Why do famous college students steal takeaways?

As a college student of a famous university, the news of stealing takeaway did surprise many people, in everyone's impression, college students are a manifestation of quality, at least the education they receive in school, not only the education of knowledge, but also the teaching of literacy, but this is a wrong understanding of everyoneFirst of all, we must know that human character is innate, even if it is taught through acquired efforts, it will only change its surface, and its essence will not change.

Therefore, it can only be said that this so-called famous university student steals takeaway, which is a manifestation of his nature, and in recent years, for the so-called famous university students and even master's students in colleges and universities have done a lot of illegal behavior, which is shameful, all of which are some petty theft, which also reflects their long-term separation from society, and the deviation of family education from a young age, of course, it is not excluded that some students are born in single-parent families, so it will cause some aspects of personality distortion.

One thing we need to admit is that the general quality of students in universities is higher than that of idle people in society, and the idle people in society are young people with low educational qualifications, and they do not mean that they are low-quality performance, and you can often see those takeaway brothers, sacrificing themselves to save others and collecting money or a courier, some things to help others, they are the hardest people at the bottom of all society, but they have never complained, have no regrets, and work hard for life. That's why they're the loveliest people.

All those who spread positive energy and shine for this society are worthy of respect, so we don't deny a whole through one person, and don't deny all the students of famous universities because of this famous college student who steals takeaways, he only represents himself, and we must also see our own shortcomings, because everyone has shortcomings, but everyone deliberately avoids them and is unwilling to admit them.

Famous college students steal takeout, all for food. After all, I'm hungry myself, and I just need some food. If you don't steal it, it's very difficult to get through.

The reason is very simple, because there are good students and bad students in any school, and it is not necessarily that all students in famous schools are good, but there is something wrong with the character of this student.

Because he was not caught stealing takeaway for the first time, over time, he got used to stealing other people's takeaways.

Because he had been stolen before, there was an act of revenge. In addition, I thought that stealing takeout would not be discovered, so I kept stealing.

As for the behavior of college students stealing takeaways, I think it is not only a smear for college students, but also a thing worthy of our deep consideration. In the concept of a large number of people, college students are undoubtedly a group of educated and high-quality aspiring young people, and they are a powerful back-up force for the construction of the motherland. But now, with the progress of society and the increase in the number of types of universities, the gold content of college students seems to be gradually decreasing, and there are more and more behaviors similar to college students stealing takeaways.

What do you think of this incident?

1. First of all, the general amount is small and will not be recognized as a crime, but if it reaches a certain amount (the amount is cumulative, the conviction standard is like 1,000) or multiple thefts, it may constitute the crime of theft.

Second, as a college student, what you want, don't always think about getting other people's, think about what you have to get it yourself, everyone is a civilized person who has passed higher education, don't let your parents know that you are a thief at school that everyone shouts at, don't always start from your own one-third of an acre of land when you encounter problems, don't always think about dressing up your appearance glamorously.

So what are the reasons for the frequent occurrence of this phenomenon?

1. School inaction: I don't know if it was reported to the teacher after the student was stolen from the takeaway, but I have seen a lot of friends in the circle of friends, and there are teacher comments in the circle of friends, so it means that the teacher knows about it, but he didn't even post a notice, and then let it pass.

Second, most of the students who were stolen chose to settle the matter: I asked anyone in the group within the student union who had been stolen takeaway, and some students responded that their friends were stolen and their roommates were stolen several times, but when I made an announcement in the group saying that I would voluntarily set up a "thief group", no one was willing? These classmates who were stolen from the takeaway let it pass in this way.

So the next time the same problem arises, it will not be solved.

I think college students steal takeaways! Schools should pay more attention to !!

It's not about stealing takeaways, it's about itStealingThis thing.

The manifestation of the emphasis is to strengthen the punishment of such incidents, such as ideological education, demerits, etc., to deal with the severity of the thief's behavior accordingly, to improve the relevant management system for dealing with theft incidents, and to let the students know. At the same time, supervision can also be strengthened, and a camera can be installed to pick up food, which I personally feel is not an exaggeration at present.

