What will humans live by eating in the future? What will humans live by eating in the future?

What human beings eat in the future ultimately depends on their own creation;

If human beings are creating the world now, then the future will be enjoyment;

If humanity is destroying the world now, then it will be sinful in the future;

The question of human beings is worth pondering.

The human body is mechanized and eats electricity. The human body is vegetative, relying on light energy. The latter live a long time.

Eating a cloned self and genetically modifying human beings to devour and digest others, so that all parts of the body can be updated in time and will not age.

With the progress of human beings, human beings will pay more and more attention to scientific diet, life on earth will continue forever, and birth, old age, sickness and death will also be the only law for the continuation of human beings.

Why do you come twice for the title, I am dazzled, what to eat is eternal Of course, there is only an elixir, such a simple question The third floor is really talented Ha.

It's still the same as before, southerners eat rice, northerners eat wheat.

I think you'll have to ask God, kid.

Personal opinion, except death, nothing is eternal, including the sun.

Personal opinion, except death, nothing is eternal, including the sun.

Anyway, you can't live by eating dung.

Don't worry, people are intelligent and will certainly not starve to death.

No, people may want to be satisfied in their hearts.

If you are hungry every day, you will have a feeling of dissatisfaction, so you are like you are bored and lonely, you will have a feeling of dissatisfaction, so you have to find friends, finish games, surf the Internet, etc., you can't get the approval of others, you will feel dissatisfied, so you have to struggle and work hard to make others look up to you.

If you can't buy what you want, you feel unsatisfied, so you have to work hard to earn money and let yourself buy what you want to buy.

Therefore, to live is to let yourself have a sense of satisfaction and gain inner comfort.

Eating is just one of them, so there are so many people who chase fame and fortune, and the person who does not chase fame and fortune is because he is content, and he thinks that plain and insipid is enough, so he does not pursue it. If you want to find the meaning of your life, you need to know how you can be satisfied.

I wish you happiness.

No! Eat to live, but living isn't just about eating. The natural world requires you to reproduce, and human society requires you to have a belief and a value of life that you yearn for. The former is a requirement for animals, and the latter is a requirement for humans.

Of course, this is not true, if people live to eat, all living things live to eat. Besides, when people live in the world, eating is only a natural attribute to maintain survival, and the social attribute of human beings determines that when the natural attributes are guaranteed, there will be other things that continue to maintain the conditions for survival (this can be demonstrated by the suicide of some depressed people).

Not exactly, eating is definitely to be eaten, but it depends on what you eat, what you eat, and how you eat, which involves life. In a word, people live not only to eat, but also to prove that they eat better than others.

No, people have to eat while they are alive, but eating is only the basics. People should also have a high spiritual aspect of life, and it seems too pitiful just to eat.

No, eating is just to live, but people don't live just to eat, some people live for others, some people live for themselves, live to achieve their goals.

To live is to survive, and the basic conditions for survival are to breathe, drink, and eat. This is on a material level. The other thing is the spiritual thing. Yes, man lives for the sake of eating, but not just for eating.

Wrong! Eating is to maintain a state of being alive, and living is to do something worthy of the world for the sake of the world, which is simply "people come for one thing and go for one thing."".

Yes! You have to eat 3 meals a day, so eat better, so that when you eat, you don't just eat for the sake of eating, but eat for the sake of enjoying the food, that is a kind of enjoyment in life!

So it's good to eat As a foodie, you can know that the best things are delicious, and you can also tell others that you feel like you've helped others!

Man does not live to eat, but food is essential for human survival, if there is a God, then where did man come from? You're asking too big a question.

You can say yes or you can say it's wrong, and the reason is very simple: everything you do is to eat, but it's not all about eating, and if you don't eat, you starve to death, anyway, people live to eat.

No, people can live for themselves, or for others, but the meaning of doing will be different, if there is no goal and do nothing, life will not be fun, but if it is for the goal, ideal and struggle, then this person's daily life is full of fun, and life is full of brilliance.

I suggest that if you have an ideal, you should take action now.

Reverse thinking, if you don't eat, people will definitely not be able to live, this sentence is true, but the reverse is the problem, eating is to ensure that you can live, and people live not only to eat, but also to think, enjoy... This is also the biggest difference between humans and animals.

This is actually not a problem, people live to eat, but depending on how you eat, whether you are begging to eat all your life, or making unremitting efforts to pursue more high-end food, this seemingly simple question actually contains a very profound philosophy of life.

Definitely not, people live not only for themselves, but also for others, such as family, friends, etc., especially their parents. If you live well, you can do more things for the people around you, and if you don't live well, you must complete the business you should do, such as taking care of your parents and supporting your wife and children. Let's do our best......

Of course not, there are still many things to do, such as work, study, family, etc., but the premise of doing these things is that you must eat enough, and if you only have food left, what is the meaning of that person's life?

To live, you must first survive, so you have to rely on your parents to support you, study first, and then work;

The next thing is to live, you have to get married and have children, and complete the normal law of biological reproduction, so that you have to work hard to make your wife and children worry-free; Finally, you should be grateful, you should be filial to your parents, be kind to your friends, and be kind to your neighbors, so that you should behave properly, be strict with yourself, and be lenient with others.

To sum up, people live is a responsibility, is an obligation, parents will give birth to you, raise you, you will change from a natural person to a social person, you should shoulder the responsibility of the family, society, go with the flow of life, in a word: life is willing to pay, at the same time you also gain more.

Eating is a necessity to keep people alive. I think the quality of life must be related to eating, but it's not just about eating, you say? What's more important is to realize one's own personal value and social value, right?

No! When your loved one is hurt, all you think about is how to deal with it. When you found something that might be successful, you were full of thoughts about how to do it and how to act. When you fail, fail and fail, and lose all your age and social opportunities, you may think: Do people live to eat?

Of course it is, there is a saying that it is like this, the food and color are also, eating and color are innate, you think about it, these two things do not have to be handed over to you.

In order to eat better, to eat better in order to live better, and then to eat better, to eat better in order to live better. Infinite loops...

It's definitely not right, just let you eat anything, that person must be an absolutely useless person.

In the past feudal era, people should live to "establish morality, meritorious service, and speech", and now the pursuit is not necessarily like this, there are various pursuits, such as the party's requirement to "serve the people", but people live only to eat, the realm is too low, on the contrary, according to Maslow's analysis, people have no food, people's pursuit will be very limited.

In a word, living for oneself is the bare minimum purpose.