What are the changes in the 2010 postgraduate English syllabus compared to last year? Please be elab

You just go buy a book and look at it first, and then you can understand the original differences, and it usually doesn't change much

<> First, changes to the requirements for reading ability in graduate school: "Analyze the rhetorical devices used in the text, argumentation methods, etc.", that is, this year may add questions for analyzing rhetorical devices; Changed the phrase "guessing the meaning of new words based on context" to "inferring the meaning of words and phrases based on context", which means that a new question for guessing the meaning of phrases may be added this year.

Second, in the requirements for writing to be able to meet the requirements of the Guardian of the Heavens: English 1 clearly puts forward the requirements that candidates should meet. In addition, for the elaboration of the types of practical texts, new notices and minutes have been added to the English 1 and English 2 outlines.

In view of the above changes, candidates who want to prepare for English 1 should pay attention to the following controls, check and fill in the gaps according to their own changes in the part of the changes, and strive to achieve a good score in the exam.

1) Minor changes to the outline glossary.

Add 15:

ascribe、benevolent、broker、buffer、choir、chunk、 custody、decree、discharge、eradicate、hybrid、landscape、pottery、predator、strand

Deleted 7: Meditaate, Neutron, Shilling, Traitor, Treason, Vowel, Zebra

Added "Candidates should also master English word formation methods such as transformation and synthesis, be able to derive words according to commonly used prefixes and suffixes, and hold common abbreviations in their hands".

2) In the past, the scope of the grammar test of English 1 was relatively general, and it only said that "candidates should be able to use basic grammar knowledge proficiently", unlike English 2, which listed the requirements of the Eight Potatoes, then the 23 English syllabus was unified.

3) Fill in the blanks has not changed much.

4) Reading comprehension changes.

5) The subheadings of the new question type of the bureau should be cancelled accordingly

Changes in English (1):

1. Vocabulary part: from the original "candidates should be able to master about 5,500 words and related phrases (see Appendix 1 for details)" to "candidates should be able to master about 5,500 words and the content in the relevant schedules".

The relevant schedule includes outline vocabulary, common prefix suffixes, common abbreviations, and the names of some countries and continents.

2. Writing part: The scoring criteria of 5-6 points for small essays and 9-12 points for large essays are changed from "content is relatively coherent" to "content is basically coherent".

Fourth, the fifth grade of the scoring standard added "the vocabulary is quite limited".

There are no changes to the syllabus of the English II test compared to last year.

Regarding the changes in the new syllabus, the author's review suggestions for students are as follows:

1. The new syllabus of English (1) highlights the increased difficulty of the vocabulary part of the examination. It is recommended that candidates should not only be proficient in the syllabus words, but also master some of their synonyms, synonyms, and antonyms; There are also common root affixes. When studying past papers, special attention is paid to developing the ability to guess words.

2. English (1) candidates should pay attention to when reviewing their writing: it is even more impossible to get a high score by relying only on simple words. Students should learn a lot of new words from the past papers in reading comprehension, cloze and translation, and apply them boldly in writing.

3. The review of the English (II) exam can be done according to the usual conventions, that is, to master the common usage of the syllabus words, the common fixed collocations, and the eight grammar test points. These are the basics.

The above is an analysis of the new outline, and there are no significant changes overall.

Yale Postgraduate Entrance Examination answers for you: The 2016 postgraduate English syllabus has basically not changed, and it can be said with certainty that compared with the 2015 postgraduate English syllabus, there is no literal change in the 2016 postgraduate English 1 syllabus that we have seen so far, so you can review with peace of mind.

The requirements of the syllabus for reading and translation are "accurate, complete and fluent", and "accurate and complete" means to be "faithful" to the original text, to express the content of the original text completely and accurately, and not to arbitrarily add or delete content. "Smooth"It means that the language of the translated text should be logical and fluent, conform to the language habits of Chinese, and should not be obvious"Translation cavity"。Therefore, in the following review and preparation, candidates still have to split sentences according to the grammatical structure, analyze the components, and adjust the word order on the basis of accurate understanding.

The core test points are still the definite component, the adverbial component, the insertion language, the special structure, etc. There is no need to make any adjustments to the revision plan.

In addition to the reading comprehension part, which accounts for the most important part of the test paper, another highlight is the writing part, which accounts for 30 points. This part consists of two sections, A and B, which mainly test the candidate's written expression ability. Section A requires candidates to write a short practical essay of about 100 words (punctuation does not count) based on the given situation, including personal and official letters, memoranda, reports, etc.

Section B English 1 requires candidates to write a short essay of about 160-200 words based on the prescribed scenario or the outline given. Prompt messages can be in the form of topic sentences, writing outlines, prescribed situations, diagrams, tables, etc. There has also been no significant change in this requirement.

Hello, Zhonggong Education is at your service.

Compared with the 2015 syllabus, the content of the 2016 English syllabus has not changed, and it is still divided into: test nature, test objectives, test format, test content, and test paper structure. More information about the postgraduate entrance examination:

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask questions from Zhonggong Education Enterprise.

Teacher Jin Cheng analyzed the changes in the syllabus: First, the English vocabulary of the postgraduate entrance examination: The new postgraduate English syllabus requires candidates to master 5500 words, but among the 5500 words, only 2400 words are really often tested.

In this way, candidates need to study the meaning and fixed collocation of these 5500 words in detail. At the same time, in the part of examining candidates' vocabulary collocation, the new vocabulary collocation also needs to be understood by candidates in context. For example, in the 2005 postgraduate English exam "eat his words", candidates cannot understand it literally.

To put it into a specific context is to "admit that what you have said is wrong" and not to understand it as "breaking your word."

The syllabus requires 3% of the vocabulary to be allowed, which requires candidates to put more effort into learning vocabulary and guessing the meaning of words. At the same time, candidates also need to be familiar with the word formation of vocabulary and be able to understand the vocabulary that appears in the exam questions according to the word formation.

Second, the grammar requirements of the new syllabus have not changed, but the grammar test also requires candidates to be able to understand the real questions in context. For the grammatical requirements, candidates need to expand their reading and intensive reading to ensure that they can read and analyze the questions smoothly in the postgraduate examination.

Third, the requirements for the reading, completion, and translation sections of English 1 and 2. The reading comprehension of English 1 is mostly abstract and logical, while English 2 is more practical and concrete, and at the same time, it is less logical than the English 1 and English 2 articles.

The requirements for English 1 and 2 candidates are also very different. The completion form of English 1 requires candidates to understand it from the passage level, while English 2 requires candidates to solve the questions at the sentence level. In this way, there is a slight difference in the difficulty of the completion questions in English 1 and English 2.

In terms of translation, the difficulty of English 1 and English 2 is also more obvious. The translation part of English 1 is more difficult and the selected sentences are more logical, while the translation part of English 2 is mostly less formal and loose paragraphs.

Fourth, in the postgraduate examination essay part, referring to the previous past questions, Jincheng Postgraduate Entrance Examination provides candidates with the following postgraduate essay topics: traditional culture, civilized tourism, mental health, the value of innovation, down-to-earth dreams and the virtue of saving.