Excuse me about the AMD chip. What is the difference between 3600 and 3800? What are the parameters

3600 main frequency of 90nm process, L2 cache 256K*2 65W

3800 main frequency of 90nm process, L2 cache 512k*2 89 65 35W

3600 main frequency of 65nm process, L2 cache 512K*2 65W

1. AMD Athlon™ X2 3800+ CPU main frequency 2GHz, external frequency 200MHz, frequency doubling 10 times, CPU architecture 64-bit, number of cores dual cores, production process 90nm, thermal design power consumption (TDP) 95W, L1 cache 64KB, L2 cache 512KB*2.

2. AMD Athlon64 X2 3600+ CPU main frequency 2GHz, external frequency 200MHz, frequency doubling 10 times, CPU architecture 64 bits, number of cores dual cores, production process 90 nm, thermal design power consumption (TDP) 65, L1 cache 128KB*2, L2 cache 256KB*2.

Compared with the performance of the two, the AMD Athlon-64 X2 3800+ CPU L2 cache is higher and has better performance, but the power consumption is also higher.

Dual-core 3800+ good point, high frequency point.

It's definitely 3800+ that's better, and their difference is in the L2 cache.

The cache for 3600+ is 256x2

The cache of 3800+ is 512x2

The main frequency is the same, so 3800+ is better!

There is not much difference In fact, the chips are all the same It is recommended to change the AMD Athlon II X2 245 (box) 375

Affiliation: AMD Athlon II X2 Series Socket Type: Socket AM3 CPU Frequency: 2900MHz Production Process: 45 nm L2 Cache: 2*1MB Number of Cores: Dual Cores.

Let's not talk about the specifics, the smaller the value, the better.

In fact, it is the heat generation, the power consumption is reduced, and the performance has not changed much.

It should be a 90 a 65

Small problem with good manufacturing process.

What I'm trying to say is that buying 4000+ is more cost-effective.

But! The single-core Athlonx 3800+ is definitely the first choice for gaming, after all, its main frequency has a very obvious advantage over gaming.

But multi-** is the strength of dual-core CPUs, which are probably about 40% or 30% stronger than single-cores.

Personally, I think that buying 4800+ is very suitable for the landlord and his** is around 890rmd, which is comparable to the Core 2E4300**. It depends on your preference, and the performance is about the same anyway.

That being said, the cost-effective stuff is really great value. But it may not be suitable for everyone, 4800+ can take care of both the game and the multi** is very attractive for players. But just to watch Gao Qing movies and play small 3D games, it's good to use 4000+ at 65nm or 3800+ at 90nm, and 690G chipset if you use integrated graphics.

Use the 8600GT (with 256MB DDR3 or more).

or an HD 2600 (with 256MB DDR3 or more).

Power supply 350W (to see the actual power, not to see the maximum power).

The accurate names of AMD single-core 3800+ and dual-core 3800+ are AMD Athlon™ 64 3800+ (single-core) and AMD Athlon™ X2 3800+ (dual-core), the difference between the two is the main frequency, number of cores, number of pins, power consumption and L2 cache, the following is a comparison of the parameters of the two CPUs:

1.Main frequency: AMD Athlon™ 64 3800+, AMD Athlon™ X2 3800+.

2.Number of cores: AMD Athlon 64 3800+ is single-core, AMD Athlon X2 3800+ is dual-core.

3.Pin count: 940pin for AMD Athlon™ 64 3800+, 939pin for AMD Athlon™ X2 3800+.

4.Power consumption: 65W for AMD Athlon™ 64 3800+ and 95W for AMD Athlon™ X2 3800+.

5.L2 cache: 512KB for AMD Athlon 64 3800+ and 512KB*2 for AMD Athlon X2 3800+.

Athlon 64 3800+ Socket-AM2 2400MHz 512KB

Athlon 64 x2 3800+ socket AM2 2000MHz 1MB dual-core.

The main frequency of a single core is higher than that of a dual core, but his secondary cache is a dual-core 1 2, from the work of the two performance is about the same, but after running two programs, you will feel the advantage of the dual core, which is obvious, for example, while watching a movie while playing games, with a single core will feel more card, after all, it is a u to solve two problems, so the speed will be slower and will feel more card, if you use a dual-core, that is, a u to solve a problem, so the speed will be faster, That's the difference between dual core and single core.

The double one is faster than the single one.

AMD A6-3600 APU clock, turbo frequency, benchmark score 2817

AMD A8-3800 APU clock, turbo frequency, benchmark score of 2312

The A8-3800 has about 20-25% better overall performance than the A6-3600.

690g can support 3800x2

The 3600 L2 cache is two 256k

The 3800 Secondary Brigade Stuffy Cache is two 512k

However, recently, it seems that the new cons have been included in the version of the rental town without 3600 512k.

The difference is that 3800+ is a little better than 3600+, which is supported by the motherboard.

1m My desktop is this, and it doesn't need to be tested.

The performance of the 90nm 3600+ is very close to the 3800+ in terms of multi**, and the gap is within 5 compared to the 3800+, but it is far worse in terms of games, with a difference of more than 10 65nm of 3600+ In the case of no overclocking, the multi** performance is slightly worse than the 3600+ of 90nm, but due to its L2 double, the game performance is slightly stronger than the 3600+ of 90nm, but it is still about 8 behind the 3800+, as for its multi** performance and 3800+The difference is even further, the difference is more than 13 But now the 65nm 3600+ has a very strong overclocking ability, which can be easily overclocked without adding voltage.

The key depends on what kind of process you said about 3600 + 3800 + 4200 (that is, how many nanometers).

There is no difference, there is a difference in frequency, there is a difference in pins, one is 939, and the others are 940.