Has India s economic development surpassed China s, and why does it always like to compare with Chin

Not really, GDP: In 2003, China's total GDP was $1,08 trillion, ranking sixth in the world, and India's GDP was $479,404,000,000, ranking 12th in the world.

In terms of GDP in PPP terms, China's GDP in 20043 will be US$4,966 billion, and India's will be US$2,432 billion. In 2004, the per capita GDP of Chinese was $4,329 and that of India was $2,464. From 1990 to 2000, China's GDP grew at an average annual rate of 10.3 and India's was 6.

India is already a big circle behind China, China and India are both neighbors and populous countries, and are currently the two countries with the fastest economic growth in the world.

Indian academic circles love to take China as an important reference object to study the Indian economy, and Chinese academic circles also have a special fondness for the comparison of China's and India's comprehensive national strength.

Now we compare the economic conditions of the two countries, measure the two countries in the global coordinates, and focus on comparing the international competitiveness and economic globalization of the two countries.

Data and comparison of nominal and real GDP Capital is the basic element of economic growth, and the level of savings and investment is directly related to the speed of economic growth. During the period from 1997 to 1999, China's total domestic savings as a percentage of GDP and the ratio of total domestic investment to GDP were respectively compared with India's in the same period. China's total domestic investment grew at an average annual rate of growth during the period 1990-1999, compared to India's.

In 1997, the ratio of China's market financing to GDP was India's, and in 1999, China's market financing reached US$330.7 billion, while India's was US$184.6 billion. In 1998, China's domestic investment accounted for only the world's share of domestic investment, while India's share was only. In 1995, China's capital market accounted for only 4 of the world's capital, while India's was 0, while in 1998 China rose to 0

840 o, India dropped. In 1975, China's capital resources accounted for only one of the world's shares, India's share, and in 1998, China's capital resources accounted for only one of the world's total, and India's share of China's capital resources in the world was twice that of India. In 2001, China's domestic savings rate was 3, and India's investment rate was 22

4％、。It can be seen that whether it is the domestic savings rate or investment rate, or the position in the world's capital resources, China is much higher than India, which is also one of the main reasons for the difference in the economic growth rate between China and India.

In the 80s of the last century, our total GDP was only equivalent to 1 10 of Japan and 1 20 of the United States. It took China 30 years to overtake Japan, and now it has reached 70% of the United States. The road that China has traveled is not a secret journey, China can walk, India and Vietnam can also go, and now the manufacturing outflow of the Pearl River Delta and the Yangtze River Delta is this trend.

So it is not impossible for India to catch up with China.

Not really, it can't surpass China in the future!

India's rapid economic growth will overtake China's? Experts tell the truth.

That's a dream, India can't, although China's economic growth is slowing down, but it is impossible for India to catch up with China in the short term.

I've been to India, and the image isn't bad. China is 50 years behind in infrastructure. Many trains do not have doors, and they are casually lying by the door, crowded with people.

Cars have to run a few steps to get up, and many don't have doors. The streets are indescribably dirty. Leper dogs are everywhere, even in New Delhi.

GDP is high, but 99% of wealth is not in the hands of ordinary people. Therefore, no matter how high the level is, the people have no share. Many of the city's civilians live in cardboard huts and take a bath on the side of the street.

All in all, dirty mess. The most uncomfortable thing is their untouchability system, which is not broken, and the Indian people will never have a bright day. Forever!

I have talked to Indian friends, and they are very envious of China, and they all give a thumbs up, saying that it would be nice if India was as rich as China. I said, you work hard, they shook their heads and denied it, (not biased, biased to show approval) and said, it is impossible in a lifetime.

My colleague is an Indian aristocrat, and he said, "I don't want to go back to China, and I said, for example, if you are used to living in Switzerland, are you willing to go back to China?" So would you like to?

It may well be true, the economy is the population. China's family planning controls the population, while India's population does not. In the future, the most populous country will be India. And from a geopolitical point of view, China's biggest competitor is India.

China's economic growth rate, in the past 20 years, has been 3-5 times that of the United States. It's been 20 years, and the rest goes without saying.

The Chinese have enough stamina, and then they are even more powerful.

Let's solve the toilet problem first. It's not too late for people to talk about this if the train doesn't plug in.

The numbers don't say anything.

Whether a country's economy can sustainably develop should be assessed from the direction of the country's system, policies, and conditions.

China has developed rapidly for so many years, and it has not surpassed any developed country, and India's infrastructure is not as good as China's.

Hehe, this one, I don't think it's possible. Even if it could, it would not surpass China in terms of national strength. National strength and economy are two different things. National strength is a comprehensive factor.

Of course, this is the answer given that I don't know Indian culture. However, I believe that it is good for a country to be economically developed, but the most important thing is that it is better to have strong national cohesion under the influence of national culture, and that "economically developed countries alone are the most powerful", which is not an eternal truth. In the next century, the country will understand that economic development is illusory, and only national cohesion is hard power.

The point is, India's economy surpasses ours, and at the moment, I think it's a myth.

The reason for the rapid growth is that the economy is smaller than ours. When we were in the stage of economic aggregate development, the growth rate was in double digits.