After the epidemic, many schools have taken out food at a fixed pick-up point, rather than downstairs in the dormitory, in which case, the time difference between taking takeaway and picking up takeaway.

It is even greater, and the likelihood of being stolen is theoretically increased. Riders will text and ** notifications, but the text message will say three minutes later, and ten minutes later, in fact, they may have already delivered by the time this text message is sent. In other words, it doesn't mean that you arrive in three minutes or ten minutes before you meet a rider delivering the takeaway.

Of course, there are also the opposite situations, for example, something is delivered after 10 minutes, but it is not delivered after 10 minutes, and the student waits in place for nearly half an hour to get it.

Including the theft of takeaway, most of the students should have been stolen, and a meal of more than a dozen yuan, when you are lucky, explain to the merchant, the merchant will reissue a copy, when you are unlucky, you are waiting for your own money to order another one, hungry and waiting for the takeaway, so I think stealing takeaway is really shameful, and it has also brought economic problems and food and clothing problems to others, in short, we should take takeout in time, don't give the person who behaves badly a chance!

College students are the pride of heaven and the future of the motherland, shouldering the heavy responsibility of building a country with a sense of morality, and should be strict with themselves, while studying science and culture well, strive to improve their moral cultivation, and be a good student with both ability and political integrity and a sound physique. Don't do things that violate morality and etiquette and violate the law, "don't take evil as a small thing"!

This is a very bad behavior. On a small scale, it's just a meal. To a large extent, this is a person's integrity, even a violation of property rights.

If a college student can steal takeaways, I think he has not learned after so many years of education, the moral concept of stealing takeaways is weak, and there is a fluke mentality, he thinks that the person who is stolen will generally admit it, and it is not easy to be caught, and if he is caught, he can generally perfunctory the past, or say that he took the wrong one.

And now the takeout will not be expensive, you can eat a meal in your teens and twenties, I think those students who have stolen takeout should not do this in the future, which will affect your image, integrity and even character.

I think this kind of behavior is very normal, not that all people who have studied in college have very good conduct, but that they may be better at learning, but learning has nothing to do with a person's character, and there are all kinds of people in the university, and this behavior is not strange.

I think this kind of behavior is very shameful, because as a college student, the most basic qualities and morals should still be had, and being able to go to college also proves that you have a certain amount of knowledge, and the behavior of stealing takeaway is definitely wrong, and even morally condemned, no matter what the reason.

This is a common behavior of many college students nowadays, because their consumption is particularly high, and they usually have no money to spend, and then they want to try snacks outside, so they can't do this.

Such people have no moral qualities at all, so I think they should be punished by law.

This kind of behavior has constituted the crime of theft, and it also harms the legitimate rights and interests of other students, so it should be punished by law.

There will always be a reasonable explanation for calculating transaction costs and total social costs.

If someone steals takeaway in a university, how many people have to lose? Students who buy takeout are bound to lose, and efficient word-of-mouth may also have losses. Then, because the student who bought the takeaway loses, there may be complaints, which will affect the takeaway brother or the merchant.

It seems that everyone has lost in this matter, except for the one who stole the takeaway, which can be said to be a loss, and the person who stole the takeaway is really hurtful to others and self-interested. However, it is difficult to solve the problem with such a simple sense of justice, because legitimacy does not provide a feasible solution with strong operability.

But if you want to stop it, the cost is different. When we want to solve a problem, we should not only look at the legal legitimacy and moral legitimacy, but also calculate the total cost of society and the transaction cost of all parties, so as to provide a more feasible solution to this society. The total social cost is the cost that everyone has to pay when solving the problem, and most of it may be consumed, and cannot be calculated as the net income of the society.

Although this process of internal friction may satisfy some people's sense of morality, it cannot really solve the substantive problems for society. It is most advisable to choose the one with the lowest total social cost among the schemes.

The cost of getting students to eat outside the school is too high.

Solution 1: Don't buy takeout, go out directly.

