-
It depends on what your standards are and what is good.
If you think it's cheap, it's 125
If you think it's good to have more features, it's 240
If you think the pixel is high, it's good, they're the same.
If you consider the cost performance, it is still 125
If you're not bad for money, the more expensive the 240 310, the better.
If you don't have a lot of money, 240 210 135 105 is all good.
-
Both cameras look exactly the same.
The parameters are exactly the same.
240 to 125 is different.
240.The inch touch display 125 is the ordinary inch.
240 with wifi
125 is a lot cheaper than 240.
More than 240 features are practically impractical.
Therefore, the 125 is much more cost-effective.
-
The IXUS 240 HS is recommended, it is a large 24mm wide angle, which has a great advantage in shooting large scenes. The machine can also support automatic recognition of 58 different scenarios. In addition, it also supports high-quality high-speed continuous shooting in one second, so you can capture details in a flash.
The wifi function is an artifact, which can be transmitted and shared with mobile devices such as mobile phones and tablets, as well as other Canon cameras with this function, so that it is easy to share on the network for the first time. Now the net price is about 2k, you can go and take a look.
-
Of course, the Canon ixus245 is better, the ixus245 has a wide-angle end of 24mm, a maximum aperture value, an image processor of 5 generations, and a continuous shooting speed of shots per second. The IXUS140 has a wide-angle end of 28mm, a maximum aperture value for opening the mode, and a 4th generation image processor, so the continuous shooting speed is slow every second. The ixus140 is only equipped with a slightly larger optical zoom factor, and there are no other advantages at all.
-
Hello! The Canon Ixus 245 HS should certainly be chosen.
Compared to the Canon Ixus 140 HS, the Canon IXUS 245 HS has the following advantages:
1. The Canon IXUS 245 HS is equipped with the latest DIGIC 5 image processor, which has faster data processing capabilities, stronger noise suppression capabilities, and a more "clean" image quality (17 times faster than the DIGIC 4 image processor configured with the Canon IXUS 140, and the noise is reduced to only 70% of the DIGIC 4).
2. The maximum aperture of the Canon IXUS 245 HS is better than the maximum aperture of the Canon IXUS 140 HS.
3. The Canon Ixus 245 HS achieves a continuous shooting speed of fps (high-speed burst mode), which is better than the Canon ixus 140 HS fps (low-light mode).
4. The Canon IXUS 245 HS LCD screen is upgraded to an inch touch screen, which is better than the Canon IXUS 140 HS 3-inch non-touch screen.
5. Canon IXUS 245 HS supports WiFi sharing function, which adds the latest wireless printing leakage function in front of the limb, adding a new way for transmission and output. The Canon Ixus 140 HS does not have this feature.
Finally, the Canon Ixus 245 HS, which leads in overall performance, is cheaper than the Canon Ixus 140.
Canon Ixus 245 HS (1230 yuan).
Canon IXUS 140 (1259 yuan).
-
There are no experts but there are players, if you really want to work well, please start with Panasonic LX5, and you have the corresponding level to experience his goodness.
The parameters of consumer-grade DC are floating clouds, mixing the ** of the three machines, more than 99% of people can't tell who is good and who is bad, who shoots,**Good or bad only lies in your own technology and later stage, the rest is nonsense, the landlord understands it after using it more.
Under such a premise, of course, the SX240 with the best features is the most worth buying, but Canon's video recording and sex price have always been very bloody, and it is recommended that Sony HX30 or Panasonic ZS20.
In addition, give the landlord a bottom first, don't expect too much from the night view of the small DC, the tripod will always be the royal road.
-
There are three main factors that affect the image quality of a camera: image sensor CMOS, image processor, and lens.
Here's a comparison:
1. Image sensor:
1) Sensor size:
The three cameras listed by the landlord are all 1-inch.
2) Number of pixels:
The SX240 HS is 12.1 million, and the IXUS 240 HS and IXUS 245 HS are both 16.1 million.
Conclusion: IXUS 240 HS and IXUS 245 HS are better than SX240 HS.
2. Image processor:
All three cameras are exactly the same, all DigiC 5.
3. Lens: 1) Effective focal length:
The SX240 HS is 25-500mm, and the IXUS 240 HS and IXUS 245 HS are both 24-120mm;
2) Maximum Aperture:
The SX240 HS is F, and the IXUS 240 HS and IXUS 245 HS are F.
Conclusion: The IXUS 240 HS and IXUS 245 HS are better than the SX240 HS when only image quality is considered.
Therefore, landlords should give preference to IXUS 240 HS and IXUS 245 HS.
As for which of the two to choose, it depends on the shape and function of which one between the two is more preferred by the landlord.
Personally, I think: the choice is cheaper.
If the landlord agrees, it's the IXUS 240 HS.
-
Which one to buy? What about the price? Did you buy it online, or in a physical store? How do you use it?
-
Canon iX 125 HS LCD screen, 24mm wide angle, 5x optical zoom, 16.1 million pixels, 1-inch CMOS sensor, DigiC5 image processing system, 3cm macro, slowest shutter speed 15s
Canon iX 230 HS LCD screen, 28mm wide angle, 8x optical zoom, 12.1 million pixels, 1-inch CMOS sensor, DigiC4 image processing system, 1cm macro, slowest shutter speed 15s
Canon iX 240 HS touch LCD, 24mm wide angle, 5x optical zoom, 16.1 million pixels, 1-inch CMOS sensor, DigiIC5 image processing system, 3cm macro, slowest shutter speed 15s, Wi-Fi band
Compared with the parameters of the three cameras, the IXUS 240 HS is like an upgraded version of the IXUS 125 HS, and the performance mainly replaces the LCD screen with a touch LCD screen, and also brings Wi-Fi function.
The IXUS 125 HS IXUS 240 HS is a bit better at the IXUS 230 HS, with the IXUS 125 240 HS having a better wide-angle ratio and the IXUS 230 HS having a better macro and optical zoom. The IXUS 125 240 HS uses Canon's latest DigiC5 image processing system, and the IXUS 230 HS uses the previous generation DIGIC4 image processing system.
In terms of stabilization performance, all three cameras are Canon HS stabilization systems, and the performance is similar. And it is recommended to use a tripod for night shooting, and stabilization is useless.
If you want to shoot at night, you can consider the Canon Power Shot SX240 HS around 2000, which is a portable telephoto camera with manual operation, which is better than the above three in terms of operation. However, they are all 1-inch CMOS sensors, so there will be no difference in image quality.
-
ixus240 is more dominant First of all, 240 is an upgraded version of 230 There are improvements in processor and pixels In addition, 240 uses digic5 processor It does a good job in noise reduction So high-sensitivity imaging is better and more suitable for shooting night scenes 125 is an upgraded version of 115 It is a grade lower than 240 Because of this, 240 will be better than 115 in stabilization and other aspects
-
It's all card cameras. Not much difference. It's best to go to a canon store and experience it.
If you want to learn photography with a card machine, then buy the Nikon S710 with full manual function, wide angle, 1400W pixels. >>>More
If you want to learn photography, the A2000 is the best of the best. >>>More
Personal advice and opinions for your reference:
The Canon Ixus is a card player with a telescopic lens, which has slightly better imaging results than a card player with a periscope lens. >>>More
T700 is cool enough and stylish enough.
But. Comparison of the T-series and the IXUS series. >>>More
Professional reviews of the T700 are not out yet and there are no references. >>>More