Externally, our rapid development in those years was largely due to the global capital transfer at that time, as well as the transformation of the industrial structure and strong demand in Europe and the United States brought about by the explosion of new technologies led by the IT industry. India does not have this kind of international situation now, and in the face of the growing isolation and conservatism in Europe and the United States, as well as the economic recession of globalization, it is difficult to rely on the strong demand of the international market as China did in the past.

Internally, India's social diseases are at a great disadvantage compared to basic education, the East Asian cultural circle attaches more importance to knowledge, and the influence of religion on the secular is very low, so the development potential of China, Japan and South Korea is very high. These two points are very problematic for India.

Benefiting from a huge population base and a relatively friendly international environment, India still has great potential for development, but in terms of the industrial opportunities brought about by this wave of technological revolution, the dividends have basically been eaten up by countries such as China, the United States and South Korea, and the remaining leftovers are not enough for a country of India's size to maintain rapid growth for several years. India may be able to rise to become a great power with China and the United States in the future, but at least it will have to wait until the next industrial upgrade.

China's GDP is calculated differently than India's GDP, have you heard that India's cow can be counted into India's GDP?

When India doesn't pee in the open, let's talk about it.

If you look at the actual data, what is China's GDP of ten trillion US dollars, multiplied by 7%? India's two trillion US dollars, how much is it multiplied by 8%?

Britain abandoned India that year. It is because India is overwhelmingly inferior except for a few higher surnames. There are still so many inferior people. It's really hard to manage. So rather give up. Inferior 10 million years later is still inferior. Genes can't be changed.

It's hard to say that this kind of macro stuff has not been surpassed so far, but I have seen an article that introduces that large listed companies with Indian nationality in the United States have many more positions than in China, that is, China's international management talent is significantly lower than that of India.

India's rapid economic growth is mainly due to India's demographic advantage, which itself generates a demographic dividend. Secondly, India's economy itself is relatively backward, and if it grows a little, the growth rate will be very high, which is determined by the base of the economy. For example, the economic growth rate of the United States is not high, but the actual growth rate is very fast, this is because the United States itself has a good economic foundation and a high gross national product, so every point of growth, the value of the actual growth is huge, so you look at India's economic growth, and the strength of the people, and look at the average disposable income per capita more intuitively.

At present, although China is the second largest economy in the world, the per capita income of the people is still not high, and India will be the same in the future

1. Population and education. India has empty populations, and those populations are just numbers, simple numbers. More than half of the population is a pure illiterate person who doesn't know a word, but how many illiterate people in China do you find who don't know words?

After China's large-scale popularization of basic education, the population can adapt to the era of digital industrialization and become excellent workers, so it can enjoy the demographic dividend. India? There are only a few schools in the whole country, and universal education is empty talk, let alone a demographic dividend.

2. Infrastructure, an important factor in China's rapid development is the large-scale construction of roads, railways and other roads, high-speed railways, airports, etc. in the last century, and infrastructure construction was carried out under the pressure of being scolded by the people of the whole country. To get rich, you have to build roads, and it turned out to be a very wise move, and transportation is a necessary factor in economic development. India doesn't have it, the infrastructure is a mess, there are not many railways in the country, and the country still helps to repair it.

Still preaching all day long to surpass China, how can it be surpassed?

3. The caste system, although the caste system in India is legally the best, but the people's minds are still stuck in the caste system, on the one hand, they talk about themselves as a model country of democracy, but on the other hand, they don't feel anything about the enslavement of the lower castes by the high castes. It's ...... like a ghostWhen China was founded in the last century, Grandpa Mao said that women can hold up half the sky and truly achieve equality, even now it is surpassed. Indian women, basically have to do all the work, men can not work.

There is also the saying that 100 million people and 1 billion beasts, the ideas are not equal, and I don't understand how they say that they are democracies.

4. Long-term planning, from the aspect of building highway infrastructure, it can be seen that China's party has a very high vision, planning step by step, and can formulate a development plan for decades, step by step to realize, and will not rush for quick success. And India didn't, what about India, 30 years ago, the military was much stronger than China, but all kinds of buying, buying, buying, buying more, began to be arrogant, to develop its own fighter jet, the glorious fighter, to kill this and that, tossing for more than 30 years finally succeeded, and then ......China's fifth-generation aircraft have all come out, and the brilliance is only three generations, while India is boasting that it wants to kill China's fifth-generation aircraft in seconds, and then as soon as the third-generation brilliance comes out, they began to shout that they want to build their own fifth-generation fighters and directly cross the fourth-generation aircraft ......Hmmm......I don't know what to say.

The caste system alone is destined to be impossible for India to develop as well as China.

China's means of production are publicly owned, and it is very easy for the state to use the country's manpower, material, and financial resources to carry out super projects. India has private ownership of land, and it is very difficult to acquire land for engineering construction.

China's state power is concentrated in ****, and the local government must obey it. India's **** has limited power, cannot command the states**, and cannot mobilize the strength of the whole country.

The equality of all ethnic groups in China is truly achieved. The Indian caste system cannot**.

Science and technology are the primary productive forces, and China relies on science and technology to rejuvenate the country. Religion hinders the development of productive forces, and India is a religious country.