In this way, the cost of students' time will be much higher, and the cost of energy will also be consumed. On the premise of time and energy cost, I am afraid that the school will also spend additional costs, and even significant losses. Now that we are in the epidemic stage, if the indefinite number of migrants increases, it may also lead to the appropriate epidemic management of the school, so the risk and cost borne by the school will rise.

Spending money to set up a self-pickup cabinet seems to be costly, but in fact it is more beneficial.

Another solution: to set up a self-pickup cabinet.

This self-pickup cabinet allows the courier guys to put the takeaway that needs to be placed, corresponding to the necessary extraction code. The school seems to spend money, but it is actually an insurance measure to avoid excessive mobility, and it also really improves the student experience in school, and the money is worth it. Since it is apportionment, it is completely possible for students to contribute a part of the funds within a certain range.

What to do? This means that if students pick up takeout within 15 minutes to 20 minutes, they can use it for free, and if they leave it for too long, they will be charged an occupancy fee. In this way, the cost of public resources will be shared, and she will definitely come to get it in time for those students who are in a hurry to eat, and those who are not in a hurry, and they don't want to consider public facilities, so you can pay.

I think it's better to call the police and stop this behavior in time, so that the person who steals the thing can be punished.

You are confusing the relationship between the whole and the individual.

There is an early Peking University graduate in Xi'an, or is it a pig killer, isn't it still a mixed trend?

After all, there are only a few people who deliver couriers and takeaways after graduating from university, and most of them are local universities.

Those who graduated from primary school and can become bosses of large enterprises are a very small minority, and most of them are ordinary people.

A college diploma is just a stepping stone, and what kind of job you can do is a personal ability and opportunity.

If you only talk about the position by diploma, then you don't need to take various exams.

Most of the big bosses who graduated from primary school were produced in the early days of reform and opening up, when many industries were blank.

Now that you can become a big boss after graduating from elementary school, it is basically impossible.

Nowadays, there are indeed many college students who go to deliver takeaways, but they are all short-term, and there are many college students who deliver takeaways during the summer and winter vacations.

I've seen a lot of them myself, and some of them are doing well, seven or eight thousand a month.

Why do many highly educated people still live in poverty? Does reading too many books really work?

There are several reasons for stealing takeaways.

1. People who have not received quality education, have low quality, have not received higher quality education, and have not been influenced by a good family, stealing takeaway is a smart behavior for them. What a sense of honor and accomplishment it is to steal takeout and eat it for free.

2. Revenge on society, dissatisfaction with society, want to take revenge on society, stealing takeaway will have psychological comfort.

3. When the financial ability is not good and you can't work. If you want to survive on this, social competition is getting bigger and bigger, and there are too many disabled people who can't work, there are too many unemployed people, they can't eat, and when they are homeless, they will steal takeout. Doing so is also their way of survival.

The couple's motivation for stealing and eating takeout was that they had not eaten after a day of work and felt hungry, which led to the idea of stealing takeaway. After a hard day's work, I was still hungry, and I wanted to eat something to fill my stomach, and this urgency was understandable. However, the way to fill the stomach is to adopt the act of stealing other people's takeaways, which is not worthy of sympathy!

The takeaway brother comes in the wind and goes in the rain, and it is hard money to earn. But if the delivered takeaway is lost, the light person complains, and the heavy one is fined and deducted money for compensation, and the day may be in vain. Therefore, what the takeaway brother is most afraid of is such a thing as losing takeaway, but in reality, what he is afraid of will come, and there is a takeaway brother here who has encountered the loss of takeaway, but he didn't expect that the person who stole the takeaway was actually a "peer".

According to the clues, the police quickly locked up a husband and wife, and arrested the two people in the afternoon of the next day. After investigation, the couple is also a delivery person, and the two of them have not eaten until late at night because they have worked, and they have the idea of stealing food when they see the takeaway. So, when the little brother went upstairs to deliver food, they secretly took away the two takeaways to be delivered in the incubator.

At present, 2 people have been administratively punished in accordance with the law, and the case is being handled.