I committed suicide by jumping into the river, but I was not saved by someone, is it a big life

That's the good thing that saved you.

Personally, I believe that there are at least three options.

1. Choose from the perspective of rescue success rate.

Whoever is close to the shore has a relatively higher success rate of being rescued. Therefore, it will not be considered who committed suicide by jumping into the river and who fell into the water. The only thing that needs to be considered is the distance between the two of them and the shore, and the person who is close to the shore is rescued first, the success rate is high, and the probability of saving him alive is greater.

It's the most rational and efficient option, and no one will criticize it. After all, the purpose of rescue is to help the person out of danger.

2. Choose from a perceptual point of view.

The man who committed suicide by jumping into the river did not want to live, and the man who fell into the water did not want to die, hoping that someone would save his life. Therefore, it must be the first to save the person who fell into the water, and to save him ashore first, which will also save his life. It not only conforms to the purpose of the rescuer, but also satisfies the wishes of the person who fell into the water, and everyone is happy.

Why don't you save the person who committed suicide by jumping into the river first, because it itself is rushing to die, and it has given up its own life. Even if he is rescued first, it is difficult to guarantee that he will not commit suicide by jumping into the river again, or choose other ways to end his life.

To save this kind of person, it is not just as simple as pulling him ashore from the river, but to rescue his mind, psychology and mentality, so that he can give up the idea of suicide. Otherwise, he will have him once, and he will not be able to save his life, and sooner or later he will end his life.

3. Choose from a rational point of view.

When faced with a suicide by jumping into the river and a person who has fallen overboard, the first thing to consider is whether you can swim. If you can't swim, then after entering the water, not only will you not be able to save either of them, but your life will also be threatened.

Moreover, there were originally only two people who fell into the water, but after they entered the water, they became three people who fell into the water. When others are rescuing, they also need to save one more person, and unintentionally adding difficulty to the rescue work of others. It's not about helping to save people, it's about adding to the chaos.

Therefore, if I couldn't swim, I wouldn't have chosen to go into the water to save those two people. Instead, you should seek help from other swimmers and call the police for help.

Generally speaking, when faced with a suicide by jumping into the river and a person who fell into the water, there are many choices about who saves whom. At the same time, you also need to consider whether you have the ability to rescue.

Of course, it's the one who fell into the water.

1: Subjectively, it can be seen that one is active and the other is accidental, of course, the accident must be saved first. It's no surprise.

2: Objectively, one has no hope of survival, he will resist you to save him, and may even affect himself, and the other has a desire to survive, he will cooperate a little and be relatively safe. The odds of survival are better.

3: After the person who fell into the water is rescued, he will definitely not commit suicide, after the person who committed suicide is rescued, he may still commit suicide, then you can't follow him all the time, so that two people will die, save the person who fell into the water, he will not commit suicide, at least save one, if you save the person who wants to commit suicide, you may not be saved in the end, this is what we don't want to see.

4: To sum up, I think it is the most reasonable choice to save the person who has fallen into the water.

Hello! A person who does not cherish life is not enough to save him, and it is useless to save him. So if you choose between jumping into the river and committing suicide or falling into the water, I will unswervingly save those who have fallen into the water!

The sea rises and the moon rises at this time.

I will definitely save the person who fell into the water first, after all, this person just fell into the water by accident, and it is relatively worth rescuing.

On the premise that I can only save one person, I will fall into the water. Because the person who falls into the water accidentally stumbles on himself, not because he wants to die, but the person who jumps into the river and commits suicide himself wants to die, even if he is rescued, maybe he will die in the future, which is unfair to the person who stumbles.

A person jumps into the river to commit suicide, a person falls into the water, in this case, he will not hesitate to save the closest one to himself, because first solve the problem around him and then solve it, the one far away from himself, if none of the people around him are rescued, the one who is far away is not saved, and both lives are lost, of course, if colleagues can save two people together, that is the best way, if there are two people on the shore, it can help two people out of danger of life.

When I saw this topic, I thought of a question I had many years ago, daughter-in-law, mother, who should be saved when they fell into the river at the same time? When I was a child, I said that only my mother is good in the world, and with my mother, I am a treasure. However, when he grew up, he married his daughter-in-law and had another family.

Now, my father and we are two families, my daughter-in-law and I have a quilt and a pot, and we are like one person, but my mother has become the closest in the past, and my daughter-in-law is the closest in front of us, so saving my daughter-in-law is the first choice. However, now, the two fell into the water at the same time, the mother and the daughter-in-law, one far and one near, if the daughter-in-law is near, there is no need to choose, just save it, if the daughter-in-law is far away, then your choice in case the two of them can't be saved, this has become the biggest sorrow. Therefore, first save the near place, and then save the far place, at this moment, you have no room to think, only instinct, maybe move the heavens, both can be saved, and they are all happy.

In the same way, at this time, whether it is a person who commits suicide or a person who stumbles, it is a matter of human life. Even if a person who commits suicide is in trouble at this moment, he can't think about it for a while, and if someone enlightens him, he can get through this special moment. Therefore, being able to save one person is considered one person, and being able to save two people is the greatest good thing.

Therefore, in an emergency, there is no time for you to think about the problem, hurry up and start nearby, no matter which one, it is important to go into the water to save people.

The person who commits suicide, save him, he will not be grateful to you more than complaining about you, he will choose to leave if he is desperate for the world, you save him is equivalent to pulling him back into his abyss, it will be more painful, and the person who falls into the water is different, he just accidentally fell into the water, he still has his life, saving him, it will be more valuable, although there is no way to measure human life, I have to choose a person who I think it will be more meaningful to save the person who fell into the water, of course, it is best to save it, If you want to commit suicide and be enlightened, you can still persuade him to come back and give him a bright future.

