don't feel strong. The x10 operation doesn't feel good either.

I recommend RX100 and I don't know much about the others, so I don't rate it.

G12 OK. First of all, Canon Nikon is a manufacturer specializing in the manufacture of cameras, and their cameras have been produced for a long time, and Panasonic everyone knows that there are TVs, what, what. It is produced in any field so it is not professional.

And then Canon and Nikon said that when they used to make film machines, Nikon lenses did better than Canon, and in the field of mechanical manual cameras, Nikon was a big cut ahead of Canon. But at a time when everyone is using Nikon's mechanical hand cameras, Canon has put all of its energy into electronics. It's automatic and then lays a good foundation for digital cameras.

In the current digital age, Canon's digital card machines, SLR machines, and ** cameras are ranked first in the world.

Let's talk about the model, the Canon G12 has been high since its launch and**from the launch to the present, there is almost nothing**much.

It can be said that this machine is also collectible. As for what you said about capturing, this is also abnormally good, of course, the premise is that the camera is dead and the person is alive or needs your flexible operation.

As for his performance and the performance of the other two, they have said it before, and I will not add it.

Based on these factors, I recommend you to use Canon's G12

This is the shutter speed of these three machines.

To capture well, the shutter speed must be fast.

The LX5 is the fastest at 1/4000 of a second and the slowest at 60 seconds.

The P7000 is as fast as 1/2000 and as slow as 8 seconds.

The fastest G12 is 1/4000 of a second and the slowest is 15 seconds.

I recommend you to buy the Panasonic LX5 because the Panasonic LX5 is as fast as Canon's G12 and faster than Nikon's.

Although his slowest shutter speed is the slowest of the three, it uses a Leica lens and works well.

Brother recommends you Panasonic LX5.

The key to capture is shutter speed.

The shutter has a lot to do with the aperture of the lens, the brightness of the light, the ISO setting, the maximum shutter speed of the camera, the speed of the memory card, etc. Even with a flash, it's useless, the distance is limited, and the flash is basically useless.

G12, with automatic tracking system, dual processors, fast shutter speed, and a fight with a DSLR, absolutely good, will not be false.

XZ-1 is selected for night stabilization, and the aperture has a wide range at both ends. Good light intake. Personally, Panasonic's color seems to be a little lighter.

The Canon is more average, but it seems to be a little bigger and has more buttons.

Canon's high-sensitivity image quality, Panasonic's lens shoots better colors, Canon has better handling, Panasonic looks better = = I can't say that it's perfect to buy any one, in fact, all of them are similar.

Canon G12, don't be afraid of it's big, it's really good.

Olympus is selected for image quality, and G12 is selected for control