Onboard graphics card 6100 and Duli graphics card 5200 that is good 10

In comparison, the 5200 is good, but if you play games, both are rubbish, the 5200 has long been eliminated, and your motherboard should be a PCI-E slot, it can't be plugged in, the 5200 is AGP, and there is no Core 2+AGP motherboard.

5200 should not be plugged into your new motherboard and your configuration is unbalanced 4000+ with 2G memory with 6100 motherboard I don't know which rookie matched it for you.

5200 is rubbish, maybe you haven't noticed it yet, but it's a well-known fact.

Your motherboard is really average I don't know why you chose 6100 It's already going to be eliminated Your CPU is too low If you want to play Interstellar 2, it is recommended that you change it Graphics card can be bought later But Interstellar 2 doesn't know when it will come out Can you wait In short, your computer is very rookie If it is newly saved, it is recommended that you change a set of configurations.

5200, but 5200 can't play large 3D games.

It is said that the Duli graphics card is better than the onboard graphics card. But if you're too low-end, you can't play a big game, and you can't hold either of them.

LZ 4000 CPU You use a 6100 graphics card, I don't know how much memory you have, just looking at it like this, it feels very incompatible, buy a 7300 or 7600GT and plug it in.

Now the 690g onboard is relatively good.

It's easier to play amd.,If you want to be overclocked, you can buy Intel.,If it's not super, it's still AMD.,It is recommended that you go to 7300 or 7600 The current game can be handled.,1G on the memory.。

The discrete graphics of the 5200 is better than the integrated 6100.

The performance of the 6100 graphics card is about 80 of the 5200.

However, both are good for 3D games in general.

If you don't play big games, 6100 is recommended. You can save more than 300 yuan. Onda's NG1GT motherboard with integrated 6100 graphics card is only 499 yuan, which can be said to be very value-for-money.

The integrated one is generally not as good as the independent 6100, which may show that the core technology is better, but it is integrated, so the memory of the system needs to be used, and it will certainly not reach the same level of independent 6100 capabilities, and it should be noted that the number of bits of the graphics card.

The discrete graphics 5200 is better, at least a double 128

It's pretty much the same, the performance is very low, and you can only play average games.

The architecture is relatively old, one is G5 and the other is G6.

Both the frequency and the video memory speed are not as high as the 6100.

If you have two 512s to form a dual channel, the performance will definitely be better than the standard version of the 5200, but the performance of the whole system may be reduced because of this

6100 is an integrated graphics card, 5200 is a discrete graphics card, and under large memory, such as 1G, 6100 is better than 5200.

The performance looks similar. But discrete graphics cards have their own GPU (graphics processing unit), as well as their own video memory. The integrated ones rely on the CPU for computing and share memory capacity.

The discrete 5200 is better, and the 6100 is an integrated graphics card, which needs to be divided into memory for video memory. Although both are 128, the speed of independent video memory and memory is very different. Usually the memory speed of the 5200 is about 4 nanoseconds, but the speed of the memory is much slower, 6 7 nanoseconds (the lower the value, the better, and the shorter the time, the faster the reflection).

Like now, the speed of 7900gs is in nanoseconds, and the graphics card upgrade is really fast Mine is 5200, 128 megabytes, memory is 1g, and the priest of the second district. Very smooth, no problem.

Actually, the former one has better performance. The 6100 is an integrated version of the 6200, and the performance is very good, and the performance is better than the 5200 due to the architectural advantages. The dual-core 3600+ is definitely stronger than the single-core P4 24.

As for memory....DDR support is limited in maximum capacity. Because you often run big software, the first one is stronger than the second. The gameplay of the first one is much stronger than the second.

In terms of graphics card, it is the latter that is stronger. But the computer in the back has too little memory. The overall performance is still high in the previous one.

It must be Athlon 3600+, after all, it is dual-core. Compared to the P4, it is not the same generation product. The 6100 integrated graphics card is no worse than the FX5200, and the graphics card can surpass the FX5200 under overclocking.

Warcraft should be open low to play. Even if you sell another graphics card, it's the first set of cost-effective.

The performance should be about the same, but the FX5200 at least doesn't take up much system memory and has less overhead on other hardware than the integrated one!

It is recommended that you use a 6100 motherboard. After a while, if you feel that the performance of the graphics card is not enough, or you have the money to buy a good graphics card, you can buy a better graphics card without wasting it. However, the 6150 motherboard with 939 interface is recommended, and the performance of the 6100 is not as good as that of the 6100, but it is slightly more expensive.

It's better if it's almost the same level of independence.

If it's 5200 and 6100, I think the integration would be better.

Kao, and said that 5200 is good, it's not simple, don't ask others to scold it.

The integrated 6100 display core, of course. The 5200 graphics card claims to be the cheapest graphics card that supports DirectX9, although it supports DirectX9, but the special effects of DirectX9 can't be brought up at all, and the game performance of Direct3D is even inferior to Radeon9200.

Although it is a standalone GeForce FX 5200, the performance has been tested to be similar to the GMA900 graphics chip integrated in Intel's 915GM motherboard.

You know, the GMA900 is nowhere near as good as the integrated GeForce 6100.

5200 is also the least worthwhile discrete graphics card, 6100 is now an entry-level graphics card.

So obviously the 6100 is slightly better.

It is recommended that you can use 6100 to make a transition now, which is economical and affordable, and you can buy a 7300gt with 600 yuan.

How can it be regarded as the integration of the 6200 display core.

It's just that the video memory used is memory.

Switching to a larger amount of memory will improve performance.

Halo The ones upstairs are really funny 6100 can be better than 5200 Have you used 3DMark03 You run and run Look at that score 6100 can be better than MX440.

If it is compared with the FX5200 double 128, it is still 5200's, but the 6100 integrated in the main version is not enough in the future, you can upgrade the graphics card, in terms of graphics card performance, it is still 5200 stronger, after all, it does not occupy physical memory.