Suicide by jumping into the river is suicide, and falling into the water is an accident, the former is voluntarily giving up life, and the latter is forced, so you will definitely choose to save the person who fell into the water. Of course, it also depends on the specific situation, and save the people who are easy to save first, such as those who are closer to the shore

I think we should save the person who fell into the water first, the reason is that the suicide person's own ideology is to die, if you save it first, the success rate is not necessarily low, the person who fell into the water did not intentionally fall into the water, therefore, the desire to survive is stronger than the suicide, and the person who fell into the water must take the initiative to cooperate with the rescue success rate is high, so, when encountering this situation at the same time, it is the best choice to save the person who fell into the water first.

I think that no matter what kind of overboard, it is a life, life is above all else, you should save the nearest person who fell into the water first, so that the success rate is the highest, whether it is in theory or in practice, it is the best choice to save the nearest person first.

Thank you. I think there are three situations that can be rescued:

1. If they are of the same gender and of similar age, they should be rescued first.

Because he or she did not choose death and understands the value of life, he or she should be respected and deserve our help as soon as possible.

And those who commit suicide by jumping into the river have chosen to give up their lives, have no courage to live, and evade their responsibilities to their families, they are cowards! For this kind of person, death is a relief for him or her. Therefore, the rescue can be postponed.

2. If there is a child among those who fall into the water, there is no doubt that the child should be rescued first. Among the people, the weakest are the children, they are the future of the motherland, and it is the bounden duty of adults to protect their health and grow up safely.

3. If it is an old man or a young person, I think that no matter what, save the old man first.

Because 1The old man has worked hard for his children for most of his life, and Fu may not have enjoyed it and left like this, which is too sad!

2.Due to old age and frailty, the elderly may only be able to support themselves in the water for a moment, and the coefficient of instant death will be greater.

3.Young men are strong, and unless they are determined to die, they have a chance to survive even if they delay a little.

Of course, in reality, if there are young and old people who fall into the water at the same time, whether they stumble or commit suicide, I think the old people will definitely give the last chance to survive to the young people. Because, the elderly have children and have more compassion! Older people also know better

The weight of young people in society and in the family!

To be honest, when you really encounter this scene in reality, how can you have time to analyze and consider, and the approaching person who falls into the water must be rescued first! After all, if you fall into the water, he still wants to live, and if you save the diving, maybe he won't be grateful to you, and he will hate you.

This question is a bit interesting, a person commits suicide, a person stumbles, they all jump into the water anyway, and they are almost drowned in the water anyway, so who should you save? Okay, which one to save first? In fact, many of these assumptions are not very valid, for example, you don't know which one is a suicide and which one is a mistake, so how can you judge in such a short period of time?

It may only be a minute, so how do you judge, how do you tell the difference?

The second question is that suicide is a human being, and a stumbling step is also a human being, so who said why should we save a person who has lost his footing and not save a person who commits suicide? In the final analysis, the value of anyone's life is very important, but it can't be compared to who is heavier and who is lighter, if it is heavier than that, it can only be said to be as heavy and lighter. For the second question, the two of them are equally important for life.

The answer to the third question is very clear, that is, in the case that you can't tell whether they are stumbling or committing suicide, and in such a short period of time, you can't tell the difference, this is the answer to the first question; Then there is the second question is that life is not important, everyone is priceless, so you say that you can't only save anyone, it's better to save them all, isn't it? In the case of such a question, our third question is who to save? The answer is whoever is easy to save will save whom, because in the case of what you can't tell the difference, you can save one now is one, and in the absence of any assumptions, no matter how you assume the scene, it is impossible to say, you can only call one, the scene must be the first to save which one is very easy to save, and then save the second one after saving, for why they fell into the water, how to fall into the water?

That's later, let's save it first, because no one is more important than no one in life.

A person who commits suicide can't think about it for a while, and if he can ensure his safety, he can save people, but he can't make trouble if he doesn't know water. With the increasing pressure of modern society, the number of suicides is also increasing year by year. In such a situation, many people will consider saving the suicide, but often these people will not care about their own safety, or even sacrifice themselves to save the suicide.

Is this behavior worth it? This article will discuss this topic by listing 6 specific reasons.

First of all: from a moral and human point of view, we should try to save people. Human life is priceless, and when life is in danger, we should do our best to save it, no matter what the cost.

If you sacrifice yourself to save the dead, although this act is very martyrdom, it is also a selfless and noble performance.

Secondly, from a moral and moral point of view, it is everyone's responsibility and obligation to help others. If we see a person in danger and we have the power to save him, then we should not hesitate to act. Although it may cost one's own life to do so, it is a noble act that is in line with social morality and moral ethics.

Finally, from the perspective of resource utilization, we should also do our best to help the victims. Everyone is valuable, and if we can save the victim and save his life, then we are not only saving a person's life, but also avoiding an underutilized social resource.

However, despite this, we should also realize that sacrificing ourselves to save others is not the only option, nor is it necessarily the best option. On the one hand, we should do our best to help others, but we should not neglect our own safety. If we don't have the ability to help, then it's best not to risk saving others, so as not to cause greater danger.

On the other hand, we should also actively promote the improvement of the social system and build a more harmonious, just and loving society. Only in this way can we truly solve the problem of suicide and make our society a better place.

Therefore, in order to help others, it is more necessary to act in a rational and safe way.

Summary: It is everyone's responsibility to help others, but we should also pay attention to safety. If you are not absolutely sure, you can't easily enter the water to save people, since you must be sure that you will be okay and can ensure your own safety before you can save people.