Scientific time discussion, scientific discussion of time theory

The problem is that no one can exceed the speed of light now, and if you think about it, if our speed exceeds the speed of light, then we will not see everything before the light arrives, and that is probably the so-called future. Alas, don't talk, I'm a bit messy, I'm a liberal arts student, I personally understand, don't laugh at me! Actually, I read that paragraph a long time ago, and I think it makes sense, and I've always been impressed, at least he gave us an answer.

Agree. Scientific theories are constantly being overturned and established, and there is no such thing as a perfect theory in the advancing world, and before that Socrates was considered absolute.

Later Aristotle, Copernicus and Copernicus had false theories that were overturned, and so on, when there was a man in our time who proved that Einstein was wrong or not entirely right.

Then our world is progressing again.

Time is equal for any geography.

In fact, everything you see now is happening in the past, only in a brief interval, imperceptible, and even beyond the speed of light, what you see is only closer to the present. Only when we reach absolute speed can we say that everything we see in front of us is now.

I don't think time can be turned back. If time can go back, then the newborn child will not return to the mother's body.

Those who have just died are resurrected again. This is simply a myth.

Big brother, this is a theory, scientists have done experiments to fly a few nanoseconds longer than others, so the preliminary affirmation of the theory that "beyond the speed of light can make time stand still".

The notion that you can see the future faster than the speed of light is wrong.

Time is the same for any region, for example, the stars you see now, it took hundreds of millions of light years to reach your eyes, it is always an image of the past, if it exceeds the speed of light, it can only be said that the scene you see is closer to the present than what you just saw, even if it is an absolute speed, what you see is the stars at the same time as you.

In short, the future is not visible.

This question comes from Albert Einstein. He defined the speed of light as a coordinate quantity. A determined quantity is used to calculate more complex formulas.

Many science fiction ** borrowed this theory and made up a lot of stories through time and space.

In general relativity, space can be distorted. Therefore, the derived theory will assume that there will be turbulence in space-time.

If that were the case, people would be able to appear in a distant time or space in an instant. It is even possible to go back in time.

The speed of light is used here as an absolute constant calculation. It's not that there is no superluminal speed in the universe, but humans need to use constants to calculate formulas.

There is no beginning and no end, which is about time, a circle, there is no beginning and no end, the place where the beginning is also the place where it ends, where it is born and where it is destroyed.

Time is a scalar quantity, and time has no dimension, so there is a past; Right now; future space-time; There is no stuffiness in the logical confusion.

But Einstein's space-time tunnel is its inference, and it is difficult to read the hymn to prove that it is correct.

It should have started in the thirties and forties of the 20th century, after Hubble gave Hubble's law.

In 1929, Hubble further discovered that the ratio of the rate of galaxies receding to the distance of galaxies was a constant through statistical analysis of more than 20 galaxies whose distances had been measured. There is a linear relationship between the two. This relationship came to be known as Hubble's Law.

In 1932, Lemath first proposed the modern theory of the universe, and in 1946, the American physicist Gamow formally put forward the theory of the great world, believing that the universe was formed by a large theory that occurred about 20 billion years ago.

I don't know you very well, I don't think you can accept the plan I said, so I think you should ask the class teacher or teacher to help you arrange it, after all, they know your learning situation and your requirements best, or let them help you plan your time!

In the morning, you should memorize the English routine, often look at the papers you have examined, it is best to look at the ones you can't do before going to bed, so that you can find the solution ideas when you look at the questions, as long as you do it every day, it will definitely work, and the effect is also very good, it is best to do some papers tomorrow. Come on, I believe you can do it.