I bought my sister in law s house, but my sister in law and her husband quietly discussed not gettin

However, it is very dangerous, and it is obvious that you want to trap people, so hurry up and urge it, which will seriously lead to the loss of your property. 1. There is only the right to use, not the right to dispose of the houseAccording to the provisions of the Property Law of China, the establishment, alteration, transfer and extinction of real estate rights shall be registered in accordance with the law, and shall take effect when recorded in the real estate register. When you want to ** the house, because there is no name of the heir on the real estate deed, it will lead to the inability to transfer the house.

I'm sure you can't have given money without leaving a note, right? Of course, it's not right for them to take money but not get it. Even if the note doesn't state what the money was for, it's a sure fact that they took your money.

I suggest that you stop dwelling on the problem of whether they can get through the house, and that the important thing now is to get all the documents back and get the money back.

The house can not be theirs, if the money suffers because of this, then you will lose your wife and soldiers.

However, if they are delaying you, you will have to go through the legal route, proof of the flow of funds to buy a house, an agreement to buy a house, tell them that they are ready to sue, just discuss, and sue if you don't negotiate.

If the other party does not take the house, then the house is not yours, then you don't buy it, let the other party return the money, or transfer the house, there is no room for negotiation.

If there is a procedure for the payment of the house you want to buy a house. You can ask him for it back. If necessary, you can go through legal procedures.

But it is not possible to have a household, there may be trouble in the future, this must be adhered to, otherwise you can't buy it, and normally your husband will not agree not to go to the household.

Is there a contract? Is there any evidence?

<> sister-in-law is her husband's sister. Since the children enjoy the same inheritance rights, the sister-in-law is the legal heir of course and should enjoy the right of inheritance.

If the parents leave a will and make it clear that the estate will be inherited by a child after 100 years, the inheritance will be carried out in accordance with the will if the will is valid. If there is no will, the inheritance is carried out in accordance with the statutory succession, and each child has the same right to inheritance.

Article 1123 of the Civil Code stipulates that [Validity of Statutory Succession, Testamentary Succession, Bequest and Bequest Maintenance Agreement] After the commencement of inheritance, it shall be handled in accordance with statutory inheritance; If there is a will, it shall be handled in accordance with the testamentary inheritance or bequest; Where there is a bequest and maintenance agreement, it shall be handled in accordance with the agreement.

Article 1126 stipulates that [men and women have equal inheritance rights] Men and women have equal inheritance rights.

Article 1127 stipulates that [Scope of Legal Heirs and Order of Succession] The inheritance of the estate shall be in the following order:

1) First order: spouse, children, parents;

2) Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not inherit; If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "children" includes legitimate children, children born out of wedlock, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "parents" includes biological parents, adoptive parents and step-parents in a dependent relationship.

The term "siblings" as used in this Part includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship.

First of all, I understand your feelings. After all, in our China, the parents' house must be left to the son after a hundred years, which is a custom for thousands of years. After all, on the issue of old-age care, our country still has to rely on our sons.

So "patriarchy" is a bit ugly. But there are really few parents who have the habit of leaving the house to their daughters and not to their sons. In the consciousness of many people, if a daughter marries into someone else's family, she is someone else's family and inherits the property in the future.

is also inheriting the real estate of her in-laws, and her own house is to be left to her son.

Driven by this concept, you learn that your in-laws have secretly transferred the property.

to their own daughters. It's like they're giving away something that belongs to you without your consent. However, what you need to understand now is that your in-laws are transferring their own house, which means that although it may be yours in the future, it is not your house yet, and they have the right to make their own choice.

Although you are not happy, it has now become a fact. There is no way to change it. If you go to your in-laws to theorize at this time, it will only make the family even more unhappy.

So I advise you to go to your in-laws to ask for clarification at this time. But not theoretically. Ask them why they now want to transfer the house to their sister-in-law.

Maybe it's because they feel that their daughter is living a hard life and want this house to give their daughter a little security. At this time, you should be generous and tolerant. Tell your in-laws, why are you hiding it from me, I don't disagree, I know that my sister-in-law is hard, and I feel distressed as a sister-in-law.

You hide it from me, as if I am unhappy, so that my sister-in-law misses me more. We are all a family, and we will tell me this kind of thing in the future, and others in the province will say how stingy I am.

Don't accept it, the in-laws' things love to whom, don't take the pension to coerce the in-laws, the pension is the responsibility of the children, it has nothing to do with you, even if you don't give a penny to the son, the son still needs to provide for the parents to support the elderly, in comparison, the girl is more at a loss, the girl's parents may not give any property when she gets married, and even the inheritance is not much, but you must also provide for the elderly, as for the loss, you can only blame your own parents for not complaining about your in-laws.

No way. Dissatisfaction is for sure. It stands to reason that since they did that, it means that they have also made up their minds in their hearts to take care of the children who need to get real estate in the future, so they just let it be, and the person who usually gets it will not ask too much for the other, so they ignore it so much, don't be too indignant, and know in their hearts that the old man doesn't like him.

If the old man wants to give one property, and take care of all the other, it is really bad luck, and he owes debts in his previous life.

If you are not satisfied, there is no way, because you do not have the property right of the house, that is, the house belongs to the in-laws, and it has nothing to do with you, the in-laws are alive, and the house does not belong to the inheritance, so you have no right to inherit and divide, the house belongs to the in-laws, and it is their intention to give the sister-in-law, since the in-laws did not give it to you, don't worry about this house, live your own life, and don't want things that don't belong to you.

What's not convinced, the house belongs to her in-laws, she can give it to whoever she likes, like my in-laws, the house is only for the eldest son, not for my husband, anyway, I just want to open, she is her, I am me, how she treats me, how I treat her.

It's all such a strange idea that gives my daughter all kinds of unhappiness and doesn't want to support her parents. Isn't the majority of daughters in families where sons inherit a house and take care of their parents, and if you're a daughter who inherits that house, what you see are brothers and sisters-in-law who don't want to support their parents? What's wrong?

Parents shouldn't have a house, now everyone is balanced, don't worry about your parents' industry! Respect your parents' decisions, live your own life, and you will always rely on your own efforts!

My house will definitely be left to my daughter in the future, girls have to work hard in society, and they have to get pregnant in October, with a house in hand, she has confidence in her heart, she can work if she wants to, and if she doesn't want to work, she will use it to collect rent, and she will not be angry. If the boy's conditions are good, he will not want to make progress, and what will he do to support his family. Anyway, we are not ready to rely on our children at all, and it is not as useful to rely on anyone as money as to rely on it.

The in-laws are partial to their eldest son, I have been in the door for nine years, the bride price of the two of them paid for their own money, the two children's in-laws have not given a penny of clothes and have not bought a piece, until this year to take a hand to show me the child, I have thought about the problem of pension in the future, even if they do not give the child, the most basic food, clothing, drink and shelter I will still provide, and I will take care of it wholeheartedly. If they give the house to their eldest son again this time, I think they will definitely break off the relationship! I'm just a soft persimmon, and everyone likes to pinch it twice