-
Anonymous users2024-02-08If it is an ordinary soldier, the safest is the shield army, which has a tool for self-protection, and the easiest to die is the infantry in front, and the charge is really tragic.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-07When fighting, it should be the safest firehead, after all, it is the one who cooks, and the most dangerous one may be the vanguard, rushing to the front and bearing the brunt.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06The safest class is the one that is supposed to cook and protect the Emperor, and the one that is most likely to die is definitely the one that rushes to the front of the battle.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05The safest is the gang leader, who is only responsible for cooking in the barracks, and does not need to go to the battlefield, unless there are no soldiers in the barracks.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-04Guards, they are responsible for protecting the leader, there is no combat mission, if the war is short of people, even the firehead is on it, because they are reserves.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-03I think the safest classes are the ones that fire arrows in the troops, they fire the arrows first, and then ah, the infantry behind them start to charge.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-02I think the safest are the soldiers who cook, don't have to go to the battlefield, don't have to face the enemy; The most dangerous, I think, is the soldiers in the 1st platoon.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-01In ancient times, in many formations, in fact, the soldiers in the first row were relatively safe, for example, in many formations, if the two sides were going to start archery, then the soldiers in the first row usually had to squat or semi-squat to shoot arrows, because they were squatting, so the force area was relatively small, so the probability of these soldiers being in danger would be much lower.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-31Because when the two armies are fighting, arrows are often used to destroy part of the enemy's forces from a distance, and almost all of the people standing in the first row have shields, so it is relatively safe.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-30Because in ancient times, there was that shield in battles, and the people in front of them had shields to block them, so it was relatively safe.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-29Because the soldiers standing in the first row will all hold large shields, it is relatively safe.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-28Bai Qi kills the gods, I know this one.
The aristocracy sat on the toilet, and the commoners generally squatted in the thatched pit, because there was no such thing as us in ancient times.
In ancient times, there were several main ways to brew liquor: >>>More
In the past, the heat island effect of the city was not so exaggerated, all of them were low houses, wooden houses, earthen houses, and brick houses, and the effect on ventilation was still very good. And it is mostly a brick and tile structure, which will be cooler than a small bungalow and a small western-style building (the principle is unknown, the contemptible person is next door to a person with a little money, but the same window and door direction is stuffy, and the contemptible hometown is an old tile house). Basically, there is a shady place, such as under the shade of a tree, so that it doesn't feel too hot. >>>More
Left. The reason is very simple: the main seat sits in the north and faces south, and its left hand is east and right is west, so in ancient times, although the official position of the left and right sides of the throne has changed many times, but the seat has always been left, for example: the left is waiting.
<> meaning: robbery language, subtext, take money.
A correct understanding of article 269 of the Criminal Code on the transformation of the crimes of theft, fraud and robbery into robbery. Article 269 of the Penal Code stipulates that "a person who commits the crime of theft, fraud or robbery, and who uses violence or threatens violence on the spot in order to conceal stolen goods, resist arrest or destroy criminal evidence" shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the crime of robbery. Theoretically, this provision is also referred to as the provision of the crime of quasi-robbery. >>>More